Common use of FINDINGS AND ORDERING PARAGRAPHS Clause in Contracts

FINDINGS AND ORDERING PARAGRAPHS. The Commission, having considered the entire record herein, is of the opinion and finds that: (1) Odin and US Cellular are telecommunications carriers as defined in Section 13-202 of the Act, which provide telecommunications services as defined in Section 13-203 of the Act; (2) the Commission has jurisdiction over the parties hereto and the subject matter hereof; (3) the facts recited and conclusions reached in the prefatory portion of this Order are supported by the record and are hereby adopted as findings of fact and law; (4) the Agreement does not discriminate against a telecommunications carrier not a party to the Agreement and is not contrary to the public interest, convenience, and necessity; (5) in order to assure that the implementation of the Agreement is in the public interest, Xxxx should implement the Agreement by filing a verified statement with the Chief Clerk of the Commission, within five days of approval by the Commission, that the approved Agreement is the same as the Agreement filed in this docket with the verified joint petition; the Chief Clerk should place the Agreement on the Commission’s web site under “Interconnection Agreements;” (6) within five days of the entry of this Order, Xxxx should modify its tariffs to reference the Agreement in the manner recommended by Staff and described in the prefatory portion of this Order above; (7) the Agreement should be approved as hereinafter set forth; and (8) approval of this Agreement does not have any precedential affect on any future negotiated agreements or Commission orders.

Appears in 1 contract

Samples: Traffic Termination Agreement

AutoNDA by SimpleDocs

FINDINGS AND ORDERING PARAGRAPHS. The Commission, having considered the entire record herein, is of the opinion and finds that: (1) Odin Frontier and US Cellular are telecommunications carriers as defined in Section 13-202 of the Act, which provide telecommunications services as defined in Section 13-203 of the Act; (2) the Commission has jurisdiction over the parties hereto and the subject matter hereof; (3) the facts recited and conclusions reached in the prefatory portion of this Order are supported by the record and are hereby adopted as findings of fact and law; (4) the Agreement does not discriminate against a telecommunications carrier not a party to the Agreement and is not contrary to the public interest, convenience, and necessity; (5) in order to assure that the implementation of the Agreement is in the public interest, Xxxx Frontier should implement the Agreement by filing a verified statement with the Chief Clerk of the Commission, within five days of approval by the Commission, that the approved Agreement is the same as the Agreement filed in this docket with the verified joint petition; the Chief Clerk should place the Agreement on the Commission’s web site under “Interconnection Agreements;” (6) within five days of the entry of this Order, Xxxx Frontier should modify its tariffs to reference the Agreement in the manner recommended by Staff and described in the prefatory portion of this Order above; (7) the Agreement should be approved as hereinafter set forth; and (8) approval of this Agreement does not have any precedential affect on any future negotiated agreements or Commission orders.

Appears in 1 contract

Samples: Interconnection Agreement

FINDINGS AND ORDERING PARAGRAPHS. The Commission, having considered the entire record herein, is of the opinion and finds that: (1) Odin Ameritech and US Cellular Premiere are telecommunications carriers as defined in Section 13-202 of the Public Utilities Act, (220 ILCS 5/1-101 et seq.) which provide telecommunications services as defined in Section 13-203 of the Public Utilities Act; (2) the Commission has jurisdiction over of the parties hereto and the subject matter hereof; (3) the facts recited and conclusions reached in the prefatory portion of this Order are supported by the record and are hereby adopted as findings of fact and law; (4) the Agreement does not discriminate against a telecommunications carrier not a party to the Agreement and is not contrary to the public interest, convenience, convenience and necessity; (5) in order to assure that the implementation of the Agreement is in the public interest, Xxxx Ameritech should implement the Agreement by filing a verified statement with the Chief Clerk of the Commission, within five (5) days of approval by the Commission, that the approved Agreement is the same as the Agreement that was filed in this docket with the verified joint petition; the Chief Clerk should place the Agreement on the Commission’s 's web site under Interconnection Agreements; (6) within five (5) days of the entry of this Order, Xxxx Ameritech should modify its tariffs to reference the negotiated Agreement in the manner recommended by Staff and described in the prefatory portion of this Order above; (7) the Agreement should be approved as hereinafter set forth; and; (8) approval of this Agreement does not have any precedential affect on any future negotiated agreements or Commission ordersOrders.

