Illustrative Examples. Set forth on Schedule 2.7 hereto are examples of the payments that may be made pursuant to Sections 2.3 and 2.4, which are being provided for illustrative purposes only and are not the sole examples of a particular concept or intended to be a representation as to any future payments.
Illustrative Examples. Matters on which Proxyholder shall be entitled to vote, pursuant to Section 2 include, but are not limited to, the following, which are presented here solely by way of example:
Illustrative Examples. Matters to which the voting arrangements described in Section 1 of this Agreement are applicable include, but are not limited to, the following, which are presented here solely by way of example:
Illustrative Examples. Exhibit J hereto provides examples for illustrative purposes only of calculations made pursuant to paragraphs (b), (c), (d) and (e) hereof. In the event of any conflict between Exhibit J and this Agreement, the provisions of this Agreement shall control.
Illustrative Examples. In this section, we revisit three examples that will be used to illustrate the kappa coeffi- cient, classical and adjusted degrees of distinguishabilities. ×
Illustrative Examples. The provisions of this Agreement relating to the First Earn-Out and the Second Earn-Out shall be interpreted and applied in a manner consistent with the examples set forth in Schedule 1.16(c) to this Agreement.
Illustrative Examples. Attached as Schedule D are examples of the manner in which this Section 2.7 would be applied in the scenarios described therein. Schedule D has been prepared for illustrative purposes only and is not intended to be binding on the Parties. Schedule D does not constitute a part of this Agreement.
Illustrative Examples. In this example we use 8 high quality reference arrays from affymetrix and one brain tumor file from the Erasmus Medical center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands (Xxxxxxx et al., 2010). The first are used to obtain calibration parameters, to be applied to the second. We start by setting the R working directory: > setwd("D:/SCALASuite"). Obtaining calibration parameters Place the affymetrix 250k NsP control files in the folder "D:/SCALASuite/01 raw/" and create the folder "D:/SCALASuite/02 raw/". Next we convert all cEL files in the first folder. File conversion We specify the chip type, read and save folder, as well as that no calibration should be applied; at this stage, calibration parameters are not yet available. > source("SCALA.convert.r") > SCALA.convert(datatype = 'Affy250kNSP', calibrate = F, readfolder = paste(getwd(),'/01 raw',sep = ""), savefolder = paste(getwd(),'/02 arrays',sep = "")) Converting ctr aff 1.CEL . Converting ctr aff 8.CEL Now that these files are converted and in stored R format, the next step is to call the genotypes for each array. estimate the calibration parameters. Genotype calling after genotyping, it is possible to a list of all converted files is obtained from the save directory defined above. Next the genotyping function is invoked. The semi-parametric estimation procedure is used, mixture plots for each chip are not requested, and the histogram is built from 100 by 100 bins. > source("SCALA.genotype.r") > fnames = list.files(path=paste(getwd(),"02 arrays",sep=""), full.names=T) > for (i in 1:length(fnames)) { load(fnames[i]) scala = SCALA.genotype(scala=scala, model="s", plot=F, save=T, xbins = 100, ybins = 100, lambda = 10, nit=50, crit=1e-4, savefolder = paste(getwd(),"/02 arrays",sep="")) } Calling ctr aff 1.CEL . Calling ctr aff 8.CEL The (partial) result for the first of the 8 affymetrix arrays shows that indeed the genotypes (and their cluster probabilities) have been added to the object and file, as well as the genotyping date. > str(scala) List of 8 $ meta :List of 7 ..$ fname : chr "ctr aff 1.CEL" ..
Illustrative Examples. ▪ An employee mandated for a full shift (8 hours), but who had not been subject to more than eight (8) Extended Mandations in the calendar year, shall receive $100 because they were mandated for more than four (4) hours. ▪ An employee mandated for a full shift (8 hours), who has also been subject to more than eight (8) Extended Mandations in the calendar year, shall receive $100 because they were mandated for more than four (4) hours and $100 because they had been subject to more than eight (8) Extended Mandations in that calendar year, for a total of $200. ▪ An employee who was mandated for two (2) hours beyond their normal shift, but had been subject to more than eight (8) Extended Mandations in the calendar year would receive $100 for those two (2) hours) ▪ An employee mandated for three (3) hours beyond their normal shift, who had been subject to fewer than eight (8) Extended DocuSign Envelope ID: F4B42344-61CC-4DAE-B761-AD08EBD2EDAC DocuSign Envelope ID: C840056F-0214-4D25-B751-2A2DB60975DB Mandations in the calendar year, would not receive the additional $100. When faced with a potential Mandation or Extended Mandation, the departmental supervisor shall follow the process described below:
Illustrative Examples. Except to the extent constituting an Excepted Matter, the matters on which Proxyholder shall be entitled to vote or act pursuant to Section 1.1 include, but are not limited to, the following, which are presented here solely by way of example:
