Classification Appeal Process Sample Clauses

Classification Appeal Process. (a) Where an employee believes that his job has been improperly classified, he shall discuss his classification with his immediate supervisor. On request, the Employer will provide the employee with a written statement of the employee’s current job duties.
Sample 1Sample 2Sample 3See All (25)
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Classification Appeal Process. Where an employee believes that her job has been improperly classified, she shall discuss her classification with her immediate Supervisor. On request, the Employer will provide the employee with a written statement of the employee's current job duties. If the employee continues to believe that her classification is improper, she may indicate an appeal by filing a grievance directly at Step 3 of the grievance procedure as contained in Article 9. The written grievance must indicate which classification contained in the pay schedule of the current Collective Agreement the employee believes is the proper classification for the job. If, following the response at Step 3, there remains a dispute over the employee's classification, the Union may advance the matter to arbitration under Article 10. The Parties may agree to select an Arbitrator other than those set out on the agreed to list for the purpose of obtaining classification expertise.
Sample 1Sample 2Sample 3See All (11)
Classification Appeal Process. The following Classification Appeals Process is hereby agreed to by and between the Massachusetts Board of Higher Education; the Massachusetts Community Colleges; and the Massachusetts Community College Council. The objective of this proposal is to achieve timely classification and compensation decisions through placement of responsibility for the classification process at the local college and to provide for timely resolution of any appeal of those decisions.
Sample 1Sample 2Sample 3See All (10)
Classification Appeal Process. 1. If an employee is dissatisfied with the decision of the Classification & Organizational Design Division, an appeal of the decision may be submitted to the Classification Appeal Adjudicator of the Public Service Commission. The request for an appeal must identify which factor(s) is/are being challenged and the associated rationale for each factor(s). The appeal process is restricted to those factors identified as being challenged and sufficient reasoning provided.
Sample 1Sample 2Sample 3See All (7)
Classification Appeal Process. 13.06 If the Employer changes the classification allocation of the work being performed by a Regular Employee, and the Employee disagrees with the new classification allocation, or if the Employee disagrees with the outcome of the classification review, the Employee may appeal the Employer’s decision,
Sample 1Sample 2Sample 3See All (6)
Classification Appeal Process. The purpose of the Classification Appeal and Reconsideration Process is to provide the Employer and the Union with an effective process to deal with a Classification Appeal. If the Employer changes the classification allocation of the work being performed by a Regular Employee and the Employee disagrees with the classification allocation, or if the Employee disagrees with the outcome of the classification review, the Employee may appeal the Employer’s decision.
Sample 1Sample 2
Classification Appeal Process. (a) Where an employee believes that their job has been improperly classified, they shall discuss their classification with their immediate supervisor. On request, the Employer will provide the employee with a written statement of the employee's current job duties. If the employee continues to believe that their classification is improper, they may initiate an appeal by filing a grievance, via the Union, directly at Step 3 of the grievance procedure as contained in Article 9 – (Grievances). The written grievance must indicate which classification contained in the pay schedule of the current collective agreement the employee believes is the proper classification for the job. If, following the response at Step 3, there remains a dispute over the employee's classification, the Union may advance the matter to arbitration under Article 10 – (Arbitration). The parties may agree to select an arbitrator other than those set out on the agreed list for the purpose of obtaining classification expertise.
Sample 1
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Classification Appeal Process. New Positions‌
Sample 1
Classification Appeal Process 
Sample 1Sample 2Sample 3See All (4)

Related to Classification Appeal Process

  • Classification Appeal Procedure An employee shall have the right to appeal, through the Union, the classification of the position the employee occupies, or where a point rating plan has been used, the right to appeal the position's level. Classification matters are not grievable under Article 8 of this Agreement. Instead, the following procedures shall be followed.

  • Appeal Process PROVIDER may appeal any adverse finding by the Contract Compliance Officer as set forth in sec. 25.08(20)(c), D.C. Ords.

  • Appeal Procedure The Appeal will be deemed an appeal of the entire Arbitration Award. In conducting the Appeal, the Appeal Panel shall conduct a de novo review of all Claims described or otherwise set forth in the Arbitration Notice. Subject to the foregoing and all other provisions of this Paragraph 5, the Appeal Panel shall conduct the Appeal in a manner the Appeal Panel considers appropriate for a fair and expeditious disposition of the Appeal, may hold one or more hearings and permit oral argument, and may review all previous evidence and discovery, together with all briefs, pleadings and other documents filed with the Original Arbitrator (as well as any documents filed with the Appeal Panel pursuant to Paragraph 5.4(a) below). Notwithstanding the foregoing, in connection with the Appeal, the Appeal Panel shall not permit the parties to conduct any additional discovery or raise any new Claims to be arbitrated, shall not permit new witnesses or affidavits, and shall not base any of its findings or determinations on the Original Arbitrator’s findings or the Arbitration Award.

