Part II. The faculty and the department head’s immediate supervisor in the appropriate unit will each prepare a separate evaluation statement (entitled “Part II”) that will include assessments of the individual’s effectiveness in leadership, management, teaching, service and scholarship. Each separate evaluation statement will include a summary rating of the department head’s leadership and management as Exceptionally Effective; Highly Effective; Effective; Less than Effective; Unsatisfactory. Both evaluation statements will be submitted to the department head not later than March 15.
Part II. Price Bid In view of Two Part Tender, the Offers submitted contrary to above instructions will be summarily rejected.
Part II. Required State Provisions; and the remaining requirements shall be interpreted in a manner so as to allow for the terms contained therein to remain valid and consistent with such superseding provisions. If any provision of these Supplementary Conditions relates to a matter embraced by another provision(s) of these Supplementary Conditions, but is not in conflict therewith, all such provisions shall apply. Any question as to which requirements control in a particular instance which cannot be resolved by Contractor and Subrecipient shall be submitted in writing (indicating the issue and the applicable provisions) by Subrecipient to GOSR, which shall decide the applicable question.
Part II. Colored American, 1840-41; The North Star, July 1849-1851; Xxxxxxxxx Xxxxxxxx’ Paper (continuation of The North Star), 1851-May 1852; National Era, 1847-Dec. 1850; Provincial Xxxxxxx, Toronto, ON, 1854-Dec. 18, 1855. Part III: Xxxxxxxxx Xxxxxxxx’ Paper, May 1852-Dec. 1852; National Era, Dec. 1850-Dec. 1853; Provincial Xxxxxxx, Dec. 1855-57; The Christian Recorder, Toronto, ON, 1861-April 1862. Part IV: The Christian Recorder, May 1862-Dec. 1864; National Era, Jan. 1854-Dec. 1855; Xxxxxxxxx Xxxxxxxx’ Paper, Jan. 1853-Dec. 1854.
Part II. Approval of a component with regard to its burning behaviour and/or its capability to repel fuel or lubricant
Part II. Price Bid Part-II of the Bid shall be submitted in Envelope –II and shall contain Price Bid only. The Prices are to be submitted strictly in the Price Schedule/ Schedule of Rate (SOR) format of the Tender Document. GAIL shall not be responsible for any failure on the part of the bidder to follow the instructions given in the Note below. Note:
Part II. RECORDING AND FILING DATA Recording and filing of Original Indenture.................. 14
Part II. At all material point of time Sri Xxxxxx Xxxxxxx Xxxxxx was the recorded owner of ALL THAT piece and parcel of land admeasuring about 13.5 Decimal at R.S. Dag No. 72 corresponding to L.R. Dag No. 72, along with some other property in various other Dags under Khatian No. 914 situated and lying at Mouza Uttar Kajirhat, X.X No. 22, Touzi No. 3, 4, 5, P.S. Bhishnupur, in the District South 24 Parganas.( herein referred to as the said property II in Dag no. 72). By and through a registered Deed of Conveyance dated 28th July, 2011 registered in the office of Additional Registrar of Bishnupur, in Book No. I, CD Volume No. 17, Pages from 276 to 290 being No. 04332 for the year 2011 made between Sri Xxxxxx Xxxxxxx Xxxxxx, herein referred to as the vendors of the one part sold, transferred and conveyed all that piece and parcel of said property II to Tirupati Enclave Pvt. Ltd. represented by its Director Xxxx Xxxxxxxx therein referred to as the Purchaser of the other part. PART-III By and through a registered Deed of Conveyance dated 6thSeptember, 2013 registered in the office of Additional District Sub Registrar of Bishnupur, in Book No. I, CD Volume No. 11, Pages from 5255 to 5286 being No. 04806 for the year 2013 made between Shiv Niketan Pvt. Ltd., sold , transferred and conveyed all that piece and parcel of Sali land admeasuring 6.75 decimals be little more or less comprised in R.S. Dag no. and L.R. Dag No. 72, X.X. No. 22, Touzi No. 3,4,5, L.R. Khatian No. 560,144,99 situated and lying at Mouza Uttar kajirahat, P.S. Bhishnupur,
Part II. Example 2. If the number of the PSU Shares, as stated on the Recipient’s Acceptance Page, is 24,360 shares of Common Stock, then the number of the Targeted Shares is 20,000 shares. Furthermore under this example, because as of the Award Date, the Fair Value Multiplier has been determined by the Committee to be 101.5%, then the number of the Initially Adjusted Targeted Shares is 20,300 shares. Then, as a result, 50% of the number of the Initially Adjusted Targeted Shares is 10,150 shares. Still further under this example, because as of the Award Date, the Revenue CAGR Threshold has been determined by the Committee to be 5% and the Revenue CAGR Target has been determined by the Committee to be 10%, if following the end of the Measurement Period, the Company’s Revenue CAGR is determined by the Committee to be 8.75%, then the Revenue CAGR Multiplier is 75%. Still further under this example, because as of the Award Date, the ROIC Target has been determined by the Committee to be 10% and the ROIC Max has been determined by the Committee to be 12%, if following the end of the Measurement Period, the Company’s ROIC is determined by the Committee to be 10.5%, then the ROIC Multiplier is 105%. Then, as a result, the number of the Further Adjusted Shares I is 7,612.5 shares and the number of the Further Adjusted Shares II is 10,657.5 shares, respectively. Therefore, the number of the Vested Shares is 18,270 shares. (D). Part III. Example 3. If the number of the PSU Shares, as stated on the Recipient’s Acceptance Page, is 24,360 shares of Common Stock, then the number of the Targeted Shares is 20,000 shares. Furthermore under this example, because as of the Award Date, the Fair Value Multiplier has been determined by the Committee to be 101.5%, then the number of the Initially Adjusted Targeted Shares is 20,300 shares. Then, as a result, 50% of the number of the Initially Adjusted Targeted Shares is 10,150 shares. Still further under this example, because as of the Award Date, the Revenue CAGR Target has been determined by the Committee to be 10% and the Revenue CAGR Max has been determined by the Committee to be 15%, if following the end of the Measurement Period, the Company’s Revenue CAGR is determined by the Committee to be 13%, then the Revenue CAGR Multiplier is 112%. Still further under this example, because as of the Award Date, the ROIC Target has been determined by the Committee to be 10% and the ROIC Max has been determined by the Committee to be 12%, if fo...
Part II. The faculty in the appropriate unit will prepare an evaluation statement (entitled “Part II”) that will include assessments of the individual’s effectiveness in leadership, management, teaching and scholarship. The faculty may ask to meet with the immediate supervisor to discuss the evaluation. If requested, such meeting shall be upon two weeks’ notice and not later than March 31st. The faculty may submit their evaluation with or without benefit of such a meeting. This evaluation will include a summary rating of the department head’s leadership and management as Exceptionally Effective; Highly Effective; Effective; Less than Effective; Unsatisfactory. The evaluation will be submitted to both the department head and immediate supervisor not later than April 30.
