Common use of Purchase Order Number Clause in Contracts

Purchase Order Number. Description of the Services Description of the deliverables Any additional Terms and Conditions Relevant documents: Specification/project Services proposal Date for Commencement Services Location/Site Date for Completion Service Provider Core Team Charges Retention % (if applicable) In accordance with the provisions of the Contract, you are instructed to proceed with the Services as identified above. The provision of the Services is to commence on the Date for Commencement (as noted above) and are to be completed by the Date for Completion (as noted above). In the event that the Date for Commencement and/or the Date for Completion is/are not noted above you should commence the Services without delay and proceed with the Services with due diligence and complete same in a timely manner. In undertaking the Services, as required under this Task Order, you are to comply with all requirements and the terms and conditions of the Mini-Competition Contract for Plumbing Services. SCHEDULE 5: PERFORMANCE EVALUATION REPORT Plumbing Services for Local Authorities Mini-Competition Performance Evaluation Details of Mini-Competition Lot No. : Lot 3 Plumbing Services (including gas works but excluding PSCS) Framework Purchaser: Framework Purchaser Contact Name: RFT Reference No.: Name of Service Provider: Service Provider Contact Name: Service Provider Ranking: Details of Contract Awarded: Total Out-turn Cost (incl. VAT): € Comments: Evaluation Completed By - Framework Purchaser Contact Name: Framework Purchaser Contact No: Framework Purchaser email address: Date of Review: Signature: Performance Evaluation of Plumbing Services for Local Authorities – Lot 3 Ratings: Excellent Very Good Good Moderate Poor Please give one rating for each criteria. Add comments as required to justify your rating. Evaluation Criteria Rating 1 Adherence to the specified Project Programme Did the Service Provider complete the works within the specified timeframe? Were any difficulties or delays encountered? Were these difficulties or delays within the control of the Service Provider or his Project Team? Comments 2 Quality of Workmanship Was the required work completed in a good workmanlike manner? Did the Project Team demonstrate a desire to complete the work to a high quality? Comments

Appears in 1 contract

Samples: Local Government Operational

AutoNDA by SimpleDocs

Purchase Order Number. Description of the Services Description of the deliverables Any additional Terms and Conditions Relevant documents: Specification/project Services proposal Date for Commencement Services Location/Site Date for Completion Service Provider Core Team Charges Retention % (if applicable) In accordance with the provisions of the Contract, you are instructed to proceed with the Services as identified above. The provision of the Services is to commence on the Date for Commencement (as noted above) and are to be completed by the Date for Completion (as noted above). In the event that the Date for Commencement and/or the Date for Completion is/are not noted above you should commence the Services without delay and proceed with the Services with due diligence and complete same in a timely manner. In undertaking the Services, as required under this Task Order, you are to comply with all requirements and the terms and conditions of the Mini-Competition Contract for Plumbing Electrical Services. SCHEDULE 5: PERFORMANCE EVALUATION REPORT Plumbing Electrical Services for Local Authorities Mini-Competition Performance Evaluation Details of Mini-Competition Lot No. : Lot 3 Plumbing 1 - Electrical Services (including gas works but excluding PSCS) without PSCS Framework Purchaser: Framework Purchaser Contact Name: RFT Reference No.: Name of Service Provider: Service Provider Contact Name: Service Provider Ranking: Details of Contract Awarded: Total Out-turn Cost (incl. VAT): € Comments: Evaluation Completed By - Framework Purchaser Contact Name: Framework Purchaser Contact No: Framework Purchaser email address: Date of Review: Signature: Performance Evaluation of Plumbing Electrical Services for Local Authorities – Lot 3 1 Ratings: Excellent Very Good Good Moderate Poor Please give one rating for each criteria. Add comments as required to justify your rating. Evaluation Criteria Rating 1 Adherence to the specified Project Programme Did the Service Provider complete the works within the specified timeframetimeframe ? Were any difficulties or delays encountered? Were these difficulties or delays within the control of the Service Provider or his Project TeamTeam ? Comments 2 Quality of Workmanship Was the required work completed in a good workmanlike mannermanner ? Did the Project Team demonstrate a desire to complete the work to a high qualityquality ? Comments

