BY THE COURT Sample Clauses

BY THE COURT. The court may dismiss an indictment, information, or complaint if unnec- xxxxxx delay occurs in:
Sample 1Sample 2Sample 3See All (4)
BY THE COURT. Xxxxxxxxx Xxxxxx X. Bucklo Dated: ______, 2006 EXHIBIT "B" IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION XXXXX X. XXXXXXXX, On Behalf of Herself : And All Others Similarly Situated, : No. 98-C-2178 : Plaintiff : Xxxxxxxxx Xxxxxx X. Bucklo : -against- : : HOUSEHOLD INTERNATIONAL, INC., : HOUSEHOLD BANK, f.s.b, successor in interest : to BENEFICIAL NATIONAL BANK, : HOUSEHOLD TAX MASTERS, INC., formerly : known as BENEFICIAL TAX MASTERS, INC., : BENEFICIAL FRANCHISE COMPANY, INC., : H&R BLOCK, INC., H&R BLOCK SERVICES, : INC., H&R BLOCK TAX SERVICES, INC., : H&R BLOCK EASTERN TAX SERVICES, INC., : BLOCK FINANCIAL CORP., and HRB : ROYALTY, INC., : : Defendants. : ORDER OF PRELIMINARY APPROVAL WITH RESPECT TO NOTICE, HEARING, AND ADMINISTRATION OF SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION
Sample 1
BY THE COURT. On 14 June 2022, the National Court at Waigani dismissed, with costs, three actions instituted by respectively, the First Appellant, Fulleborne Extension Business Group (Inc), the Second Appellant, Extended Mengen Extension Business Group (Inc), and the Third Appellant, Ania Sawmill Business Group (Inc) against the Papua New Guinea Forest Authority, the State and certain officials of the State. In the National Court, those actions were, respectively, WS 20 of 2020, instituted by Fulleborne instituted on 8 May 2020, WS 14 of 2020, instituted by Xxxxxx on 26 May 2020 and WS 4 of 2020, instituted by Xxxx on 31 May 2020.
Sample 1
BY THE COURT. District Court Judge * (This standard judicial order has been approved by the FPPA Board of Directors, as allowed by law.)
Sample 1
BY THE COURT. The agreement is to enter judgment for what may be due. The plaintiff has no right to decide the question. It is evident, from the terms of the agreement, that there was something to settle; and the plaintiff, either by arbitration, or by a jury, should have proceeded to make the settlement, with notice to the defendant, before he entered the judgment; or, at least before he issued the execution. The rule made absolute.
Sample 1
BY THE COURT. The Xxxxxxxxx Xxx X. Lindsay United States District Judge COUNSEL TO LONG RANGE SYSTEMS, INC. COUNSEL FOR NTN COMMUNICATIONS, INC. Xxxxxxx X. Xxxxxxxx Xxxxxxxx X. Xxxxxxx-Xxxxxxx Xxxxxxxx & Xxxxxxxx, LLP Texas Bar No. 10474900 The White House on Turtle Creek Xxxxx Liddell & Xxxx LLP 0000 Xxxxxx Xxxxx Xxxxxxxxx 0000 Xxxx Xxxxxx, Suite 2200 Dallas, TX 75219 Xxxxxx, Xxxxx 00000-0000 (000) 000-0000 000-000-0000 (Telephone) Fax: (000) 000-0000 000-000-0000 (Facsimile) By: By: --------------------------------- ----------------------------------- Xxxxxxx X. Xxxxxxxx Xxxxxxxx X. Xxxxxxx-Xxxxxxx Of Counsel: ----------- Xxxxx X. Xxxxxxxxx California Bar No. 137065 Xxxx X. Xxxxxx California Bar No. 197619 O'Melveny & Xxxxx LLP 000 Xxxxx Xxxx Xxxxxx Xxx Xxxxxxx, Xxxxxxxxxx 00000 000-000-0000 (Telephone) EXHIBIT B --------- XXXXX X. XXXXXXXXX (S.B. #137065) XXXX X. XXXXXX (S.B. #197619) O'MELVENY & XXXXX LLP 000 Xxxxx Xxxx Xxxxxx Xxx Xxxxxxx, Xxxxxxxxxx 00000 Telephone: (000) 000-0000 Facsimile: (000) 000-0000 Attorneys for Plaintiff, NTN COMMUNICATIONS, INC. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA NTN COMMUNICATIONS, INC., Case No. 03 CV 1042 LAB AJB Plaintiff, STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL
Sample 1

Related to BY THE COURT

  • Continuing Jurisdiction of the Court The Parties agree that, after entry of Judgment, the Court will retain jurisdiction over the Parties, Action, and the Settlement solely for purposes of (i) enforcing this Agreement and/or Judgment, (ii) addressing settlement administration matters, and (iii) addressing such post-Judgment matters as are permitted by law.

  • Application to Court If (i) a claim for indemnification or advancement of Expenses is denied, in whole or in part, (ii) no disposition of such claim is made by the Company within ninety (90) days after the request therefore, (iii) the advancement of Expenses is not timely made pursuant to Section 6 of this Agreement or (iv) payment of indemnification is not made pursuant to Section 5 of this Agreement, the Indemnitee shall have the right to apply to the Delaware Court of Chancery, the court in which the Proceeding is or was pending, or any other court of competent jurisdiction, for the purpose of enforcing the Indemnitee’s right to indemnification (including the advancement of Expenses) pursuant to this Agreement.

