Interference Proceedings and Similar Claims Sample Clauses

Interference Proceedings and Similar Claims. No interference, opposition, reissue, reexamination, or other Legal Proceeding is pending or, to the Company’s Knowledge, threatened, in which the scope, validity, or enforceability of any Company IP is being, has been, or could reasonably be expected to be contested or challenged. To the Company’s Knowledge, there is no basis for a claim that any Company IP is invalid or unenforceable.
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Interference Proceedings and Similar Claims. No interference, opposition, reissue, reexamination, or other Proceeding is or has been pending or, to the knowledge of the Seller, threatened, in which the scope, validity, or enforceability of any Seller IP is being, has been, or could reasonably be expected to be contested or challenged. The Seller has no knowledge of any basis for a claim that any Seller IP is invalid or unenforceable.
Interference Proceedings and Similar Claims. No interference, opposition, reissue, reexamination, or other Proceeding is or since January 1, 2004 has been pending or, to Knowledge of the Acquired Corporations, threatened, in which the scope, validity, or enforceability of any Company IP is being, has been, or could reasonably be expected to be contested or challenged. To Knowledge of the Acquired Corporations, there is no basis for a claim that any Company IP is invalid or unenforceable.
Interference Proceedings and Similar Claims. No interference, opposition, reissue, reexamination, or other proceeding is or has been pending or, to the knowledge of Seller, threatened, in which the scope, validity, or enforceability of any Registered Intellectual Property is being, has been, or could reasonably be expected to be contested or challenged. Seller has no knowledge of any basis for a claim that any Registered Intellectual Property is invalid or unenforceable.
Interference Proceedings and Similar Claims. No interference, opposition, reissue, reexamination or other Legal Action is or has been pending or, to the Knowledge of Target, threatened, in which the scope, validity or enforceability of any Target IP is being, has been, or could reasonably be expected to be contested or challenged, except with respect to the Target’s or its Subsidiaries’ pending patent applications. To the Knowledge of Target, there is no basis for a claim that any Target IP is invalid or unenforceable.
Interference Proceedings and Similar Claims. No interference, opposition, reissue, reexamination, or other Proceeding of any nature is or has been pending or, to Target’s Knowledge, threatened, in which the scope, validity, or enforceability of any Target IP is being, has been, or could reasonably be expected to be contested or challenged.
Interference Proceedings and Similar Claims. Except as set forth in Schedule 3.14(h)(iv), no third party has challenged the scope, validity or enforceability of any Business IP in any Proceeding currently pending before the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (or any foreign equivalent) or any other court or tribunal. To the Knowledge of Seller, there is no reasonable basis for a claim that any Business IP is invalid or unenforceable.
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Interference Proceedings and Similar Claims. Except as set forth in Part 2.9(h)(iv) of the Disclosure Schedule, no interference, opposition, reissue, reexamination, or other Proceeding is or has been pending or, to the best of the knowledge of the Company, threatened, in which the scope, validity, or enforceability of any Company IP is being, has been, or could reasonably be expected to be contested or challenged. To the best of the knowledge of the Company, there is no basis for a claim that any Company IP is invalid or unenforceable.
Interference Proceedings and Similar Claims. No interference, opposition, reissue, reexamination, or other Proceeding is or has been pending or, to the Sellers Knowledge, threatened, in which the scope, validity, or enforceability of any Seller IP is being, has been or could reasonably be expected to be contested or challenged. To the Sellers Knowledge, there is no basis for a claim that any Seller IP is invalid or unenforceable, other than those raised in office actions or similar documents issued by the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (or foreign equivalent) in the normal course of prosecution of the applicable Registered IP.
Interference Proceedings and Similar Claims. Except as set forth in Section 4.6(g)(iv) of the Disclosure Schedule, no third party has challenged the scope, validity or enforceability of any Transferred IP in any Proceeding. To the Knowledge of Seller, there is no reasonable basis for a claim that any Transferred IP is invalid or unenforceable.
Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.