Appears in 1 contract

Samples: Local Government Operational

Purchase Order Number. Description of the Services Description of the deliverables Any additional Terms and Conditions Relevant documents: Specification/project Services proposal Date for Commencement Services Location/Site Date for Completion Service Provider Core Team Charges Retention % (if applicable) In accordance with the provisions of the Contract, you are instructed to proceed with the Services as identified above. The provision of the Services is to commence on the Date for Commencement (as noted above) and are to be completed by the Date for Completion (as noted above). In the event that the Date for Commencement and/or the Date for Completion is/are not noted above you should commence the Services without delay and proceed with the Services with due diligence and complete same in a timely manner. In undertaking the Services, as required under this Task Order, you are to comply with all requirements and the terms and conditions of the Mini-Competition Contract for Plumbing Services. SCHEDULE 5: PERFORMANCE EVALUATION REPORT Plumbing Services for Local Authorities Mini-Competition Performance Evaluation Details of Mini-Competition Lot No. : Lot 3 2 Plumbing Services (including excluding gas works but excluding including PSCS) Framework Purchaser: Framework Purchaser Contact Name: RFT Reference No.: Name of Service Provider: Service Provider Contact Name: Service Provider Ranking: Details of Contract Awarded: Total Out-turn Cost (incl. VAT): € Comments: Evaluation Completed By - Framework Purchaser Contact Name: Framework Purchaser Contact No: Framework Purchaser email address: Date of Review: Signature: Performance Evaluation of Plumbing Services for Local Authorities – Lot 3 2 Ratings: Excellent Very Good Good Moderate Poor Please give one rating for each criteria. Add comments as required to justify your rating. Evaluation Criteria Rating 1 Adherence to the specified Project Programme Did the Service Provider complete the works within the specified timeframe? Were any difficulties or delays encountered? Were these difficulties or delays within the control of the Service Provider or his Project Team? Comments 2 Quality of Workmanship Was the required work completed in a good workmanlike manner? Did the Project Team demonstrate a desire to complete the work to a high quality? Comments

Appears in 1 contract

Samples: Local Government Operational

Purchase Order Number. Description of the Services Description of the deliverables Any additional Terms and Conditions Relevant documents: Specification/project Services proposal Date for Commencement Services Location/Site Date for Completion Service Provider Core Team Charges Retention % (if applicable) In accordance with the provisions of the Contract, you are instructed to proceed with the Services as identified above. The provision of the Services is to commence on the Date for Commencement (as noted above) and are to be completed by the Date for Completion (as noted above). In the event that the Date for Commencement and/or the Date for Completion is/are not noted above you should commence the Services without delay and proceed with the Services with due diligence and complete same in a timely manner. In undertaking the Services, as required under this Task Order, you are to comply with all requirements and the terms and conditions of the Mini-Competition Contract for Plumbing Services. SCHEDULE 5: PERFORMANCE EVALUATION REPORT Plumbing Services for Local Authorities Mini-Competition Performance Evaluation Details of Mini-Competition Lot No. : Lot 3 1 Plumbing Services (including excluding gas works but & excluding PSCS) Framework Purchaser: Framework Purchaser Contact Name: RFT Reference No.: Name of Service Provider: Service Provider Contact Name: Service Provider Ranking: Details of Contract Awarded: Total Out-turn Cost (incl. VAT): € Comments: Evaluation Completed By - Framework Purchaser Contact Name: Framework Purchaser Contact No: Framework Purchaser email address: Date of Review: Signature: Performance Evaluation of Plumbing Services for Local Authorities – Lot 3 1 Ratings: Excellent Very Good Good Moderate Poor Please give one rating for each criteria. Add comments as required to justify your rating. Evaluation Criteria Rating 1 Adherence to the specified Project Programme Did the Service Provider complete the works within the specified timeframe? Were any difficulties or delays encountered? Were these difficulties or delays within the control of the Service Provider or his Project Team? Comments 2 Quality of Workmanship Was the required work completed in a good workmanlike manner? Did the Project Team demonstrate a desire to complete the work to a high quality? Comments

