Administrative data. Before the mobility, it is necessary to fill in page 1 with information on the student, the Sending and the Receiving Institutions. The three parties have to agree on this section to be completed before the mobility. On page 1, most of the information related to the student, Sending and Receiving Institutions will have to be encoded in the Mobility Tool+ (for Capacity Building projects, in the EACEA Mobility Tool).
Administrative data. Before the mobility, it is necessary to fill in page 1 with information on the trainee, the Sending Institution and the Receiving Organisation/Enterprise and the three parties have to agree on the section to be completed before the mobility. In case some administrative data is already available to the three parties, there is no need to repeat it in this template. On page 1, most of the information related to the trainee, the sending and Receiving Organisations will have to be encoded in the Mobility Tool+.
Administrative data. Before the mobility, it is necessary to fill in page 1 with information on the student, the Sending and the Receiving Institutions. The three parties have to agree on this section to be completed before the mobility. In case some administrative data is already available to the three parties, there is no need to repeat it in this template. On page 1, most of the information related to the student, Sending and Receiving Institutions will have to be encoded in the Mobility Tool+. The study programme includes the indicative start and end months of the agreed study programme that the student will carry out abroad. The Learning Agreement must include all the educational components to be carried out by the student at the Receiving Institution (in Table A) and it must contain as well the group of educational components that will be replaced in his/her degree by the Sending Institution (in Table B) upon successful completion of the study programme abroad. It is necessary to fill in Tables A and B thoroughly before the mobility. Additional rows and columns can be added as needed. However, the two Tables A and B must be kept separated. The objective is to make clear that there is no need to have one-to-one correspondence between the components followed abroad and the ones replaced at the Sending Institution. The aim is rather that a group of learning outcomes achieved abroad replaces a group of learning outcomes at the Sending Institution. In countries belonging to the European Higher Education Area (EHEA) an academic year of full-time study is normally made up of educational components totalling 60 ECTS credits. It is recommended that for mobility periods shorter than a full academic year, the educational components selected should equate to a roughly proportionate number of credits (or equivalent units in countries outside the EHEA). In case the student follows additional educational components beyond those required for his/her degree programme, these additional credits (or equivalent) must also be listed in the study programme outlined in Table A. In case of thesis research/doctoral work at the receiving institution, the component "Thesis research" or "Doctoral work" will be included in Table A. If no ECTS credits are provided by the receiving institution, it is sufficient to write "not applicable" in that column. The thesis/doctoral work and the associated workload in ECTS credits will be included in Table B, if relevant for the sending institution. The Sending I...
Administrative data. “Administrative Data” means information identifying and pertaining to Subscriber and its Users, such as User contact information, but which does not contain Patient Data or Subscriber’s Confidential Information, which Collective uses to manage and administer the Services and provide support to Subscriber and its Users. Collective may use and disclose Administrative Data for purposes of providing the Services to Network Participants, for the purposes set forth in the Terms of Use, for Collective’s proper management and administration, and as required by law.
Administrative data. Progress Payments: Based upon Applications for Payment submitted to the Project Manager by the Contractor and Certificates for Payment issued by the Project Manager the County shall make progress payments on account of the Contract Amount to the Contractor as provided in the Contract Documents as follows: Not later than 30 days following approval of an application for Payment, ninety percent (90%) of the portion of the Contract Amount properly allocable to labor, materials and equipment incorporated in the Work and ninety percent (90%) of the portion of the Contract Amount properly allocable to materials and equipment suitably stored at the site or at some other location agreed upon in writing, for the period covered by the application for payment, less the aggregate of previous payments made by the Owner. When the completion of the Work ascertained as payable exceeds fifty percent (50%) of the total contract amount the retainage percentage withheld shall be reduced to 5%. Upon Final completion of the entire Work, a sum sufficient to increase the total payments to one hundred percent (100%) of the Contract Amount, less such amounts as the Owner shall determine for all incomplete work and unsettled claims as provided in the Contract Documents. Should the Contractor fail to substantially complete all Work under this Contract and make the project available for beneficial use on or before the date stipulated for Substantial Completion (or such later date as may result from extension of time granted by County), he shall pay and/or the County may retain from the compensation otherwise to be paid to the Contractor, as liquidated damages, the sum of $500.00 for each consecutive calendar day that terms of the Contract remain unfulfilled beyond date allowed by the Contract, which sum is agreed upon as a reasonable and proper measure of damages which County will sustain per diem by failure of Contractor to complete work within time as stipulated; it being recognized by County and Contractor that the injury to County which could result from a failure of Contractor to complete on schedule is uncertain and cannot be computed exactly. In no way shall costs for liquidated damages be construed as a penalty on the Contractor. For each consecutive calendar day that the work remains incomplete after the date established for Final Completion, the County will retain from the compensation otherwise to be paid to the Contractor the sum of $500.00. This amount is the mutually agre...
