{"component": "clause", "props": {"groups": [{"snippet": "A Practical Guide Through Qualitative Analysis, London: Sage. \u2587\u2587\u2587\u2587\u2587\u2587, \u2587., 2012. Memory Contested, Locality Transformed. Representing Japanese Colonial \u2018Heritage\u2019 in Taiwan. Archaeological Studies Leiden University 26, Leiden: Leiden University Press. \u2587\u2587\u2587\u2587\u2587, \u2587., 2005. The bigger picture. Archaeology and values in long term cultural resource management. In", "snippet_links": [{"key": "qualitative-analysis", "type": "clause", "offset": [26, 46]}, {"key": "long-term", "type": "clause", "offset": [314, 323]}, {"key": "cultural-resource-management", "type": "clause", "offset": [324, 352]}], "samples": [{"hash": "47wURzBt14h", "uri": "/contracts/47wURzBt14h#grounded-theory", "label": "Not Applicable", "score": 21.9414263739, "published": true}, {"hash": "83o3CoXujoX", "uri": "/contracts/83o3CoXujoX#grounded-theory", "label": "N/A", "score": 20.5181382615, "published": true}], "size": 2, "hash": "957f0d050d02bb5525498f294d51053d", "id": 3}, {"snippet": "The Internet can provide a platform for female actors to construct a less restricted female identity than would otherwise be possible within the Salafi-jihadist movement.", "snippet_links": [{"key": "the-internet", "type": "clause", "offset": [0, 12]}, {"key": "provide-a", "type": "definition", "offset": [17, 26]}, {"key": "to-construct", "type": "clause", "offset": [54, 66]}], "samples": [{"hash": "7lRl4Gmpshh", "uri": "/contracts/7lRl4Gmpshh#grounded-theory", "label": "Online Radicalisation: The Use of the Internet by Islamic State Terrorists in the Us (2012 2018)", "score": 30.8567503895, "published": true}, {"hash": "bG4zbwwKqc1", "uri": "/contracts/bG4zbwwKqc1#grounded-theory", "label": "Online Radicalisation: The Use of the Internet by Islamic State Terrorists in the Us (2012 2018)", "score": 25.0219028063, "published": true}], "size": 2, "hash": "85d68d5bae95c648b616c2e7b4e72934", "id": 1}, {"snippet": "In \u2587. \u2587\u2587\u2587\u2587\u2587\u2587 & \u2587. \u2587\u2587\u2587\u2587\u2587\u2587\u2587 (Eds.), Sage Handbook of Grounded Theory (pp. 191-213). London: Sage. \u2587\u2587\u2587\u2587\u2587, \u2587. (2006) Jihad: The Trail of Political Islam. London: I.B. Tauris & Co. \u2587\u2587\u2587\u2587, \u2587.\u2587. (2005). Hospitality in Islam. Hiba Magazine, 2(3).", "snippet_links": [{"key": "in-\u2587", "type": "clause", "offset": [0, 4]}], "samples": [{"hash": "9LdyDchMj7D", "uri": "/contracts/9LdyDchMj7D#grounded-theory", "label": "Doctoral Thesis", "score": 26.1416989993, "published": true}, {"hash": "1HhMoh7jhkk", "uri": "/contracts/1HhMoh7jhkk#grounded-theory", "label": "Doctoral Thesis", "score": 26.1023823796, "published": true}], "size": 2, "hash": "70d5f374e840fdfba31210a68116960c", "id": 2}, {"snippet": "To do this, I will draw from a methodology inspired by Grounded Theory (GTM), which seeks to approach data with an open mind rather than testing the hypotheses of previous scholars.) GTM is an inductive method of inquiry, dating back to \u2587\u2587\u2587\u2587\u2587\u2587 and \u2587\u2587\u2587\u2587\u2587\u2587\u2587\u2019 The Discovery of", "snippet_links": [{"key": "an-open", "type": "clause", "offset": [112, 119]}, {"key": "method-of", "type": "definition", "offset": [203, 212]}, {"key": "discovery-of", "type": "clause", "offset": [261, 273]}], "samples": [{"hash": "7lRl4Gmpshh", "uri": "/contracts/7lRl4Gmpshh#grounded-theory", "label": "Online Radicalisation: The Use of the Internet by Islamic State Terrorists in the Us (2012 2018)", "score": 30.8567503895, "published": true}, {"hash": "bG4zbwwKqc1", "uri": "/contracts/bG4zbwwKqc1#grounded-theory", "label": "Online Radicalisation: The Use of the Internet by Islamic State Terrorists in the Us (2012 2018)", "score": 25.0219028063, "published": true}], "size": 2, "hash": "3a257753054070376b1037402e8625d5", "id": 4}, {"snippet": "New Brunswick: AldineTransaction. \u2587\u2587\u2587\u2587\u2587, \u2587. (2011). Behind Bars, the definitive guide to music notation. London: Faber Music. \u2587\u2587\u2587\u2587\u2587\u2587\u2587\u2587\u2587, \u2587. (2002). The lute and the polyphonist. Studi Musicali(31), 89-108. \u2587\u2587\u2587\u2587\u2587\u2587\u2587\u2587\u2587, \u2587. (2010). \u2587\u2587\u2587\u2587 \u2587\u2587\u2587\u2587\u2587\u2587\u2587, self-instruction, and the amateur instrumentalist. In R. E. \u2587\u2587\u2587\u2587\u2587\u2587, \u2587. \u2587\u2587\u2587\u2587\u2587\u2587\u2587\u2587 \u2587\u2587\u2587\u2587\u2587, & \u2587. \u2587. \u2587\u2587\u2587\u2587\u2587 (Eds.), Music eduction in the Middle Ages and the Renaissance (pp. 126-137). Bloomington: Indiana University Press.", "snippet_links": [{"key": "new-brunswick", "type": "clause", "offset": [0, 13]}], "samples": [{"hash": "gyEmCBfcRH9", "uri": "/contracts/gyEmCBfcRH9#grounded-theory", "label": "Not Applicable", "score": 22.8559794328, "published": true}, {"hash": "52lVbU536ch", "uri": "/contracts/52lVbU536ch#grounded-theory", "label": "Not Applicable", "score": 20.9698836413, "published": true}], "size": 2, "hash": "591d1ee0b2b820fcda5356a4761b63fa", "id": 5}, {"snippet": "a practical guide. London: Sage Publications Inc. \u2587\u2587\u2587\u2587\u2587\u2587\u2587, \u2587. (1997). Instrumentation and Orchestration (2 ed.). New York: \u2587\u2587\u2587\u2587\u2587\u2587\u2587\u2587 Books. \u2587\u2587\u2587\u2587\u2587\u2587\u2587\u2587\u2587\u2587, \u2587. ([2007?]). Quintet for guitar and string quartet no. 4 in D major, G448 \"Fandango\". Elmsford: Music Minus One. \u2587\u2587\u2587\u2587\u2587\u2587\u2587\u2587\u2587\u2587, \u2587. (1989). Introduction, \u2587\u2587\u2587\u2587\u2587\u2587\u2587\u2587\u2587\u2587\u2587 and fugue. Ancona: B\u00e8rben. \u2587\u2587\u2587\u2587\u2587\u2587\u2587\u2587\u2587, \u2587. (2006). The debate on research in the arts. Bergen: Bergen National Acedemy of the Arts. \u2587\u2587\u2587\u2587\u2587\u2587\u2587\u2587\u2587, \u2587. (2010). The production of knowledge in artistic research. In \u2587. \u2587\u2587\u2587\u2587\u2587, & \u2587. \u2587\u2587\u2587\u2587\u2587\u2587\u2587\u2587 (Eds.),", "snippet_links": [{"key": "new-york", "type": "definition", "offset": [113, 121]}, {"key": "the-production", "type": "clause", "offset": [466, 480]}, {"key": "in-\u2587", "type": "clause", "offset": [516, 520]}], "samples": [{"hash": "gyEmCBfcRH9", "uri": "/contracts/gyEmCBfcRH9#grounded-theory", "label": "Not Applicable", "score": 22.8559794328, "published": true}, {"hash": "52lVbU536ch", "uri": "/contracts/52lVbU536ch#grounded-theory", "label": "Not Applicable", "score": 20.9698836413, "published": true}], "size": 2, "hash": "1b17fa278f97868af6f46b94991d94eb", "id": 6}, {"snippet": "In the final stages of analysis, I examined interview, survey, and observational data, both qualitative and quantitative, to arrive at a theory of authenticity that was based on my empirical research and informed by the literature and my conceptual and theoretical frameworks. Based on this wide range of data, I developed a theory of authenticity as integrated relevance, which I will discuss in greater detail in the final chapter.", "snippet_links": [{"key": "the-final", "type": "clause", "offset": [3, 12]}, {"key": "based-on", "type": "clause", "offset": [169, 177]}, {"key": "wide-range", "type": "definition", "offset": [291, 301]}], "samples": [{"hash": "5QP3pzzo5tS", "uri": "/contracts/5QP3pzzo5tS#grounded-theory", "label": "Distribution Agreement", "score": 21.4609074676, "published": true}], "size": 1, "hash": "df78ca8cfa2db128c66a8d5d3f048373", "id": 7}, {"snippet": "When I began this process, I did not have a clear direction as to how sustainability fit within the community building context of GLAM crowdsourcing. Therefore, I was going to need to let the data lead me in finding the specific questions to answer. I required an approach therefore that did three things specifically. Firsty, it was essential to be able to start with broad concepts and reach more narrow ones as research progressed. This is because I honestly did not know what I was looking for at first. I knew I had questions about education and relationship management and I needed the questions to emerge from the process in order to get to the specific elements of \u201csustainability\u201d that I think are relevant. Second, the process would need to be flexible and adaptable as concepts became either more or less relevant. This is because at the start there were a lot of questions, such as education\u2019s role in the process, which pretty quickly