Appears in 1 contract

Samples: Local Government Operational

AutoNDA by SimpleDocs

Purchase Order Number. Description of the Services Description of the deliverables Any additional Terms and Conditions Relevant documents: Specification/project Services proposal Date for Commencement Services Location/Site Date for Completion Service Provider Core Team Charges Retention % (if applicable) In accordance with the provisions of the Contract, you are instructed to proceed with the Services as identified above. The provision of the Services is to commence on the Date for Commencement (as noted above) and are to be completed by the Date for Completion (as noted above). In the event that the Date for Commencement and/or the Date for Completion is/are not noted above you should commence the Services without delay and proceed with the Services with due diligence and complete same in a timely manner. In undertaking the Services, as required under this Task Order, you are to comply with all requirements and the terms and conditions of the Mini-Competition Contract for Plumbing Electrical Services. SCHEDULE 5: PERFORMANCE EVALUATION REPORT Plumbing Electrical Services for Local Authorities Mini-Competition Performance Evaluation Details of Mini-Competition Lot No. : Lot 3 Plumbing 2 - Electrical Services (including gas works but excluding PSCS) with PSCS Framework Purchaser: Framework Purchaser Contact Name: RFT Reference No.: Name of Service Provider: Service Provider Contact Name: Service Provider Ranking: Details of Contract Awarded: Total Out-turn Cost (incl. VAT): € Comments: Evaluation Completed By - Framework Purchaser Contact Name: Framework Purchaser Contact No: Framework Purchaser email address: Date of Review: Signature: Performance Evaluation of Plumbing Electrical Services for Local Authorities – Lot 3 2 Ratings: Excellent Very Good Good Moderate Poor Please give one rating for each criteria. Add comments as required to justify your rating. Evaluation Criteria Rating 1 Adherence to the specified Project Programme Did the Service Provider complete the works within the specified timeframetimeframe ? Were any difficulties or delays encountered? Were these difficulties or delays within the control of the Service Provider or his Project TeamTeam ? Comments 2 Quality of Workmanship Was the required work completed in a good workmanlike mannermanner ? Did the Project Team demonstrate a desire to complete the work to a high qualityquality ? Comments

Appears in 1 contract

Samples: Local Government Operational

Purchase Order Number. Description of the Services Description of the deliverables Any additional Terms and Conditions Relevant documents: Specification/project Services proposal Date for Commencement Services Location/Site Date for Completion Service Provider Core Team Charges Retention % (if applicable) In accordance with the provisions of the Contract, you are instructed to proceed with the Services as identified above. The provision of the Services is to commence on the Date for Commencement (as noted above) and are to be completed by the Date for Completion (as noted above). In the event that the Date for Commencement and/or the Date for Completion is/are not noted above you should commence the Services without delay and proceed with the Services with due diligence and complete same in a timely manner. In undertaking the Services, as required under this Task Order, you are to comply with all requirements and the terms and conditions of the Mini-Competition Contract for Plumbing Services. SCHEDULE 5: PERFORMANCE EVALUATION REPORT Plumbing Services for Local Authorities Mini-Competition Performance Evaluation Details of Mini-Competition Lot No. : Lot 3 4 Plumbing Services (including gas works but excluding and including PSCS) Framework Purchaser: Framework Purchaser Buyer Contact Name: RFT Reference No.: Name of Service Provider: Service Provider Contact Name: Service Provider Ranking: Details of Contract Awarded: Total Out-turn Cost (incl. VAT): € Comments: Evaluation Completed By - Framework Purchaser Contact Name: Framework Purchaser Contact No: Framework Purchaser email address: Date of Review: Signature: Performance Evaluation of Plumbing Services for Local Authorities – Lot 3 4 Ratings: Excellent Very Good Good Moderate Poor Please give one rating for each criteria. Add comments as required to justify your rating. Evaluation Criteria Rating 1 Adherence to the specified Project Programme Did the Service Provider complete the works within the specified timeframe? Were any difficulties or delays encountered? Were these difficulties or delays within the control of the Service Provider or his Project Team? Comments 2 Quality of Workmanship Was the required work completed in a good workmanlike manner? Did the Project Team demonstrate a desire to complete the work to a high quality? Comments

Appears in 1 contract

Samples: Local Government Operational

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.