Administrative data. 1.1 Making better use of existing data – Meta analysis
1.2 Standardising indicators / definitions across countries
1.3 Filling gaps in existing data
Administrative data. Data that results from administering health care delivery, enrolling members into health insurance plans, and reimbursing for services. Although the clinical content of Administrative Data includes only the demographic characteristics and diagnoses of patients and codes for procedures, this data is often used to evaluate the quality of health care. With some exceptions, Administrative Data allows limited insight into the quality of processes of care, errors of omission or commission, and the appropriateness of care. Administrative Data includes eligibility data, Claims data, Encounter Data, and Supplemental Data. Administrative Measure Rates – Performance measure rates that are generated using only Administrative Data. Assess – The process used to examine and determine the level of quality or the progress toward improvement of quality and/or performance related to CMO service delivery systems.
Administrative data. If you are not a Product Administrator or if the Content Owner has not otherwise authorized your access, any access you may have, by means of an Online Portal or otherwise, to Administrative Data related to such Product or its use, including but not limited to, Device or Product identification, usage amount, individual user identities, or Product or account settings may be used by you only for billing and product support purposes and will not otherwise be used or disclosed by you for any purpose.
Administrative data. Other than the information provided by the HNR in ordinary resolution requests, the collection of administrative data associated with each prefix is considered confidential by CNRI and will not be released in any form unless ordered by a court or governmental agency of competent jurisdiction, or unless otherwise agreed to in writing by the Parties. Administrative data, other than LHS's account information, that have been received by CNRI from LHS and are required to maintain the overall integrity of the HNR shall be retained in the HNR. LHS shall be solely responsible for the accuracy or completeness of any data or other information provided to the HNR by LHS.
Administrative data. Over the first two years of the program, 860 students submitted an application, were found to eligible, and received a disclosure. These students came from 125 different majors with a 6Participants are required to file US federal income taxes in each year of the income share agreement and are also required to file form 4506-T which gives Purdue access to the W-2 and 1099-MISC forms. wide range of grades. 442 students (51%) chose to participate while 418 chose an alternative way to pay their college expenses. In total, the university dispersed $5.7 million or about $13,000 per participant. Some students applied in both years and so are present in the data twice. In total there are 767 unique students. Table 1 provides summary statistics for the ISA applicants who were eligible for the ISA and received a disclosure. This includes both the ISA participants and non-participants. Summary statistics for the universe of sophomores, juniors, and seniors at Purdue during this time period are also provided for comparison. A greater fraction of the ISA applicants are under-represented minority students than for the student body at large. ISA applicants are also more likely to be first-generation students. Only domestic students are eligible for the program which explains why ISA applicants are less likely to be transfer students and less likely to be non-native English speakers than for the full student population. ISA applicants also tend to have a lower prior-year GPA and SAT scores than the average for Purdue students.7 Table 1 also compares the administrative variable means for the ISA participants and non-participants and reports the p-value for the t-test of equality of means. Overall, the ISA participants are very similar to the non-participants. They have similar SAT scores, are in majors that have similar average starting salaries and similar standard deviation of starting salary, have similar fractions of transfer students and students where English in not their first language. The ISA participants also seem to be in a very similar financial situation as the non-participants. Not only did they both qualify for the ISA, with a remaining financial need of at least $5,000, but they also were offered similar income share percentages (the rate per $10,000 of funding) and were found to be eligible for very similar funding amounts.8 Note also that all ISA applicants have federal student loans and have either hit the maximum 7There are large differences in grade di...