  • Classification Review (a) An Employee who has reason to believe that they are improperly classified due to a substantial change in job duties, may apply to the Department Director, or designate, to have the Employee’s classification reviewed. The Director, or designate, will review the Employee’s application and advise the Employee of the Employer’s decision.

  • Appeal Procedures A. Employees may appeal discipline imposed under this LOA through the Dispute Resolution Procedure contained in the Collective Bargaining Agreement (i.e. grievance procedure) or to the Minneapolis Civil Service Commission.

  • Grievance Commissioner System This is to confirm the discussion of the parties during collective bargaining that they are committed to encouraging early discussion and resolution of labour relations issues at the local level and seek to resolve grievances in a timely and cost efficient manner. To that end, this is to confirm that pursuant to Article 8, the parties agree that the Employer and Union at individual nursing homes may agree to utilize the following process in order to resolve a particular grievance through the utilization of a joint mediation-arbitration procedure:

  • GRIEVANCE ARBITRATION PROCEDURE The grievance-arbitration procedure set forth in Sections 16.32 through 16.38 shall be applicable only to disputes arising under Division C of this article.

  • Procedure for Benefits Modifications 1. Proposals for major retirement benefit modifications will be negotiated in joint meetings with the certified employee organizations whose memberships will be directly affected. Agreements reached between Management and organizations whereby a majority of the members in LACERS are affected shall be recommended to the City Council by the CAO as affecting the membership of all employees in LACERS. Such modifications need not be included in the MOU in order to be considered appropriately negotiated.

  • Review and Selection Process The Project Narratives of SAMHSA applications are peer-reviewed according to the evaluation criteria listed above. Decisions to fund a grant are based on the strengths and weaknesses of the application as identified by peer reviewers. The results of the peer review are advisory in nature. The program office and approving official make the final determination for funding based on the following: • Individual awards over $250,000 are approved by the Center for Mental Health Services National Advisory Council; • Availability of funds; • Equitable distribution of awards in terms of geography (including urban, rural, and remote settings) and balance among populations of focus and program size; • Submission of any required documentation that must be submitted prior to making an award; and • SAMHSA is required to review and consider any information about your organization that is in the Federal Award Performance and Integrity Information System (FAPIIS). In accordance with 45 CFR 75.212, SAMHSA reserves the right not to make an award to an entity if that entity does not meet the minimum qualification standards as described in section 75.205(a)(2). If SAMHSA chooses not to award a fundable application in accordance with 45 CFR 75.205(a)(2), SAMHSA must report that determination to the designated integrity and performance system accessible through the System for Award Management (XXX) [currently, FAPIIS]. You may review and comment on any information about your organization that a federal awarding agency previously entered. XXXXXX will consider your comments, in addition to other information in FAPIIS in making a judgment about your organization’s integrity, business ethics, and record of performance under federal awards when completing the review of risk posed as described in 45 CFR 75.205 HHS Awarding Agency Review of Risk by Applicants.

  • How to File an Appeal of a Prescription Drug Denial For denials of a prescription drug claim based on our determination that the service was not medically necessary or appropriate, or that the service was experimental or investigational, you may request an appeal without first submitting a request for reconsideration. You or your physician may file a written or verbal prescription drug appeal with our pharmacy benefits manager (PBM). The prescription drug appeal must be submitted to us within one hundred and eighty (180) calendar days of the initial determination letter. You will receive written notification of our determination within thirty (30) calendar days from the receipt of your appeal. How to File an Expedited Appeal Your appeal may require immediate action if a delay in treatment could seriously jeopardize your health or your ability to regain maximum function, or would cause you severe pain. To request an expedited appeal of a denial related to services that have not yet been rendered (a preauthorization review) or for on-going services (a concurrent review), you or your healthcare provider should call: • our Grievance and Appeals Unit; or • our pharmacy benefits manager for a prescription drug appeal. Please see Section 9 for contact information. You will be notified of our decision no later than seventy-two (72) hours after our receipt of the request. You may not request an expedited review of covered healthcare services already received.

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.