Appears in 1 contract

Samples: Interconnection Agreement

FINDINGS AND ORDERING PARAGRAPHS. The Commission, having considered reviewed the entire record hereinand being fully advised in the premises, is of the opinion and finds that: (1) Odin Illinois Bell Telephone Company (SBC Illinois) and US Cellular Arch Wireless Operating Company, Inc. are telecommunications carriers as defined in Section 13-202 of the Act, which provide telecommunications services as defined in Section 13-203 of the Public Utilities Act; (2) the Commission has jurisdiction over the parties hereto and the subject matter hereof; (3) the facts recited recitals of fact and conclusions reached in the prefatory portion of this Order are supported by the record and are hereby adopted as findings of fact and lawfact; (4) SBC and Arch Wireless have entered into a Paging Wireless Interconnection Agreement dated January 15, 2003, which has been submitted to the Commission for approval under Section 252(e) of the Telecommunications Act of 1996; (5) the Agreement between SBC and Arch Wireless does not discriminate against a telecommunications carrier not a party to the Agreement and is not contrary to the public interest, convenience, and necessityAgreement; (56) in order to assure that the implementation of the Agreement is in the public interest, Xxxx SBC should implement the Agreement by filing a verified statement with the Chief Clerk of the Commission, within five (5) days of approval by the Commission, that the approved Agreement is the same as the Agreement filed in this docket with the verified joint petition; the . The Chief Clerk should shall place the Agreement on the Commission’s web site website under Interconnection Agreements;” (6) within five days of the entry of this Order, Xxxx should modify its tariffs to reference the Agreement in the manner recommended by Staff and described in the prefatory portion of this Order above; (7) SBC should also place replacement sheets in its tariffs, located at Ill.C.C. No. 21 Section 19.15; (8) the Agreement should be approved as hereinafter set forth; and; (8) 9) approval of this the Agreement does not have any precedential affect effect on any future negotiated agreements or Commission ordersOrders.

Appears in 1 contract

Samples: Paging Wireless Interconnection Agreement

FINDINGS AND ORDERING PARAGRAPHS. The Commission, having considered the entire record herein, is of the opinion and finds that: (1) Odin El Paso and US Cellular are telecommunications carriers as defined in Section 13-202 of the Act, which provide telecommunications services as defined in Section 13-203 of the Act; (2) the Commission has jurisdiction over the parties hereto and the subject matter hereof; (3) the facts recited and conclusions reached in the prefatory portion of this Order are supported by the record and are hereby adopted as findings of fact and law; (4) the Agreement does not discriminate against a telecommunications carrier not a party to the Agreement and is not contrary to the public interest, convenience, and necessity; (5) in order to assure that the implementation of the Agreement is in the public interest, Xxxx El Paso should implement the Agreement by filing a verified statement with the Chief Clerk of the Commission, within five days of approval by the Commission, that the approved Agreement is the same as the Agreement filed in this docket with the verified joint petition; the Chief Clerk should place the Agreement on the Commission’s web site under “Interconnection Agreements;” (6) within five days of the entry of this Order, Xxxx El Paso should modify its tariffs to reference the Agreement in the manner recommended by Staff and described in the prefatory portion of this Order above; (7) the Agreement should be approved as hereinafter set forth; and (8) approval of this Agreement does not have any precedential affect on any future negotiated agreements or Commission orders.

Appears in 1 contract

Samples: Traffic Termination Agreement

FINDINGS AND ORDERING PARAGRAPHS. The Commission, having considered the entire record hereinherein and being fully advised in the premises, is of the opinion and finds that: (1) Odin IBTC and US Cellular Onvoy LLC are telecommunications carriers as defined in Section 13-13- 202 of the Act, which provide telecommunications services as defined in Section 13-203 of the Public Utilities Act; (2) IBTC and Onvoy LLC have entered into an Interconnection Agreement on August 22, 2014, which has been submitted to the Commission for approval under Section 252(e) of the Telecommunications Act of 1996; (3) the Commission has jurisdiction over of the parties hereto and the subject matter hereof; (34) the facts recited recitals of fact and conclusions reached in the prefatory portion of this Order are supported by the record and are hereby adopted as findings of fact and lawfact; (45) the Agreement between IBTC and Onvoy LLC does not discriminate against a telecommunications carrier not a party to the Agreement and is not contrary to the public interest, convenience, and necessityAgreement; (56) in order to assure that the implementation of the Agreement is in the public interest, Xxxx IBTC should implement the Agreement by filing a verified statement with the Chief Clerk of the Commission, within five (5) days of approval by the Commission, that the approved Agreement is the same as the Agreement filed in this docket with the verified joint petition; , as amended by the Joint Petitioners’ stipulation. The Chief Clerk should shall place the Agreement on the Commission’s web site website under Interconnection Agreements;” (6) within five days of the entry of this Order, Xxxx should modify its tariffs to reference the Agreement in the manner recommended by Staff and described in the prefatory portion of this Order above; (7) Citizens should also place replacement sheets in its tariffs at the following location: Ill.C.C. No. 16 Section 18; (8) the Agreement should be approved as hereinafter set forth; and; (8) 9) approval of this the Agreement does not have any precedential affect effect on any future negotiated agreements or Commission ordersOrders.