  • Exclusive Forum The state and federal courts having jurisdiction over Stanford, California, United States of America, provide the exclusive forum for any court action between the parties relating to this Agreement. ***** submits to the jurisdiction of such courts, and waives any claim that such a court lacks jurisdiction over ***** or constitutes an inconvenient or improper forum.

  • Exclusive Jurisdiction and Venue The parties agree that the Courts of the County of Orange, State of California shall have sole and exclusive jurisdiction and venue for the resolution of all disputes arising under the terms of this Agreement and the transactions contemplated herein.

  • Venue The Superior Court of California, located in the County of Sacramento, shall hear any dispute between the Parties arising from this Settlement Agreement.

  • Jurisdiction and Venue This Contract shall be construed in accordance with the laws of the State of California and the parties hereto agree that venue shall be in Marin County, California.

  • Governing Law; Exclusive Jurisdiction All questions concerning the construction, validity, enforcement and interpretation of the Transaction Documents shall be governed by and construed and enforced in accordance with the internal laws of the State of New York, without regard to the principles of conflicts of law thereof. Each party agrees that all legal Proceedings concerning the interpretations, enforcement and defense of the transactions contemplated by this Agreement and any other Transaction Documents (whether brought against a party hereto or its respective affiliates, directors, officers, shareholders, partners, members, employees or agents) shall be commenced exclusively in the state and federal courts sitting in the City of New York. Each party hereby irrevocably submits to the exclusive jurisdiction of the state and federal courts sitting in the City of New York, Borough of Manhattan for the adjudication of any dispute hereunder or in connection herewith or with any transaction contemplated hereby or discussed herein (including with respect to the enforcement of any of the Transaction Documents), and hereby irrevocably waives, and agrees not to assert in any Action or Proceeding, any claim that it is not personally subject to the jurisdiction of any such court, that such Action or Proceeding is improper or is an inconvenient venue for such Proceeding. Each party hereby irrevocably waives personal service of process and consents to process being served in any such Action or Proceeding by mailing a copy thereof via registered or certified mail or overnight delivery (with evidence of delivery) to such party at the address in effect for notices to it under this Agreement and agrees that such service shall constitute good and sufficient service of process and notice thereof. Nothing contained herein shall be deemed to limit in any way any right to serve process in any other manner permitted by law. If any party shall commence an Action or Proceeding to enforce any provisions of the Transaction Documents, then, in addition to the obligations of the Company elsewhere in this Agreement, the prevailing party in such Action or Proceeding shall be reimbursed by the non-prevailing party for its reasonable attorneys’ fees and other costs and expenses incurred with the investigation, preparation and prosecution of such Action or Proceeding.

  • Court ordered services and supplies including court-ordered care or testing, or services required as a condition of parole, probation, release or because of any legal proceeding.

  • Exclusive Jurisdiction; Venue All disputes that arise from or relate to this Agreement shall be decided exclusively by binding arbitration in Xxxx County, Illinois under the Commercial Arbitration Rules of the American Arbitration Association. The parties agree that the arbitrator’s award shall be final, and may be filed with and enforced as a final judgment by any court of competent jurisdiction. Notwithstanding the foregoing, any disputes related to the enforcement of the restrictive covenants contained in Section 9 of this Agreement shall be subject to and determined under Delaware law and adjudicated in Illinois courts.

  • Jurisdiction of Courts Québec hereby appoints the person from time to time who holds the position of Delegate General of Québec in New York, Xxx Xxxxxxxxxxx Xxxxx, 00xx xxxxx, Xxx Xxxx, Xxx Xxxx 00000-0000, as its authorized agent (the “Authorized Agent”) upon whom process may be served in any action by any Underwriter, or by any person controlling such Underwriter, and based upon this Agreement which may be instituted in any State or Federal court in The City of New York, and expressly accepts the non-exclusive jurisdiction of any such court in respect of such action. Québec hereby irrevocably waives any immunity to service of process in respect of any such action to which the Authorized Agent might otherwise be entitled. Such appointment shall be irrevocable as long as any of the Securities remain outstanding, except that, if for any reason the Authorized Agent ceases to be able to act as agent or no longer has an address in The City of New York, Québec will appoint another person or persons in The City of New York, selected in its discretion, as Authorized Agent(s). Québec will take any and all action, including the filing of any and all documents and instruments that may be necessary to continue such appointment or appointments in full force and effect as aforesaid. Service of process upon the Authorized Agent together with written notice of such service mailed or delivered to Québec at its address set forth in Section 11, shall be deemed in every respect effective service of process upon Québec. Notwithstanding the foregoing, any action by an Underwriter, or by any person controlling such Underwriter, and based upon this Agreement may be instituted in any competent court in Québec. Québec hereby waives, to the fullest extent permitted by applicable law, any immunity to jurisdiction to which it might otherwise be entitled in any action based on this Agreement which may be instituted as provided in this Section in any State or Federal court in The City of New York or in any competent court in Québec.