{"component": "clause", "props": {"groups": [{"samples": [{"hash": "dTB8SBNJloe", "uri": "/contracts/dTB8SBNJloe#december-2000", "label": "Pooling and Servicing Agreement (Norwest Asset Sec Corp Mort Pass THR Cert Ser 1998- 15 Trust)", "score": 18.0, "published": true}], "size": 2, "snippet": "61.80524306 May 2002............ 21.34207704 August 1999......... 95.60538313 January 2001........ 59.", "snippet_links": [{"key": "january-2001", "type": "clause", "offset": [78, 90]}], "hash": "e019b655dac9e04722659c34dd8bee9f", "id": 1}, {"samples": [{"hash": "5xS5Y6dYgRP", "uri": "/contracts/5xS5Y6dYgRP#december-2000", "label": "Long Term Supply Agreement (Cor Therapeutics Inc / De)", "score": 18.0, "published": true}], "size": 1, "snippet": "This Agreement shall automatically renew thereafter in one (1) year increments until terminated pursuant to Article 9.2.", "snippet_links": [{"key": "this-agreement", "type": "clause", "offset": [0, 14]}, {"key": "pursuant-to-article", "type": "clause", "offset": [96, 115]}], "hash": "c0b8e484dd89c4de267a5682c5bc1178", "id": 2}, {"samples": [{"hash": "lXPQt5fH6PY", "uri": "/contracts/lXPQt5fH6PY#december-2000", "label": "Capacity Sales Agreement (Telemonde Inc)", "score": 13.0, "published": true}], "size": 1, "snippet": "The above sums will be first utilised first in paying off the outstanding interest, with the balance being applied to pay off part of the principal. On or before 29 December 2000, it is agreed that representatives of Gemini and Carrier User will meet to seek to agree a mutually acceptable accelerated repayment schedule in respect of the balance of the Outstanding Sums. For the avoidance of doubt:", "snippet_links": [{"key": "paying-off", "type": "clause", "offset": [47, 57]}, {"key": "outstanding-interest", "type": "definition", "offset": [62, 82]}, {"key": "the-balance", "type": "clause", "offset": [89, 100]}, {"key": "pay-off", "type": "clause", "offset": [118, 125]}, {"key": "the-principal", "type": "definition", "offset": [134, 147]}, {"key": "it-is-agreed-that", "type": "clause", "offset": [180, 197]}, {"key": "representatives-of", "type": "clause", "offset": [198, 216]}, {"key": "repayment-schedule", "type": "definition", "offset": [302, 320]}, {"key": "in-respect-of", "type": "clause", "offset": [321, 334]}, {"key": "balance-of-the", "type": "clause", "offset": [339, 353]}, {"key": "for-the-avoidance-of-doubt", "type": "clause", "offset": [372, 398]}], "hash": "daa32a5cee71c8cc22cd8a6546006614", "id": 3}, {"samples": [{"hash": "lNwGRFoA4UW", "uri": "/contracts/lNwGRFoA4UW#december-2000", "label": "Share Purchase Agreement (Insignia Financial Group Inc /De/)", "score": 18.0, "published": true}], "size": 1, "snippet": "The parties to the Property Management Joint Venture did not reach an agreement before 31 December 2000. No formal and written amendment to the Property Management Joint Venture has been executed to extend the time limit granted to reach a final agreement on the terms still to be agreed. As a result of the above and according to the latest discussions between GFF and Bourdais, GFF and Bourdais have agreed on the sale of SPGI and \u2587\u2587\u2587\u2587\u2587\u2587 & Bourdais to GFF. GFF and Bourdais intend to enter into new discussions as soon as possible with the Buyer in view of agreeing on the terms and conditions of a new property management joint venture agreement.", "snippet_links": [{"key": "the-parties", "type": "definition", "offset": [0, 11]}, {"key": "property-management", "type": "definition", "offset": [19, 38]}, {"key": "an-agreement", "type": "clause", "offset": [67, 79]}, {"key": "no-formal", "type": "clause", "offset": [105, 114]}, {"key": "amendment-to-the", "type": "clause", "offset": [127, 143]}, {"key": "to-extend", "type": "clause", "offset": [196, 205]}, {"key": "time-limit", "type": "clause", "offset": [210, 220]}, {"key": "granted-to", "type": "definition", "offset": [221, 231]}, {"key": "final-agreement", "type": "definition", "offset": [240, 255]}, {"key": "according-to", "type": "definition", "offset": [318, 330]}, {"key": "discussions-between", "type": "clause", "offset": [342, 361]}, {"key": "have-agreed", "type": "clause", "offset": [397, 408]}, {"key": "sale-of", "type": "clause", "offset": [416, 423]}, {"key": "to-enter", "type": "definition", "offset": [483, 491]}, {"key": "as-soon-as-possible", "type": "definition", "offset": [513, 