Contaminated Land. The maximum the Underwriter will pay for all claims relating to a Housing Unit under Section 3.4 of the Policy is £250,000 or the Sum Insured for the Housing Unit, whichever is the lesser. The Financial Limit under Section 3.4 for any one New Development is £20,000,000.
Contaminated Land. The Underwriter will indemnify the Policyholder against all claims discovered and notified to the Underwriter during the Structural Insurance Period in respect of Remediation Expenses incurred in treating or isolating or removing any substance from the Policyholder’s Land in a controlled manner in accordance with the requirements of any Statutory Notice.
Contaminated Land. There is not present in, on, at or under the Properties and there is no deposit, disposal, spillage, leakage, emission, migration, escape, entry, discharge or other release onto or from the Properties or caused by the Activities or caused or knowingly permitted by any Group Company of any Hazardous Material and no Property is referred to in any register of contaminated land kept pursuant to any Environmental Law, and, so far as the Seller is aware, there are no circumstances which may reasonably be expected to lead to any material obligation or liability in relation to such matters.
Contaminated Land. As far as Xxxxxx is aware there is not present on, at or under the Properties and there is and has been no release, migration, leakage, spill, discharge, entry, deposit or emission onto or from the Properties of any Hazardous Substance or Waste.
Contaminated Land. To the best of the Sellers' information knowledge and belief there is not present on, at or under the Property and there is and has been no release, migration, leakage, spill, discharge, entry, deposit or emission onto or from the Property of any Hazardous Substance or Waste. As far as the Sellers are aware there has not been any disposal, storage, release, leakage, migration, spill, discharge, entry, deposit or emission of any Hazardous Substance or Waste into the Environment caused by the Activities.
Contaminated Land. (a) To the best of the Warrantor's knowledge and belief but on the basis that the Warrantor has made no enquiries relating thereto there has not been and there is not present on, at or under the Property and there is and has been no release, migration, leakage, spill, discharge, entry, deposit or emission onto or from the Property of any Hazardous Substance or Waste.
(b) To the best of the Warrantor's knowledge and belief there has not been any disposal, storage, release, leakage, migration, spill, discharge, entry, deposit or emission of any Hazardous Substance or Waste into the Environment caused by the Activities.
Contaminated Land. 3 Control........................................................................3
Contaminated Land. 3.10.2.1 The land contamination assessment at the concerned previously developed land lot is currently occupied by PCCW and a short section of Xxxxxx Xxx Street. As there were no exceedances of the criteria for the land contamination for the Trunk Road T2 project, there would be no adverse impacts due to land contamination anticipated. There were 2 locations at Xxxxxx Xxx Street, namely EH1 and EH3, at which the site investigation (SI) works for the land contamination assessment were not practically accessible. As such, in future, if the concerned locations are confirmed to be acquired as part of the works sites for the Trunk Road T2 construction contract and access is permitted, a supplementary SI to complete the land contamination assessment for EH1 and EH3 and further reconnaissance visits to inaccessible Works Area WA2 would be conducted when these sites become accessible in accordance with the requirements as set out in the endorsed CAP prior to the commencement of construction works so as to verify if any potential land contamination issues exist in these remaining areas. The findings of such supplementary SI works would be submitted as supplementary information to the CAR. If land contamination is determined, the necessary remediation works will be proposed in a RAP for implementation. Following the completion of remaining SI works at locations EH1 and EH3, a supplementary CAR and/or RAP will be submitted to EPD for approval before the commencement of construction works.
Contaminated Land. Except as set forth on Schedule B Part 3.22, there is no contamination of soil or groundwater by Hazardous Materials at, on, under, within or migrating from a facility or site owned, used or occupied by a Target Company or Company Subsidiary as of the date of this Stock Purchase Agreement (or to the Knowledge of Parent, owned, used or occupied by a Target Company or Company Subsidiary during the five-year period prior to the date of this Stock Purchase Agreement), which contamination requires investigation, remediation, or other response or action pursuant to Environmental Law, except for such remediation or response as would not, individually or in the aggregate, be likely to result in expenditure in excess of $500,000.
Contaminated Land. In Germany there is not a tradition in the analysis of such scapes, being the planning an umbrella framework which define generally the functions and the future development visions. When it comes to practical implementation of the visions, local and detailed plans are developed (B-Plan). The urban planning system of Germany and specifically of Hamburg, have been explained in D6.2 (REPAiR, 2018c). The lack of these data is also due to the zero-landfill policies applied in Germany at the end of the 90’s. Moreover, the most current empty spaces within the city have already and implementation plan for the near future. Some areas in Hamburg are indeed contaminated, but those are situated in the South-East part of the state. Therefore, the wastescapes have been individuated by collecting information at the European level from the Urban Atlas website: this is valid for the layers of “land without use” and “abandoned productive site”, for instance. The proximity to the port area of the focus area is the reason for the presence of chemicals in the water, although concentrations are not high. The activities of the Hamburg airport are contributing to the noise pollution in the eastern part of the FA. The 42 railways which now figure in the map of Figure 3.8 are currently disused, but a new development of the area which comprehends a re-organisation of the metro and trains traffic has already started. As described in D3.3, “from an urban perspective, the construction of a Wastescape map visualises the unexpected results of urban growth though, unfortunately without providing additional information to the expert eyes of local urban planners and administrators” (REPAiR 2018b: 57). However, in a Circular Economy perspective the temporary and the long-term use of each of these areas can be important. The map will be than the base for discussion on solutions during the PULL meeting with the local stakeholders.
