Public Benefit. It is Simplicity’s understanding that the commitments it has agreed to herein, and actions to be taken by Simplicity under this Settlement Agreement, would confer a significant benefit to the general public, as set forth in Code of Civil Procedure § 1021.5 and Cal. Admin. Code tit. 11, § 3201. As such, it is the intent of Simplicity that to the extent any other private party initiates an action alleging a violation of Proposition 65 with respect to Simplicity’s failure to provide a warning concerning exposure to DEHP prior to use of the Products it has manufactured, distributed, sold, or offered for sale in California, or will manufacture, distribute, sell, or offer for sale in California, such private party action would not confer a significant benefit on the general public as to those Products addressed in this Settlement Agreement, provided that Simplicity is in material compliance with this Settlement Agreement.
Public Benefit. It is Ningbo’s understanding that the commitments it has agreed to herein, and actions to be taken by Ningbo under this Settlement Agreement, would confer a significant benefit to the general public, as set forth in Code of Civil Procedure § 1021.5 and Cal. Admin. Code tit. 11, § 3201. As such, it is the intent of Ningbo that to the extent any other private party initiates an action alleging a violation of Proposition 65 with respect to Ningbo failure to provide a warning concerning exposure to DEHP prior to use of the Products it has manufactured, distributed, sold, or offered for sale in California, or will manufacture, distribute, sell, or offer for sale in California, such private party action would not confer a significant benefit on the general public as to those Products addressed in this Settlement Agreement, provided that Ningbo is in material compliance with this Settlement Agreement.
Public Benefit. It is Plano’ understanding that the commitments it has agreed to herein, and actions to be taken by Plano under this Settlement Agreement, would confer a significant benefit to the general public, as set forth in Code of Civil Procedure § 1021.5 and Cal. Admin. Code tit. 11, § 3201. As such, it is the intent of Plano that to the extent any other private party initiates an action alleging a violation of Proposition 65 with respect to Plano failure to provide a warning concerning exposure to BPA prior to use of the Products it has manufactured, distributed, sold, or offered for sale in California, or will manufacture, distribute, sell, or offer for sale in California, such private party action would not confer a significant benefit on the general public as to those Products addressed in this Settlement Agreement, provided that Plano is in material compliance with this Settlement Agreement.
Public Benefit. It is Onyx’s understanding that the commitments it has agreed to herein, and actions to be taken by Onyx under this Settlement Agreement, would confer a significant benefit to the general public, as set forth in Code of Civil Procedure § 1021.5 and Cal. Admin. Code tit. 11, § 3201. As such, it is the intent of Onyx that to the extent any other private party initiates an action alleging a violation of Proposition 65 with respect to Onyx failure to provide a warning concerning exposure to DEHP prior to use of the Products it has manufactured, distributed, sold, or offered for sale in California, or will manufacture, distribute, sell, or offer for sale in California, such private party action would not confer a significant benefit on the general public as to those Products addressed in this Settlement Agreement, provided that Onyx is in material compliance with this Settlement Agreement.
Public Benefit. It is XR's understanding that the commitments it has agreed to herein, and actions to be taken by XR under this Settlement Agreement confer a significant benefit to the general public, as set forth in Code of Civil Procedure § 1021.5 and Cal. Admin. Code tit. 11, § 3201. As such, it is the intent of XR that to the extent any other private party serves a notice and/or initiates an action alleging a violation of Proposition 65 with respect to XR's alleged failure to provide a warning concerning actual or alleged exposure to DEHP prior to use of the Covered Products it has manufactured, distributed, sold, or offered for sale in California, or will manufacture, distribute, sell, or offer for sale in California, such private party action would not confer a significant benefit on the general public as to those Covered Products addressed in this Settlement Agreement, provided that XR is in material compliance with this Settlement Agreement.
Public Benefit. It is the Parties’ belief that the terms of this Settlement Agreement confer a significant benefit to the general public as set forth in California Code of Civil Procedure section 1021.5 and California Administrative Code title 11, section 3201. As such, it is the intent of the Parties that to the extent any other private party initiates an action alleging that the Covered Products are somehow in violation of Proposition 65, such private party action would not confer a significant benefit on the general public, so long as POP is in material compliance with the terms of this Settlement Agreement.
Public Benefit. It is Raghuvir’s understanding that the commitments it has agreed to herein, and actions to be taken by Xxxxxxxx under this Settlement Agreement, would confer a significant benefit to the general public, as set forth in Code of Civil Procedure § 1021.5 and Cal. Admin. Code tit. 11, § 3201. As such, it is the intent of Xxxxxxxx that to the extent any other private party initiates an action alleging a violation of Proposition 65 with respect to Xxxxxxxx failure to provide a warning concerning exposure to DEHP prior to use of the Products it has manufactured, distributed, sold, or offered for sale in California, or will manufacture, distribute, sell, or offer for sale in California, such private party action would not confer a significant benefit on the general public as to those Products addressed in this Settlement Agreement, provided that Xxxxxxxx is in material compliance with this Settlement Agreement.
Public Benefit. It is Deluxity’s understanding that the commitments it has agreed to herein, and actions to be taken by Deluxity under this Settlement Agreement, would confer a significant benefit to the general public, as set forth in Code of Civil Procedure § 1021.5 and Cal. Admin. Code tit. 11, § 3201. As such, it is the intent of Deluxity that to the extent any other private party initiates an action alleging a violation of Proposition 65 with respect to Deluxity failure to provide a warning concerning exposure to DEHP prior to use of the Products it has manufactured, distributed, sold, or offered for sale in California, or will manufacture, distribute, sell, or offer for sale in California, such private party action would not confer a significant benefit on the general public as to those Products addressed in this Settlement Agreement, provided that Deluxity is in material compliance with this Settlement Agreement.
Public Benefit. The Parties acknowledge that their contributions to the Project are meant to accrue to the public benefit.
Public Benefit. The degree to which NGO sponsorship of the proposed project would be more beneficial to the public-at-large or more advantageous to NYSDOT/State than would governmental sponsorship.