532]}, {"key": "the-buyer", "type": "clause", "offset": [538, 547]}, {"key": "in-view-of", "type": "definition", "offset": [548, 558]}, {"key": "terms-and-conditions-of", "type": "clause", "offset": [575, 598]}, {"key": "new-property", "type": "clause", "offset": [601, 613]}, {"key": "joint-venture-agreement", "type": "clause", "offset": [625, 648]}], "hash": "5796e27299463fcd4937d27114d0ca98", "id": 4}, {"samples": [{"hash": "7ktgLSM88IV", "uri": "/contracts/7ktgLSM88IV#december-2000", "label": "Research and Licence Agreement (Chemgenex Pharmaceuticals LTD)", "score": 17.0, "published": true}], "size": 1, "snippet": "Yeast 2 hybrid screen - isolation of full length clones of interacting partners, sequencing, subcloning into expression vectors. Expression and purification - recombinant 6XHis-B55 fusion proteins. Recombinant protein production at Silenus. PAbs - begin immunizing rabbits with recombinant B55. Adenoviral expression - production of B55 adenoviral stocks in 293A cells. In vitro functional studies with B55 Adenovirus. Localization studies by immunohistochemistry. Co-expression and co-immunoprecipitation - B55 and the candidate interacting partners. Signaling pathway - set up assays to analyze downstream signaling events. GST-pull down assays with C- and N-terminal recombinant B55 fragments - identify other strongly interacting proteins. A second Y2H screen to isolate other interacting clones from human liver cDNA library. Cloning and expression of B55 promoter. Studies with Biacore - fractionation of tissue homogenates by chromatography methods - test for interaction with immobilized B55. To further characterize the B55 interacting partners and their functional roles. Continue with B55 promoter studies. Set up high through put assays for drug screening based on either B55 promoter driven reporter activity or interaction between B55 and one of the interacting partners. Preliminary ICV infusion studies with chemically synthesized peptide. Immunization of rabbits with KLH-H24 conjugates. Further ICV infusion studies to analyze the dose dependent effects. ICV infusion of A, B and C animals - to study the differences in response to treatments with peptide. To analyze the test bleeds from rabbits for effective immune response.", "snippet_links": [{"key": "in-vitro", "type": "definition", "offset": [370, 378]}, {"key": "the-candidate", "type": "definition", "offset": [516, 529]}, {"key": "drug-screening", "type": "clause", "offset": [1153, 1167]}, {"key": "based-on", "type": "clause", "offset": [1168, 1176]}, {"key": "immune-response", "type": "definition", "offset": [1629, 1644]}], "hash": "ffcccf609837042e6edfdce1ed40f436", "id": 5}, {"samples": [{"hash": "1KplZjfRlhm", "uri": "/contracts/1KplZjfRlhm#december-2000", "label": "Master Purchase Agreement (Triton Management Co Inc)", "score": 18.0, "published": true}], "size": 1, "snippet": "If Triton has taken delivery 80% of the units within the specified period, \u2587\u2587\u2587\u2587\u2587\u2587\u2587 shall grant a three month (3) grace period on the balance of Systems. Cancellation cost of $23,000 per system against minimum quantity Order of 200 in FY 2001. Payable on 30", "snippet_links": [{"key": "the-units", "type": "clause", "offset": [36, 45]}, {"key": "specified-period", "type": "definition", "offset": [57, 73]}, {"key": "grace-period", "type": "definition", "offset": [113, 125]}, {"key": "the-balance", "type": "clause", "offset": [129, 140]}, {"key": "cost-of", "type": "definition", "offset": [166, 173]}, {"key": "minimum-quantity", "type": "definition", "offset": [201, 217]}, {"key": "order-of", "type": "clause", "offset": [218, 226]}], "hash": "b59673a8214450f02987f4b00ce4c280", "id": 6}, {"samples": [{"hash": "aNB1AGvTxUg", "uri": "/contracts/aNB1AGvTxUg#december-2000", "label": "Enterprise Licensing Agreement", "score": 16.0, "published": true}], "size": 1, "snippet": "General Services attempts to negotiate a volume purchase agreement with Oracle, but these negotiations are unsuccessful. According to DOIT, the enterprise work group\u2014comprised of members of DOIT, the state data centers, and occasionally attended by other state agencies, including General Services and Finance\u2014reaches a consensus that the State leverage its purchasing power for Oracle and Computer Associates products, both widely used in state and local