CONCLUSIONS OF LAW. 4 1. The conduct described in the Findings of Fact constitute grounds for disciplinary 5 action pursuant to A.R.S. §§ 32-3552(A)(1) and (3) and violate the provisions of A.R.S. § 32- 6 3501(9)(i) which states, “Any conduct or practice which is contrary to recognized standards of 7 ethics of the respiratory therapy profession or any conduct or practice which does or might 8 constitute a danger to the health, welfare or safety of the patient or the public.”
CONCLUSIONS OF LAW. 2 1. The Board has jurisdiction over Respondent pursuant to A.R.S. § 32-3251 et seq. 3 and the rules promulgated by the Board relating to Respondent’s professional practice as a 4 licensed behavioral health professional.
CONCLUSIONS OF LAW. 17 1. The Board has jurisdiction over Respondent pursuant to A.R.S. § 32-3251 et seq. 18 and the rules promulgated by the Board relating to Respondent’s professional practice as a 19 licensed behavioral health professional.
CONCLUSIONS OF LAW. 14. The Commissioner has jurisdiction over Respondent as well as the subject matter of this proceeding, and such proceeding is held in the public interest.
CONCLUSIONS OF LAW. 3.1 The Board has jurisdiction over the Respondent and the subject matter of this proceeding.
CONCLUSIONS OF LAW. 12. The application form’s disclosure questions specifically require disclosure of insurance administrative matters.
CONCLUSIONS OF LAW. Pursuant to A.R.S. §§ 32-1606, 32-1663 and 32-1664, the Board has subject matter and personal jurisdiction in this matter. The conduct and circumstances described in the Findings of Fact constitute violations of
CONCLUSIONS OF LAW. 21 1. The Board possesses subject matter and personal jurisdiction over 22 Respondent pursuant to A.R.S. § 32-1201 et seq.
CONCLUSIONS OF LAW. 2 1. The Board has jurisdiction in this matter pursuant to A.R.S. § 32-900, et seq.
CONCLUSIONS OF LAW. 9. The application form’s disclosure questions specifically require disclosure of insurance administrative matters. Xx. Xxxxxx provided incorrect, misleading, incomplete or materially untrue information in her Maine application for nonresident producer licensing by failing to disclose the Washington action when she applied, certified through the “Certification and Attestation” on the application that the information was true and complete, and has not provided an adequate legal explanation for this failure to provide accurate information.