Appears in 1 contract

Samples: Interconnection Agreement

FINDINGS AND ORDERING PARAGRAPHS. The Commission, having considered the entire record herein, is of the opinion and finds that: (1) Odin SBC and US Cellular CityNet are telecommunications carriers as defined in Section 13-202 of the Act, which provide telecommunications services as defined in Section 13-203 of the Act; (2) the Commission has jurisdiction over the parties hereto and the subject matter hereof; (3) the facts recited and conclusions reached in the prefatory portion of this Order are supported by the record and are hereby adopted as findings of fact and law; (4) the Agreement does not discriminate against a telecommunications carrier not a party to the Agreement and is not contrary to the public interest, convenience, and necessity; (5) in order to assure that the implementation of the Agreement is in the public interest, Xxxx SBC should implement the Agreement by filing a verified statement with the Chief Clerk of the Commission, within five days of approval by the Commission, that the approved Agreement is the same as the Agreement filed in this docket with the verified joint petition; the Chief Clerk should place the Agreement on the Commission’s web site under “Interconnection Agreements;” (6) within five days of the entry of this Order, Xxxx SBC should modify its tariffs to reference the Agreement in the manner recommended by Staff and described in the prefatory portion of this Order above; (7) the Agreement should be approved as hereinafter set forth; and (8) approval of this Agreement does not have any precedential affect on any future negotiated agreements or Commission orders.

Appears in 1 contract

Samples: Interconnection Agreement

AutoNDA by SimpleDocs

FINDINGS AND ORDERING PARAGRAPHS. The Commission, having considered the entire record herein, is of the opinion and finds that: (1) Odin Xxxxx and US Cellular are telecommunications carriers as defined in Section 13-202 of the Act, which provide telecommunications services as defined in Section 13-203 of the Act; (2) the Commission has jurisdiction over the parties hereto and the subject matter hereof; (3) the facts recited and conclusions reached in the prefatory portion of this Order are supported by the record and are hereby adopted as findings of fact and law; (4) the Agreement does not discriminate against a telecommunications carrier not a party to the Agreement and is not contrary to the public interest, convenience, and necessity; (5) in order to assure that the implementation of the Agreement is in the public interest, Xxxx Xxxxx should implement the Agreement by filing a verified statement with the Chief Clerk of the Commission, within five days of approval by the Commission, that the approved Agreement is the same as the Agreement filed in this docket with the verified joint petition; the Chief Clerk should place the Agreement on the Commission’s web site under “Interconnection Agreements;” (6) within five days of the entry of this Order, Xxxx Xxxxx should modify its tariffs to reference the Agreement in the manner recommended by Staff and described in the prefatory portion of this Order above; (7) the Agreement should be approved as hereinafter set forth; and (8) approval of this Agreement does not have any precedential affect on any future negotiated agreements or Commission orders.