government, by purchasing at a volume discount rate. The work group verbally recommends that the State employ a more beneficial contracting method, but does not specify a type of purchasing vehicle. Logicon makes the first of several presentations to DOIT and other state agencies regarding enterprise software solutions and the relative merits of various acquisition methods including ELAs. DOIT sends out its survey to all state, city, and county chief information offiicers, asking for information on their usage of all Oracle products and possible interest and participation in a statewide, pooled acquisition of Oracle software. Logicon presents its proposal on the Oracle software cost reduction initiative. Initially it estimates savings of over $114 million could result from an ELA. \u2587\u2587\u2587\u2587\u2587\u2587\u2587 states that a contract must be signed by May 31, 2001. This is the first Logicon presentation attended by Finance's Technology Investment Review Unit (TIRU). DOIT issues a management memo on its IT acquisition policy, focusing on IT acquisition planning and oversight processes. The policy highlights the importance of asset management strategies to take full advantage of savings from enterprise volume purchase agreements. TIRU forwards its concerns about the ELA to the directors of Finance and DOIT. These concerns include: \u2022 None of the assumptions or cost savings projections are validated. \u2022 Entering into the contract may create a de facto standard. \u2022 A cost allocation model has not been developed. \u2022 Logicon's contract model, taken from a federal model, may not be appropriate for California. \u2022 A process must be created for the ELA and someone must be responsible and take ownership of the proposal. DOIT forwards TIRU's concerns to Logicon to address. \u2022 Logicon submits a draft contract to General Services. \u2022 Logicon provides copies of purchase orders of the State's historical spending on Oracle database licenses and maintenance to TIRU, DOIT, and General Services. \u2022 General Services asks DOIT to review the purchase orders and determine whether \u2587\u2587\u2587\u2587\u2587\u2587\u2587's compilation accurately reflects Oracle database purchases. \u2022 DOIT reviews Oracle's purchase order amounts against copies of the purchase orders Logicon provides and totals the amounts of state purchases of Oracle database products for the past three fiscal years. DOIT also reviews the purchase orders and verbally informs General Services that they appear to be from or connected with state departments. According to \u2587\u2587\u2587\u2587, DOIT agrees to take the lead in formally presenting the Oracle database proposal. Logicon presents its proposal to the director of E-Government, Office of the Governor. The director raises an issue about the State's future obligations for Oracle database. Logicon responds on May 24 that General Services has committed to review the State's existing multiyear financing obligations to Oracle and the impact on the ELA license. Logicon states that any pre-existing commitments should be honored and the resulting credit be provided as part of the proposed ELA. DOlT, Finance, and General Services decide that a sole-source contract could only be executed with Oracle, not with Logicon. General Services drafts the formal proposal for acquiring Oracle database licenses and forwards it to Logicon for review and comment. DOlT composes part of the draft, including totaling the cost savings projections. DOlT e-mails General Services and Logicon, stating, \"We need to validate the proposal,\" per TlRU. The e-mail also indicates that both DOlT and General Services need more information to present in their recommendation to proceed with the Oracle ELA. General Services concurs with DOlT and asks \u2587\u2587\u2587\u2587\u2587\u2587\u2587 to explain how it calculated the estimated cost for maintenance shown in the proposal. General Services and DOlT jointly submit a draft proposal for the Oracle ELA to Finance and formally recommend that Finance evaluate its merits. Finance considers this to be an official request to evaluate the ELA proposal. DOlT forwards its responses to TlRU's concerns of May 10, 2001, regarding the ELA. DOlT informs TlRU that it has partnered with General Services to sponsor a consolidated purchase of Oracle database licenses to provide