DESIGN REVIEW BY OWNER Sample Clauses

DESIGN REVIEW BY OWNER. 2.1 Owner and Contractor agree to participate in an accelerated Design Review prior to contract Effective Date. Owner and Contractor agree to accelerated resolution of Design Review comments. *** CONFIDENTIAL MATERIAL REDACTED AND SEPARATELY FILED WITH THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION. 2.2 The purpose of the Design Review is to afford Owner the opportunity to ensure that Contractor's design and final selection of Equipment is in accordance with this Agreement. 2.3 The Design Review will consist of Owner review of the permit documents Contractor has submitted to Xxxx and Los Angeles counties for approval. 2.4 Design Review shall not commence without Owner or Owner's representative. 2.5 The Design Review shall be held at Contractor facilities in Richmond, California. 2.6 All Design Review participants shall pay their own travel, lodging and other expenses. 2.7 Contractor and Owner shall provide access to all relevant technical subject matter experts during the Design Review. 2.8 Design Review Documents will consist of the permitting and supporting documents, which include but are not limited to: 2.8.1 Array layout with major equipment locations 2.8.1.1 Control Point Schedule with equipment names and locations for PCS stations, motors and controllers, and MDAS tower locations in solar fields.
Sample 1
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
DESIGN REVIEW BY OWNER. Contractor shall provide to Owner any and all information upon which the design is based, including, but not limited to the results of survey, geotechnical and materials investigations, shop drawings, design drawings and manufacturers’ data. Engineering calculations are available for review by the Owner in the Contractor’s engineering design office. Contractor and Subcontractor generated drawings and documents shall be issued to Owner for review. The final level of drawing and document review, including quantity required, shall be determined at the project kickoff meeting. Electronic AutoCAD files of drawings and other documents shall be submitted in addition to the hard copies as a part of the same transmittal and provided on Compact Disc (CD) or other electronic device as may be directed by the Owner. These electronic drawings will be checked by Owner for compliance to documentation requirements. Except where expressly agreed otherwise by Owner, the following will apply to document submittals by Contractor or Subcontractors: Drawings: At least one copy in “B” size (11” x 17” format) shall be submitted in electronic form (“PDF” or comparable for design and construction drawings only). Final drawings shall be AutoCAD and must not be a newer version than that which is currently being used by El Paso Electric Co. Documents: Letter size hardcopies and one electronic copy shall be provided for written text such as letters, specifications, procedures design criteria, manuals, lists, etc. in Microsoft Word and / or Excel format. Drawings and Documents: Contractor shall make reasonable efforts to secure electronically formatted drawings and documents from all Subcontractors. When electronic formatting as noted in “a” and “b” above is not obtainable due to supplier policies or procedures then Contractor shall have such materials converted and submitted in “.tif “ or “.pdf” format. Instruction, Operation, Equipment and all other Manuals: PDF manuals and other multi‑page documents shall include a table of contents or index. It is recommended that all chapters or tabs be bookmarked. Once the files or documents are placed on a Compact Disc (CD) they should be organized in the order of the hard copy binder or as one PDF. Subcontractor drawings and documentation shall also be submitted in hardcopy and electronic format to Owner as described above. Owner may make comments directed to Contractor on Subcontractor drawings and documents if items are found not to be in compl...
Sample 1
DESIGN REVIEW BY OWNER. 2.1 Owner and Contractor agree to participate in an accelerated Design Review prior to contract Effective Date. Owner and Contractor agree to accelerated resolution of Design Review comments. 2.2 The purpose of the Design Review is to afford Owner the opportunity to ensure that Contractor's design and final selection of Equipment is in accordance with this Agreement. 2.3 The Design Review will consist of Owner review of the permit documents Contractor has submitted to Xxxx and Los Angeles counties for approval. 2.4 Design Review shall not commence without Owner or Owner's representative. 2.5 The Design Review shall be held at Contractor facilities in Richmond, California. 2.6 All Design Review participants shall pay their own travel, lodging and other expenses. 2.7 Contractor and Owner shall provide access to all relevant technical subject matter experts during the Design Review. 2.8 Design Review Documents will consist of the permitting and supporting documents, which include but are not limited to: 2.8.1 Array layout with major equipment locations 2.8.1.1 Control Point Schedule with equipment names and locations for PCS stations, motors and controllers, and MDAS tower locations in solar fields.
Sample 1
DESIGN REVIEW BY OWNER. 2.1 Owner and Contractor agree to participate in an accelerated Design Review prior to contract Effective Date. Owner and Contractor agree to accelerated resolution of Design Review comments. 2.2 The purpose of the Design Review is to afford Owner the opportunity to ensure that Contractor's design and final selection of Equipment is in accordance with this Agreement. 2.3 The Design Review will consist of Owner review of the permit documents Contractor has submitted to Xxxx and Los Angeles counties for approval.
Sample 1