Appears in 1 contract

Samples: Traffic Termination Agreement

FINDINGS AND ORDERING PARAGRAPHS. The Commission, having considered the entire record hereinherein and being fully advised in the premises, is of the opinion and finds that: (1) Odin Illinois’ and US Cellular Sonic are telecommunications carriers as defined in Section 13-202 of the Act, which provide telecommunications services as defined in Section 13-203 of the Public Utilities Act; (2) Illinois’ and Sonic have entered into an Interconnection Agreement dated as of August 15, 2011, which has been submitted to the Commission for approval under Section 252(e) of the Telecommunications Act of 1996; (3) the Commission has jurisdiction over of the parties hereto and the subject matter hereof; (34) the facts recited recitals of fact and conclusions reached in the prefatory portion of this Order are supported by the record and are hereby adopted as findings of fact and lawfact; (45) the Agreement between Illinois Bell and Xxxxx does not discriminate against a telecommunications carrier not a party to the Agreement and is not contrary to the public interest, convenience, and necessityAgreement; (56) in order to assure that the implementation of the Agreement is in the public interest, Xxxx should Illinois Bellshould implement the Agreement by filing a verified statement with the Chief Clerk of the Commission, within five (5) days of approval by the Commission, that the approved Agreement is the same as the Agreement filed in this docket with the verified joint petition; , as amended by the Joint Petitioners’ stipulation. The Chief Clerk should shall place the Agreement on the Commission’s web site website under Interconnection Agreements;” (6) within five days of the entry of this Order, Xxxx should modify its tariffs to reference the Agreement in the manner recommended by Staff and described in the prefatory portion of this Order above; (7) Illinois Bell should also place replacement sheets in its tariffs at the following location: Ill.C.C. No. 16 Section 18; (8) the Agreement should be approved as hereinafter set forth; and; (8) 9) approval of this the Agreement does not have any precedential affect effect on any future negotiated agreements or Commission ordersOrders.

Appears in 1 contract

Samples: Interconnection Agreement

FINDINGS AND ORDERING PARAGRAPHS. The Commission, having considered the entire record herein, is of the opinion and finds that: (1) Odin C-R and US Cellular are telecommunications carriers as defined in Section 13-202 of the Act, which provide telecommunications services as defined in Section 13-203 of the Act; (2) the Commission has jurisdiction over the parties hereto and the subject matter hereof; (3) the facts recited and conclusions reached in the prefatory portion of this Order are supported by the record and are hereby adopted as findings of fact and law; (4) the Agreement does not discriminate against a telecommunications carrier not a party to the Agreement and is not contrary to the public interest, convenience, and necessity; (5) in order to assure that the implementation of the Agreement is in the public interest, Xxxx C-R should implement the Agreement by filing a verified statement with the Chief Clerk of the Commission, within five days of approval by the Commission, that the approved Agreement is the same as the Agreement filed in this docket with the verified joint petition; the Chief Clerk should place the Agreement on the Commission’s web site under “Interconnection Agreements;” (6) within five days of the entry of this Order, Xxxx C-R should modify its tariffs to reference the Agreement in the manner recommended by Staff and described in the prefatory portion of this Order above; (7) the Agreement should be approved as hereinafter set forth; and (8) approval of this Agreement does not have any precedential affect on any future negotiated agreements or Commission orders.

Appears in 1 contract

Samples: Traffic Termination Agreement

FINDINGS AND ORDERING PARAGRAPHS. The Commission, having considered the entire record herein, is of the opinion and finds that: (1) Odin Ameritech and US Cellular Bullseye are telecommunications carriers as defined in Section 13-202 of the Public Utilities Act, (220 ILCS 5/1-101 et seq.) which provide telecommunications services as defined in Section 13-203 of the Public Utilities Act; (2) the Commission has jurisdiction over of the parties hereto and the subject matter hereof; (3) the facts recited and conclusions reached in the prefatory portion of this Order are supported by the record and are hereby adopted as findings of fact and law; (4) the Agreement does not discriminate against a telecommunications carrier not a party to the Agreement and is not contrary to the public interest, convenience, convenience and necessity; (5) in order to assure that the implementation of the Agreement is in the public interest, Xxxx Ameritech should implement the Agreement by filing a verified statement with the Chief Clerk of the Commission, within five ten (10) days of approval by the Commission, that the approved Agreement is the same as the Agreement that was filed in this docket with the verified joint petition; the Chief Clerk should place the Agreement on the Commission’s 's web site under Interconnection Agreements; (6) within five ten (10) days of the entry of this Order, Xxxx Ameritech should modify its tariffs to reference the negotiated Agreement in the manner recommended by Staff and described in the prefatory portion of this Order above; (7) the Agreement should be approved as hereinafter set forth; and; (8) approval of this Agreement does not have any precedential affect on any future negotiated agreements or Commission ordersOrders.

Appears in 1 contract

Samples: Interconnection Agreement

Draft better contracts in just 5 minutes Get the weekly Law Insider newsletter packed with expert videos, webinars, ebooks, and more!