best pricing and terms for the State. DOlT states that its sponsorship relates to its responsibility, as laid out in its charter, to identify and implement best practices in lT management, including acquiring software under terms that yield maximum benefit and flexibility to the State. DOlT states that such terms for acquiring software can only be negotiated by leveraging the aggregate purchasing power of the State. After receiving DOlT's responses to its concerns, TlRU notifies the director of Finance that while the proposal may have merit, there are several issues the State should consider before entering into the Oracle ELA contract, such as the following: \u2022 Neither DOlT nor General Services seems to have conducted any analysis of the proposal. \u2022 A primary risk for the State is that it will enter into a fixed-price contract for [$94.6 million], paid in [five] payments over [six] fiscal years, with no assurance the benefits will materialize or can be captured. \u2022 No budgeting model exists that can be used to support this contract. \u2022 How existing state contracts with Oracle would be handled has not been defined. \u2022 The contract could create a de facto standard within the State for Oracle products. TlRU states that sufficient information has not been presented to assess the ELA proposal. TlRU advises that, should the State decide to enter into the contract, it should be on a policy basis with the understanding that an evaluation of the ELA contract's merits has not been completed. DOlT, General Services, and Finance agree that the State should enter a sole-source ELA with Oracle. General Services executes a contract with Oracle to license up to 270,000 users of enterprise database software and related maintenance for six years, and obtain 100,000 universal power units at a cost of $94.6 million. The contract also includes options for an additional four years of maintenance at $7 million per year. Logicon and Oracle enter into two side agreements related to the ELA. One designates Logicon to provide expert on-site support services. The other designates Logicon as the preferred leasing agent. (See Appendix C for details.) DOlT issues a management memo on software management policy, requiring all state departments within six months to plan an inventory of their software and to report the results to DOlT as of January 31, 2003. Finance notifies the Legislature of the State's contract with Oracle, executed by General Services on May 31, 2001. Finance, DOIT, and General Services meet to discuss how to proceed with implementing the contract.", "snippet_links": [{"key": "general-services", "type": "clause", "offset": [0, 16]}, {"key": "to-negotiate", "type": "definition", "offset": [26, 38]}, {"key": "volume-purchase", "type": "clause", "offset": [41, 56]}, {"key": "according-to", "type": "definition", "offset": [121, 133]}, {"key": "the-enterprise", "type": "clause", "offset": [140, 154]}, {"key": "work-group", "type": "definition", "offset": [155, 165]}, {"key": "members-of", "type": "clause", "offset": [179, 189]}, {"key": "data-centers", "type": "clause", "offset": [206, 218]}, {"key": "state-agencies", "type": "clause", "offset": [255, 269]}, {"key": "services-and", "type": "clause", "offset": [289, 301]}, {"key": "purchasing-power", "type": "definition", "offset": [358, 374]}, {"key": "computer-associates", "type": "definition", "offset": [390, 409]}, {"key": "state-and-local-government", "type": "definition", "offset": [440, 466]}, {"key": "discount-rate", "type": "definition", "offset": [494, 507]}, {"key": "the-work", "type": "definition", "offset": [509, 517]}, {"key": "type-of", "type": "definition", "offset": [627, 634]}, {"key": "software-solutions", "type": "clause", "offset": [758, 776]}, {"key": "information-on", "type": "clause", "offset": [945, 959]}, {"key": "oracle-software", "type": "definition", "offset": [1073, 1088]}, {"key": "cost-reduction", "type": "clause", "offset": [1143, 1157]}, {"key": "signed-by", "type": "clause", "offset": [1287, 1296]}, {"key": "review-unit", "type": "definition", "offset": [1394, 1405]}, {"key": "acquisition-planning", "type": "definition", "offset": [1489, 1509]}, {"key": "the-policy", "type": "clause", "offset": [1535, 1545]}, {"key": "asset-management-strategies", "type": "clause", "offset": [1575, 1602]}, {"key": "purchase-agreements", "type": "definition", "offset": [1660, 