Correspondence to Clause Samples
The 'Correspondence to' clause defines the designated address or method by which official communications, notices, or documents related to the agreement must be sent between the parties. Typically, this clause specifies physical mailing addresses, email addresses, or other approved channels for correspondence, and may outline requirements for delivery confirmation or updates to contact information. Its core practical function is to ensure that all parties have a clear, agreed-upon method for exchanging important information, thereby reducing the risk of missed communications and potential disputes over whether notice was properly given.
Correspondence to. Dr I Abubakar, CDSC Eastern, IPH ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇ ▇▇▇, ▇▇; ibrahim. ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇@▇▇▇.▇▇▇.▇▇ Accepted for publication 20 October 2003
Correspondence to. ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇ ▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇, Department of Community and Family Medicine, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, 4/F, School of Public Health, Prince of Wales Hospital, Shatin, NT, Hong Kong; ▇▇▇▇▇▇@▇▇▇▇.▇▇▇.▇▇ Accepted 12 September 2002 .......................
Correspondence to. ▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇, Department of Neurology, St Elisabeth Hospital, PO Box 90151, 5000 ▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇, The Netherlands; ▇.▇▇▇▇▇▇▇@▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇.▇▇ Received 31 March 2003 In revised form 22 June 2003 Accepted 28 June 2003 .......................
Correspondence to. Dr S ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇, Department of Cardiology, ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ Hospital, ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇, ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇ ▇▇▇, ▇▇; ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇@▇▇▇▇▇▇▇.▇▇▇. uk Submitted 20 February 2005 Accepted 6 April 2005
Correspondence to. ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇. ▇▇▇▇▇; email: ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇.▇▇▇▇▇@▇▇▇- ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇.▇▇ Key words: Liver—Computer tomography—Pseudolesion—Histology Abbreviations CT Computed tomography MRI Magnetic resonance imaging PAS Periodic acid Schiff HE Hematoxylin and eosin EVG ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇ Hounsfield unit PMI Post-mortem interval ICC Intraclass correlation coefficient Hepatic localized hypodense attenuating areas (so called ‘pseudolesions’) at the right side of the falciform liga- ment are not uncommon on computed tomography (CT) in non-cirrhotic, healthy livers [1–3] (Figs. 1, 2, 3). Mis- interpretation of pseudolesions may have severe impact on the choice of treatment, especially in patients suffer- ing from primary liver cancer or possible liver metas- tases. Recognition of these pseudolesions, therefore, is of high importance in daily radiological practice. Recogni- tion can be improved by understanding the pathohisto- logical origin of the parafissural pseudolesion. There are several hypotheses concerning the cause of the liver pseudolesions. The pseudolesions show a typical pattern in different phases of inflow of intravenous contrast material. In unenhanced or arterial phase im- ages the pseudolesion is not often identified [2]. In portal venous phase CT the parafissural pseudolesions have been described more often, in approximately 20% of cases [1–3]. This may be explained by the vascular hy- pothesis meaning that a ‘third inflow’ of blood from the
Correspondence to. ▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇ Vernon, Eye, Ear, Nose and Throat Centre, Queen’s ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇, ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇, ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇ ▇▇▇, ▇▇; ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇_▇▇▇▇▇▇@▇▇▇▇▇▇▇.▇▇▇ Accepted for publication 25 July 2001 .......................
Correspondence to. ▇▇ ▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇, Department of Family Medicaid insurance dataset Medicine, Oregon Health and Science University, ▇▇▇▇ ▇▇ ▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ Park Rd, Portland, OR 97329, USA; ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇@▇▇▇▇.▇▇▇ Received 13 September 2013 Revised 23 December 2013 Accepted 20 January 2014 Published Online First 7 February 2014 To cite: ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ J, ▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇, ▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇, et al. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2014;21:720–724. BACKGROUND AND SIGNIFICANCE Healthcare organizations are increasingly required to measure and report the quality of care they deliver, for regulatory and reimbursement pur- poses.1–5 Such quality evaluations are often based on insurance claims data,6–8 which have been shown to accurately identify patients with certain diagnoses,9–12 but to be less accurate in identifying services provided, compared to other data sources.6–8 13 14
Correspondence to. Professor ▇-▇ ▇▇▇▇▇, Department of Emergency Medicine, Western Hospital, Private Bag, Footscray 3011 Australia; ▇▇▇▇-▇▇▇▇▇.▇▇▇▇▇@▇▇. ▇▇▇.▇▇ Accepted for publication 21 April 2006 .......................
Correspondence to. ▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇
Correspondence to. Dr ▇ ▇ ▇ ▇ ▇▇▇ ▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇, Department of Pathology 437 PA, University Medical Center, St Radboud, PO Box 9101, 6500 HB Nijmegen, The Netherlands; ▇.▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇@▇▇▇▇▇▇.▇▇▇.▇▇ Accepted for publication 28 January 2002 ....................... A