became clear that those ideas were not at all what I thought they were. My background as an educator caused me to frame my questions at first in this top-down perspective but that was not at all what was happening. For examples, volunteers who were teaching each other or community managers who felt that volunteers taught them highlighted the difficulty of such a perspective. I needed to be able to adjust to that sudden shift in focus from one framework to the other. Lastly, I need an approach that worked with surveys, interviews, and case studies because I had little in terms of a frame of reference for an approach so I would need to gather a broad spectrum of qualitative data to get an answer. In many ways, I was already very comfortable with the Grounded theory approach as a historian in my previous training. When interrogating an archive I would start with a broad set of questions and would write down the questions that occurred to me as I was reading. This would also lead to finding points of connection to other sources within the sources I was reading. Ground theory was just my adaptation of the process I was familiar with to the interview/qualitative data collection process. Additionally, I wanted to take an approach that was in a sense crowdsourced itself and Grounded Theory matched that ambition. The very idea of the project was to understand the impact as well as the sustainability of getting together groups of people and having them work collaboratively on a project. I also wanted my methodology to reflect this and Grounded theory allows for each set of interview or survey or case study subjects to have a slight impact on the direction of the questions and the next round of research. I wanted to crowdsource my crowdsource research. After the first round of interviews which involved six subjects, I coded the interviews and from those codes I used a Grounded Theory approach to help select future interview subjects from institutions and what topics to ask them about. The approach used was based on a coding methodology from \u2587\u2587\u2587\u2587\u2587\u2587\u2587 and \u2587\u2587\u2587\u2587\u2587\u2587\u2587\u2587 2015. This approach is designed specifically to gather qualitative data on a subject for which there is little existing research on in order to develop better research questions at the same time.191 Interviews were transcribed using first a Google API transcription program and then I manually corrected the transcriptions while listening to the audio recordings. Next, I proceeded to manually code each transcription using keyword analysis based on the questions asked. For example, I searched the text for keywords such as motivation, manager, and feedback to find examples within the interview where the significance of feedback and support from community managers was mentioned. I created a list of these key words as well as highlighted phrases and sentences where they were used and filed them together in a spreadsheet under headings related to the key themes of this research. Those headings included: education/training, support/feedback, previous experience, socialization, promotion/responsibility, gamification, difficulty/challenge, goal setting, personal benefit, ownership, and access/responsibility. Later, I created a word cloud from these texts to identify any additional keywords that appeared frequently but did not match any of the categories established for coding. The result of this search was the inclusion of the category threat/demotivation which was a topic that was originally intended to be discussed in interview questions but was not expanded upon by most interview subjects. The last category, COVID-19, was added in April 2020 because a question regarding the impact of lockdown procedures in the Spring and Summer of 2020 was added to several interviews. Over the course of interviews, there were groups of people interviewed in one-on-one interviews which helped to develop these categories over time. The first group of interview subjects selected were chosen 191 \u2587\u2587\u2587\u2587 \u2587\u2587\u2587\u2587\u2587\u2587\u2587 and \u2587\u2587\u2587\u2587\u2587\u2587 \u2587\u2587\u2587\u2587\u2587\u2587\u2587\u2587, eds., The Research Process, 7th ed. (Oxford, UK: \u2587\u2587\u2587\u2587 \u2587\u2587\u2587\u2587\u2587 & Sons, Incorporated, 2015). 