1679]}, {"key": "the-directors", "type": "clause", "offset": [1725, 1738]}, {"key": "cost-savings", "type": "definition", "offset": [1813, 1825]}, {"key": "entering-into", "type": "clause", "offset": [1855, 1868]}, {"key": "the-contract", "type": "definition", "offset": [1869, 1881]}, {"key": "de-facto", "type": "definition", "offset": [1895, 1903]}, {"key": "allocation-model", "type": "definition", "offset": [1923, 1939]}, {"key": "for-california", "type": "clause", "offset": [2043, 2057]}, {"key": "be-responsible", "type": "clause", "offset": [2116, 2130]}, {"key": "the-proposal", "type": "clause", "offset": [2153, 2165]}, {"key": "draft-contract", "type": "definition", "offset": [2240, 2254]}, {"key": "to-general", "type": "clause", "offset": [2255, 2265]}, {"key": "purchase-orders", "type": "clause", "offset": [2305, 2320]}, {"key": "oracle-database", "type": "clause", "offset": [2359, 2374]}, {"key": "and-maintenance", "type": "clause", "offset": [2384, 2399]}, {"key": "the-purchase", "type": "clause", "offset": [2476, 2488]}, {"key": "determine-whether", "type": "clause", "offset": [2500, 2517]}, {"key": "copies-of-the", "type": "clause", "offset": [2642, 2655]}, {"key": "fiscal-years", "type": "clause", "offset": [2778, 2790]}, {"key": "state-departments", "type": "definition", "offset": [2914, 2931]}, {"key": "agrees-to", "type": "clause", "offset": [2957, 2966]}, {"key": "take-the-lead", "type": "definition", "offset": [2967, 2980]}, {"key": "office-of-the-governor", "type": "definition", "offset": [3097, 3119]}, {"key": "future-obligations", "type": "clause", "offset": [3168, 3186]}, {"key": "financing-obligations", "type": "definition", "offset": [3312, 3333]}, {"key": "existing-commitments", "type": "definition", "offset": [3407, 3427]}, {"key": "the-proposed", "type": "clause", "offset": [3494, 3506]}, {"key": "source-contract", "type": "definition", "offset": [3567, 3582]}, {"key": "formal-proposal", "type": "definition", "offset": [3665, 3680]}, {"key": "review-and-comment", "type": "clause", "offset": [3751, 3769]}, {"key": "the-cost", "type": "clause", "offset": [3823, 3831]}, {"key": "to-validate", "type": "definition", "offset": [3914, 3925]}, {"key": "more-information", "type": "definition", "offset": [4018, 4034]}, {"key": "estimated-cost", "type": "definition", "offset": [4187, 4201]}, {"key": "draft-proposal", "type": "definition", "offset": [4284, 4298]}, {"key": "an-official", "type": "definition", "offset": [4415, 4426]}, {"key": "purchase-of", "type": "clause", "offset": [4636, 4647]}, {"key": "to-provide", "type": "definition", "offset": [4673, 4683]}, {"key": "for-the-state", "type": "definition", "offset": [4707, 4720]}, {"key": "relates-to", "type": "definition", "offset": [4755, 4765]}, {"key": "laid-out", "type": "definition", "offset": [4789, 4797]}, {"key": "best-practices", "type": "clause", "offset": [4840, 4854]}, {"key": "maximum-benefit", "type": "clause", "offset": [4925, 4940]}, {"key": "power-of", "type": "clause", "offset": [5084, 5092]}, {"key": "after-receiving", "type": "clause", "offset": [5104, 5119]}, {"key": "the-director-of-finance", "type": "definition", "offset": [5168, 5191]}, {"key": "a-fixed", "type": "clause", "offset": [5500, 5507]}, {"key": "contract-for", "type": "definition", "offset": [5514, 5526]}, {"key": "payments-over", "type": "clause", "offset": [5559, 5572]}, {"key": "no-assurance", "type": "clause", "offset": [5598, 5610]}, {"key": "benefits-will", "type": "clause", "offset": [5615, 5628]}, {"key": "this-contract", "type": "clause", "offset": [5717, 5730]}, {"key": "contracts-with", "type": "clause", "offset": [5753, 5767]}, {"key": "within-the-state", "type": "clause", "offset": [5862, 5878]}, {"key": "sufficient-information", "type": "definition", "offset": [5917, 5939]}, {"key": "presented-to", "type": "definition", "offset": [5953, 5965]}, {"key": "to-enter", "type": "definition", "offset": [6034, 6042]}, {"key": "policy-basis", "type": "clause", "offset": [6080, 6092]}, {"key": "the-understanding", "type": "clause", "offset": [6098, 6115]}, {"key": "database-software", "type": "clause", "offset": [6383, 6400]}, {"key": "cost-of", "type": "definition", "offset": [6486, 6493]}, {"key": "an-additional", "type": "clause", "offset": [6548, 6561]}, {"key": "per-year", "type": "definition", "offset": [6602, 