Contractual indicators Sample Clauses

Contractual indicators. The following table shows the performance indicators specified for Malgaro Kor Project by UNHCR. Counseling Performance Targeting Indicators Psychological cases or individual therapy sessions/month 50 Workshops/month 2 Group Therapy Sessions/month 10 Referrals/month 100 Community visits/week 4 8 | P a g e Following table highlights all the MK centers performance throughout the life of MK Project; S/No. MK Center Psychological cases Referred cases Group sessions Workshops/ campaigns Community visits Achieved Overall Achieved /month Target Achieved Overall Achieved /month Target /month Achieved Overall Achieved /month Target /month Achieved Overall Achieved /month Target /month Achieved Overall Achieved /week Target /week 1 Kanju 873 48.5 50 3041 169 100 523 29 10 69 1 2 274 3.8 4 2 X.xxxxx 643 40.2 50 994 62.12 100 455 28.4 10 28 0.5 2 248 3.9 4 3 Barikot 691 43.2 50 700 43.8 100 403 25.1 10 43 2.6 2 248 3.9 4 4 Ghalegay 394 24.62 50 439 27.4 100 327 20.4 10 26 1.6 2 197 12.3 4 5 Shin 323 27 50 564 47 100 415 8.65 10 25 2.08 2 197 4.1 4 6 Madyan 437 39.7 50 920 83.63 100 33 3 10 24 2.2 2 186 4.22 4 7 Bahrain 164 27.3 50 374 62.3 100 22 3.7 10 25 4.16 2 95 3.96 4 TOTAL 3,525 7,005 578 240 1,445 Average performance of MK centers against targeted indicators on per monthly basis; S/No. MK Center Name Psychological cases per month Referred cases per month Group sessions per month Workshops/ campaigns per month Community visits/Week 1 Kanju 48.5 169 29 1 3.8 2 Khawazakhela 40.2 62.12 28.4 0.5 3.9 3 Barikot 43.3 43.8 25.1 2.6 3.9 4 Ghalegay 24.62 27.4 20.4 1.6 12.3 5 Shin 27 47 8.65 2.08 4.1 6 Madyan 39.7 83.63 3 2.2 4.22 7 Bahrain 27.3 62.3 3.7 4.16 3.96 Targeted indicators 50 100 10 2 4
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs

Related to Contractual indicators

  • MSAA Indicator Technical Specification Document This Agreement shall be interpreted with reference to the MSAA Indicator Technical Specifications document.

  • Performance indicators and targets The purpose of the innovation performance indicators and targets is to assist the University and the Commonwealth in monitoring the University's progress against the Commonwealth's objectives and the University's strategies for innovation. The University will report principal performance information and aim to meet the innovation performance indicators and targets set out in the following tables.

  • SHOP DRAWINGS, PRODUCT DATA AND SAMPLES 4.12.1 Shop Drawings are drawings, diagrams, schedules and other, data specially prepared for the Work by the Contractor or any Subcontractor, manufacturer, supplier or distributor to illustrate some portion of the Work.

  • Performance Indicators The HSP’s delivery of the Services will be measured by the following Indicators, Targets and where applicable Performance Standards. In the following table: n/a meanç ‘not-appIicabIe’, that there iç no defined Performance Standard for the indicator for the applicable year. tbd means a Target, and a Performance Standard, if applicable, will be determined during the applicable year. INDICATOR CATEGORY INDICATOR P = Performance Indicator E = Explanatory Indicator M = Monitoring Indicator 2019/20 PERFORMANCE TARGET STANDARD Organizational Health and Financial Indicators Debt Service Coverage Ratio (P) 1 c1 Total Margin (P) 0 cO Coordination and Access Indicators Percent Resident Days – Long Stay (E) n/a n/a Wait Time from LHIN Determination of Eligibility to LTC Home Response (M) n/a n/a Long-Term Care Home Refusal Rate (E) n/a n/a SCHEDULE D — PERFORMANCE 2/3 INDICATOR CATEGORY Quality and Resident Safety Indicators INDICATOR P = Performance Indicator E = Explanatory Indicator M = Monitoring Indicator Percentage of Residents Who Fell in the Last 30 days (M) 2019/20 PERFORMANCE TARGET STANDARD n/a n/a Percentage of Residents Whose Pressure Ulcer Worsened (M) n/a n/a Percentage of Residents on Antipsychotics Without a Diagnosis of Psychosis (M) n/a n/a Percentage of Residents in Daily Physical Restraints (M) n/a n/a SCHEDULE D — PERFORMANCE 2.0 LHIN-Specific Performance Obligations 3/3

  • Project Scope The physical scope of the Project shall be limited to only those capital improvements as described in Appendix A of this Agreement. In the event that circumstances require a change in such physical scope, the change must be approved by the District Committee, recorded in the District Committee's official meeting minutes, and provided to the OPWC Director for the execution of an amendment to this Agreement.

  • Geographical Indications 1. Each Party shall recognise that geographical indications may be protected through a trade xxxx or sui generis system or other legal means in accordance with its laws and regulations.

  • Target Population The Grantee shall ensure that diversion programs and services provided under this grant are designed to serve juvenile offenders who are at risk of commitment to Department.

  • Power Factor Design Criteria (Reactive Power A wind generating plant shall maintain a power factor within the range of 0.95 leading to 0.95 lagging, measured at the Point of Interconnection as defined in this LGIA, if the ISO’s System Reliability Impact Study shows that such a requirement is necessary to ensure safety or reliability. The power factor range standards can be met using, for example without limitation, power electronics designed to supply this level of reactive capability (taking into account any limitations due to voltage level, real power output, etc.) or fixed and switched capacitors if agreed to by the Connecting Transmission Owner for the Transmission District to which the wind generating plant will be interconnected, or a combination of the two. The Developer shall not disable power factor equipment while the wind plant is in operation. Wind plants shall also be able to provide sufficient dynamic voltage support in lieu of the power system stabilizer and automatic voltage regulation at the generator excitation system if the System Reliability Impact Study shows this to be required for system safety or reliability.

  • Power Factor Design Criteria Developer shall design the Large Generating Facility to maintain an effective power delivery at demonstrated maximum net capability at the Point of Interconnection at a power factor within the range established by the Connecting Transmission Owner on a comparable basis, until NYISO has established different requirements that apply to all generators in the New York Control Area on a comparable basis. The Developer shall design and maintain the plant auxiliary systems to operate safely throughout the entire real and reactive power design range. The Connecting Transmission Owner shall not unreasonably restrict or condition the reactive power production or absorption of the Large Generating Facility in accordance with Good Utility Practice.

  • Development Milestones In addition to its obligations under Paragraph 7.1, LICENSEE specifically commits to achieving the following development milestones in its diligence activities under this AGREEMENT: (a) (b).

Draft better contracts in just 5 minutes Get the weekly Law Insider newsletter packed with expert videos, webinars, ebooks, and more!