185-199. because of their involvement in researching the subject of GLAM crowdsourcing which helped to provide a starting point for more specific questions and categories as well as future interview subjects. These first subjects included researchers, GLAM crowdsourcing project managers of multiple projects, and platform managers. The second group of subjects were made up of institutional stakeholders mostly with the title \u201ccommunity manager\u201d or \u201cproject manager\u201d who had first hand experience creating and organizing individual GLAM crowdsourcing projects. This group not only provided valuable insight into the institutional role regarding community sustainability but also provided multiple perspectives on the types of relationships managers form with volunteers. Additionally, these institutional stakeholders gave me permission to distribute surveys to volunteers working on their projects. The distribution of those surveys served as the primary recruitment tool for the third group of interview subjects which were volunteers. This group is the largest single cohort of interview subjects with sixteen respondents. While the questions asked of both group two and three followed the same themes they were slightly different in perspective and group three\u2019s responses focused more on individual relationships to the community while group two\u2019s responses focused more on the community as a holistic entity rather than a group made up of individuals. This slightly impacted how the data was organized as group two\u2019s coded keywords were kept together as an \u2018institutional perspective\u2019 grouping while group three\u2019s keywords were bundled together as \u2018individual perspective.\u2019", "snippet_links": [{"key": "community-building", "type": "definition", "offset": [100, 118]}, {"key": "the-data", "type": "clause", "offset": [188, 196]}, {"key": "specific-questions", "type": "clause", "offset": [220, 238]}, {"key": "relationship-management", "type": "clause", "offset": [551, 574]}, {"key": "in-order-to", "type": "clause", "offset": [629, 640]}, {"key": "be-flexible", "type": "clause", "offset": [751, 762]}, {"key": "in-the-process", "type": "definition", "offset": [911, 925]}, {"key": "case-studies", "type": "definition", "offset": [1488, 1500]}, {"key": "terms-of", "type": "definition", "offset": [1525, 1533]}, {"key": "frame-of-reference", "type": "clause", "offset": [1536, 1554]}, {"key": "broad-spectrum", "type": "definition", "offset": [1599, 1613]}, {"key": "qualitative-data", "type": "clause", "offset": [1617, 1633]}, {"key": "previous-training", "type": "clause", "offset": [1752, 1769]}, {"key": "write-down", "type": "definition", "offset": [1855, 1865]}, {"key": "points-of-connection", "type": "clause", "offset": [1950, 1970]}, {"key": "other-sources", "type": "definition", "offset": [1974, 1987]}, {"key": "the-interview", "type": "clause", "offset": [2097, 2110]}, {"key": "collection-process", "type": "clause", "offset": [2128, 2146]}, {"key": "the-project", "type": "clause", "offset": [2291, 2302]}, {"key": "methodology-to", "type": "clause", "offset": [2467, 2481]}, {"key": "study-subjects", "type": "definition", "offset": [2566, 2580]}, {"key": "next-round", "type": "definition", "offset": [2647, 2657]}, {"key": "first-round", "type": "clause", "offset": [2730, 2741]}, {"key": "the-approach", "type": "clause", "offset": [2957, 2969]}, {"key": "based-on", "type": "clause", "offset": [2979, 2987]}, {"key": "to-develop", "type": "definition", "offset": [3176, 3186]}, {"key": "research-questions", "type": "clause", "offset": [3194, 3212]}, {"key": "google-api", "type": "definition", "offset": [3276, 3286]}, {"key": "audio-recordings", "type": "clause", "offset": [3381, 3397]}, {"key": "for-example", "type": "definition", "offset": [3506, 3517]}, {"key": "feedback-and-support", "type": "clause", "offset": [3658, 3678]}, {"key": "from-community", "type": "clause", "offset": [3679, 3693]}, {"key": "a-list", "type": "definition", "offset": [3728, 3734]}, {"key": "key-words", "type": "clause", "offset": [3744, 3753]}, {"key": "related-to", "type": "clause", "offset": [3876, 3886]}, {"key": "previous-experience", "type": "clause", "offset": [3983, 4002]}, {"key": "goal-setting", "type": "definition", "offset": [4081, 4093]}, {"key": "personal-benefit", "type": "definition", "offset": [4095, 4111]}, {"key": "inclusion-of-the", "type": "clause", "offset": [4357, 4373]}, {"key": "interview-questions", "type": "clause", "offset": [4469, 4488]}, {"key": "april-2020", "type": "clause", "offset": [4585, 4595]}, {"key": "over-time", "type": "clause", "offset": [4862, 4871]}, {"key": "first-group", "type": "definition", "offset": [4877, 4888]}, {"key": "the-research", "type": "clause", "offset": [4976, 4988]}, {"key": "subject-of", "type": "clause", "offset": [5116, 5126]}, {"key": "provide-a", "type": "definition", "offset": [5162, 5171]}, {"key": "starting-point", "type": "clause", "offset": [5172, 5186]}, {"key": "project-managers", "type": "definition", "offset": [5330, 5346]}, {"key": "multiple-projects", "type": "clause", "offset": [5350, 5367]}, {"key": "second-group", "type": "definition", "offset": [5396, 5408]}, {"key": "the-title", "type": "definition", "offset": [5476, 5485]}, {"key": "community-manager", "type": "definition", "offset": [5487, 5504]}, {"key": "institutional-role", "type": "definition", "offset": [5676, 5694]}, {"key": "types-of", "type": "clause", "offset": [5777, 5785]}, {"key": "to-distribute", "type": "definition", "offset": [5897, 5910]}, {"key": "distribution-of", "type": "clause", "offset": [5964, 5979]}, {"key": "the-primary", "type": "clause", "offset": [6004, 6015]}, {"key": "third-group", "type": "definition", "offset": [6041, 6052]}, {"key": "group-two", "type": "definition", "offset": [6220, 6229]}], "samples": [{"hash": "9sT7aeaRqQc", "uri": "/contracts/9sT7aeaRqQc#grounded-theory", "label": "End User License Agreement", "score": 24.7159479808, "published": true}], "size": 1, "hash": "4480ca8117c39d229811573bf01d3446", "id": 8}, {"snippet": "Data analysis was conducted following the rigorous procedures of grounded theory (\u2587\u2587\u2587\u2587\u2587\u2587 & \u2587\u2587\u2587\u2587\u2587\u2587\u2587, 1967). Grounded theory is a systematic process to examine data, which iteratively compares codes and themes in interviews throughout analysis with the purpose of generating an inductive theory of phenomena, \u2018grounded\u2019 in data (\u2587\u2587\u2587\u2587\u2587\u2587 & \u2587\u2587\u2587\u2587\u2587\u2587\u2587, 1967). Grounded theory was chosen for this paper to rigorously examine men\u2019s perspectives and attitudes of IPV and recourse. To begin analysis, de-identified hard copies of 10 IDI transcripts and two FGD transcripts were read and memoed to initially capture broad themes and describe preliminary thoughts of behaviors seen within each interview. Memos then informed the creation of an initial codebook. The codebook included both deductive (derived from literature) and inductive (derived from the data) codes, and was systematically modified throughout analysis to better reflect phenomena within the interviews. The transcripts were then uploaded to MaxQDA11 software and subsequently coded with codes developed earlier. \u2587\u2587\u2587\u2587\u2587\u2587 was conducted independently; however, segments of de- identified transcripts were reviewed by other researchers to detect bias and reinforce reflexivity. Re-coding occurred when adjustments to the original codebook were made. The coding process ended once saturation was reached (i.e. no new information was emerging). Codes were compared across FGDs and IDIs to note consistent themes. Themes seen across all transcripts were further analyzed to find associated codes and discover depth and nuance within interviews. Primary themes and codes were used to generate a conceptual framework that reflects factors that contribute to men\u2019s conceptualization of IPV and attitudes toward women seeking recourse (see Figure 1). Among the Vietnamese men within this study, there was clear variation in views on what constituted violence. Subsequently, certain types of IPV that occurred within specific contexts were minimized, unrecognized as IPV, contextually justified, or completely justified. As such, contextually ambiguous IPV was not heavily supported as an incident that warranted formal recourse. Men\u2019s attitudes regarding recourse shifted depending on the context presented. The following