6610]}, {"key": "side-agreements", "type": "definition", "offset": [6646, 6661]}, {"key": "related-to", "type": "clause", "offset": [6662, 6672]}, {"key": "support-services", "type": "definition", "offset": [6731, 6747]}, {"key": "the-preferred", "type": "clause", "offset": [6781, 6794]}, {"key": "leasing-agent", "type": "definition", "offset": [6795, 6808]}, {"key": "see-appendix-c", "type": "clause", "offset": [6811, 6825]}, {"key": "management-policy", "type": "clause", "offset": [6882, 6899]}, {"key": "six-months", "type": "definition", "offset": [6940, 6950]}, {"key": "report-the-results", "type": "clause", "offset": [6997, 7015]}, {"key": "the-legislature", "type": "clause", "offset": [7065, 7080]}, {"key": "by-general", "type": "clause", "offset": [7127, 7137]}, {"key": "meet-to-discuss", "type": "clause", "offset": [7200, 7215]}, {"key": "how-to-proceed", "type": "clause", "offset": [7216, 7230]}], "hash": "902d454c5a19a5d67d5e8bce259c791b", "id": 7}, {"samples": [{"hash": "k21WPYd4Qiw", "uri": "/contracts/k21WPYd4Qiw#december-2000", "label": "Collective Agreement", "score": 21.0, "published": true}], "size": 1, "snippet": "Article 1 - Scope", "snippet_links": [{"key": "article-1", "type": "definition", "offset": [0, 9]}], "hash": "beba20c173f99ac5535460952dfe887b", "id": 8}, {"samples": [{"hash": "dEmsOTsvfXJ", "uri": "/contracts/dEmsOTsvfXJ#december-2000", "label": "Loan Agreement (Chartered Semiconductor Manufacturing LTD)", "score": 18.0, "published": true}], "size": 1, "snippet": "Upon advance of a Drawing under Clause 5, the Company shall apply all the proceeds thereof for the purposes described in Clause 4.1 above and for no other purpose whatsoever.", "snippet_links": [{"key": "a-drawing", "type": "definition", "offset": [16, 25]}, {"key": "clause-5", "type": "clause", "offset": [32, 40]}, {"key": "the-company-shall", "type": "clause", "offset": [42, 59]}, {"key": "for-the-purposes", "type": "clause", "offset": [91, 107]}, {"key": "in-clause", "type": "clause", "offset": [118, 127]}, {"key": "no-other-purpose", "type": "clause", "offset": [146, 162]}], "hash": "431c47cad064cca221ec0544d0b89d30", "id": 9}, {"samples": [{"hash": "7ktgLSM88IV", "uri": "/contracts/7ktgLSM88IV#december-2000", "label": "Research and Licence Agreement (Chemgenex Pharmaceuticals LTD)", "score": 17.0, "published": true}], "size": 1, "snippet": "In vivo functional studies with best performing antisense oligos - monitor changes in [*] levels. Complete in vitro studies with [*]. Construct recombinant [*] Adenovirus and prepare viral stocks. Adenoviral mediated expression of [*] - in vitro functional studies in cell culture. In vivo functional studies - IP and IM delivery of Adenoviral [*]. Continue with in vivo functional studies. If a physiological relationship between changes in [*] and [*] levels to the diabetic or obese state of the animals is once established, methods to modulate endogenous levels of [*] activity will be investigated. [*] - Research Proposal Increased expression of [*] in hypothalamus is found to be associated with increased food intake and increase in body weight.", "snippet_links": [{"key": "in-vivo", "type": "definition", "offset": [0, 7]}, {"key": "changes-in", "type": "clause", "offset": [75, 85]}, {"key": "in-vitro", "type": "definition", "offset": [107, 115]}, {"key": "delivery-of", "type": "clause", "offset": [321, 332]}, {"key": "relationship-between", "type": "clause", "offset": [410, 430]}, {"key": "state-of", "type": "definition", "offset": [486, 494]}, {"key": "research-proposal", "type": "definition", "offset": [610, 627]}, {"key": "associated-with", "type": "definition", "offset": [687, 702]}, {"key": "body-weight", "type": "definition", "offset": [741, 752]}], "hash": "cef4157e4bc0aa35b26f9ad732ba7b46", "id": 10}], "next_curs": "ClYSUGoVc35sYXdpbnNpZGVyY29udHJhY3RzcjILEhZDbGF1c2VTbmlwcGV0R3JvdXBfdjU2IhZkZWNlbWJlci0yMDAwIzAwMDAwMDBhDKIBAmVuGAAgAA==", "clause": {"parents": [], "title": "December 2000", "size": 11, "children": [], "id": "december-2000", "related": [["december-2020", "December 2020", "December 2020"], ["december", "December", "December"], ["november", "November", "November"], ["february", "February", "February"], ["april", "April", "April"]], "related_snippets": [], "updated": "2025-07-07T12:37:53+00:00", "also_ask": [], "drafting_tip": null, "explanation": ""}, "json": true, "cursor": ""}}