Human Rights Law. XXXXXX agrees to comply with Section 296, and all other pertinent provisions of Article 15 of the Executive Law (also known as the Human Rights Law) and all other Federal and State statutory and constitutional non-discrimination provisions and agrees to comply with all pertinent provisions of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990, and all pertinent regulations pursuant thereto.
Human Rights Law. Although international human rights law was originally conceived as a system to protect individuals from the excesses of the state,44 the tools for developing the state’s duty to protect individuals from other actors have been 36 See Xxxxxx, ‘Responsibility for injuries’, 95-96, 102. israel was not de jure recognized at the time, but its de facto control over the area served as a basis for responsibility, ibid., 102. 37 Reparation for Injuries Suffered in the Service of the United Nations, Advisory Opinion of 11 April 1949, 1949 iCJ Reports 174, at 175.
Human Rights Law. The practice of ERP is self evidently and straightforwardly a violation of many human rights, on account not only of its eventual purpose – torture, secret and arbitrary detention, or other serious violations – but also due to the procedural arbitrariness that attends the rendition. The following is a brief overview of affected rights and issues arising.
Human Rights Law. LESSEE agrees to comply with Section 296, and all other pertinent provisions of Article 15 of the Executive Law (also known as the Human Rights Law) and all other Federal and State statutory and constitutional non- discrimination provisions and agrees to comply with all pertinent provisions of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990, and all pertinent regulations pursuant thereto.