are themes that emerged through grounded theory analysis: 1) inconsistent definitions of IPV, 2) minimized and unrecognized perpetration, 3) contextually justified IPV, 4) contextually dependent attitudes toward recourse seeking. Themes were then grouped together and presented as such to address aspects of the research questions posed.", "snippet_links": [{"key": "data-analysis", "type": "definition", "offset": [0, 13]}, {"key": "following-the", "type": "definition", "offset": [28, 41]}, {"key": "purpose-of", "type": "clause", "offset": [251, 261]}, {"key": "copies-of", "type": "definition", "offset": [508, 517]}, {"key": "the-data", "type": "clause", "offset": [839, 847]}, {"key": "reviewed-by", "type": "definition", "offset": [1157, 1168]}, {"key": "adjustments-to", "type": "clause", "offset": [1253, 1267]}, {"key": "the-original", "type": "definition", "offset": [1268, 1280]}, {"key": "no-new-information", "type": "clause", "offset": [1360, 1378]}, {"key": "to-note", "type": "clause", "offset": [1435, 1442]}, {"key": "to-generate", "type": "definition", "offset": [1628, 1639]}, {"key": "conceptual-framework", "type": "clause", "offset": [1642, 1662]}, {"key": "figure-1", "type": "definition", "offset": [1784, 1792]}, {"key": "types-of", "type": "clause", "offset": [1926, 1934]}, {"key": "the-context", "type": "clause", "offset": [2229, 2240]}, {"key": "definitions-of", "type": "clause", "offset": [2340, 2354]}, {"key": "research-questions", "type": "clause", "offset": [2578, 2596]}], "samples": [{"hash": "e7jW1jkUumw", "uri": "/contracts/e7jW1jkUumw#grounded-theory", "label": "Distribution Agreement", "score": 24.2968062676, "published": true}], "size": 1, "hash": "8e701e24a8835f648781ccccd3c2f95c", "id": 9}, {"snippet": "Grounded theory is a creative process that is appropriate to use when there is a lack of knowledge or theory of a topic. There is are no solutions provided by existing theory or availability for modifying existing theory, it identifies a series of events and how these change over time (Bluff, 2005, p. 147). As stated in \u2587\u2587\u2587\u2587\u2587\u2587\u2587\u2587 (2007, p. 62-63) the intent of grounded theory study is to move beyond description to generate discovery of a certain theory. The overall outcome of grounded theory should provide a theory or conceptual framework of processes, actions or interactions that are grounded in the research participant\u2019s view.", "snippet_links": [{"key": "creative-process", "type": "clause", "offset": [21, 37]}, {"key": "lack-of-knowledge", "type": "clause", "offset": [81, 98]}, {"key": "over-time", "type": "clause", "offset": [276, 285]}, {"key": "in-\u2587", "type": "clause", "offset": [319, 323]}, {"key": "to-generate", "type": "definition", "offset": [414, 425]}, {"key": "discovery-of", "type": "clause", "offset": [426, 438]}, {"key": "provide-a", "type": "definition", "offset": [503, 512]}, {"key": "conceptual-framework", "type": "clause", "offset": [523, 543]}, {"key": "research-participant", "type": "definition", "offset": [607, 627]}], "samples": [{"hash": "3WAUTKuOP1O", "uri": "/contracts/3WAUTKuOP1O#grounded-theory", "label": "Confidentiality Agreement", "score": 28.1126966743, "published": true}], "size": 1, "hash": "12ed35fafe085ca76912d575164dadbd", "id": 10}], "next_curs": "ClgSUmoVc35sYXdpbnNpZGVyY29udHJhY3RzcjQLEhZDbGF1c2VTbmlwcGV0R3JvdXBfdjU2Ihhncm91bmRlZC10aGVvcnkjMDAwMDAwMGEMogECZW4YACAA", "clause": {"children": [["axial-coding", "AXIAL CODING"], ["selective-coding", "SELECTIVE CODING"], ["open-coding", "Open Coding"]], "parents": [["conclusion", "Conclusion"], ["methods", "Methods"], ["research-approach", "Research approach"], ["data-analysis-method", "DATA-ANALYSIS METHOD"]], "title": "Grounded Theory", "size": 15, "id": "grounded-theory", "related": [["theory", "Theory", "Theory"], ["breach-of-contract", "Breach of Contract", "Breach of Contract"], ["no-consequential-or-punitive-damages", "No Consequential or Punitive Damages", "No Consequential or Punitive Damages"], ["breach-of-contract-claims", "Breach of Contract Claims", "Breach of Contract Claims"], ["notice-of-potential-claims", "Notice of Potential Claims", "Notice of Potential Claims"]], "related_snippets": [], "updated": "2025-07-07T12:36:13+00:00"}, "json": true, "cursor": ""}}