Related to DESIGN REVIEW BY OWNER

  • Design Review ‌ (a) Where so specified in Schedule A (Scope of Goods and Services) or as otherwise instructed by the City, the Supplier shall submit design-related Documentation for review by the City, and shall not proceed with work on the basis of such design Documentation until the City’s approval of such Documentation has been received in writing. (b) None of: (i) the submission of Documentation to the City by the Supplier; (ii) its examination by or on behalf of the City; or (iii) the making of any comment thereon (including any approval thereof) shall in any way relieve the Supplier of any of its obligations under this Agreement or of its duty to take reasonable steps to ensure the accuracy and correctness of such Documentation, and its suitability to the matter to which it relates.

  • Project Review A. Programmatic Allowances 1. If FEMA determines that the entire scope of an Undertaking conforms to one or more allowances in Appendix B of this Agreement, with determinations for Tier II Allowances being made by SOI-qualified staff, FEMA shall complete the Section 106 review process by documenting this determination in the project file, without SHPO review or notification. 2. If the Undertaking involves a National Historic Landmark (NHL), FEMA shall notify the SHPO, participating Tribe(s), and the NPS NHL Program Manager of the NPS Midwest Regional Office that the Undertaking conforms to one or more allowances. FEMA shall provide information about the proposed scope of work for the Undertaking and the allowance(s) enabling FEMA’s determination. 3. If FEMA determines any portion of an Undertaking’s scope of work does not conform to one or more allowances listed in Appendix B, FEMA shall conduct expedited or standard Section 106 review, as appropriate, for the entire Undertaking in accordance with Stipulation II.B, Expedited Review for Emergency Undertakings, or Stipulation II.C, Standard Project Review. 4. Allowances may be revised and new allowances may be added to this Agreement in accordance with Stipulation IV.A.3, Amendments. B. Expedited Review for Emergency Undertakings

  • Project Completion Report At the completion of construction and once a Project is placed in service, the Subrecipient must submit a Project Completion Report that includes the total number of units built and leased, affordable units built and leased, DR-MHP units built and leased, an accomplishment narrative, and the tenants names, demographics and income for each DR-MHP unit.

  • REVIEW OF WORK The Consultant shall permit the City, its agents and/or employees to review, at any time, all work performed pursuant to the terms of this Agreement at any stage of the work;

  • Acceptance Testing At the time of installation of a LIS trunk group, and at no additional charge, acceptance tests will be performed to ensure that the service is operational and meets the applicable technical parameters.

  • Acceptance Tests 11.1 If the Contract provides acceptance tests for Goods and/or the result of Services after their completion and/or delivery to the Purchaser, the acceptance shall only be considered as definitive when such tests have demonstrated the compliance of the Goods and/or the result of the Services to the requirements in the Contract. 11.2 Where the Contract provides for an acceptance procedure in the presence of both parties, at the successful completion of such procedure, the Purchaser shall issue the Supplier with an acceptance certificate which shall authorise the Supplier to invoice the Purchaser for any payment due on such acceptance. 11.3 The Purchaser shall at its discretion be entitled to issue and acceptancecertificate with reserves. The Supplier shall be obliged to remedy any non-conformities within the period set out in the acceptance certificate. Any payment which would otherwise have been due on acceptance may be withheld by the Purchaser in whole or part until the non- conformities underlying the reserves have been remedied.

  • Review Scope The parties confirm that the Asset Representations Review is not responsible for (a) reviewing the Receivables for compliance with the representations and warranties under the Transaction Documents, except as described in this Agreement or (b) determining whether noncompliance with the representations and warranties constitutes a breach of the Eligibility Representations. For the avoidance of doubt, the parties confirm that the review is not designed to determine why an Obligor is delinquent or the creditworthiness of the Obligor, either at the time of any Asset Review or at the time of origination of the related Receivable. Further, the Asset Review is not designed to establish cause, materiality or recourse for any Test Fail (as defined in Section 3.05).

  • Statement of Work The Statement of Work to which Grantee is bound is incorporated into and made a part of this Grant Agreement for all purposes and included as Attachment A.

  • Commissioning Commissioning tests of the Interconnection Customer’s installed equipment shall be performed pursuant to applicable codes and standards. The ISO and Connecting Transmission Owner must be given at least five Business Days written notice, or as otherwise mutually agreed to by the Parties, of the tests and may be present to witness the commissioning tests.

  • Scope of Work For the 2022/2023 Grant Period, the Provider will maintain a victim services program that will be available to provide direct services to victims of crime who are identified by the Provider or are presented to the Provider, as specified in the Provider’s 2022/2023 Grant Application as approved by the OAG and incorporated herein by reference.

Draft better contracts in just 5 minutes Get the weekly Law Insider newsletter packed with expert videos, webinars, ebooks, and more!