Non continuation. If the successor corporation does not continue an Award (or some portion such Award), the Administrator may provide that the Participant will fully vest in (and have the right to exercise) 100% of the then-unvested Shares subject to his or her outstanding Options and Stock Appreciation Rights, all restrictions on 100% of the Participant’s outstanding Restricted Stock and Restricted Stock Units will lapse, and, regarding 100% of Participant’s outstanding Awards with performance-based vesting, all performance goals or other vesting criteria will be treated as achieved at 100% of target levels and all other terms and conditions met, in all cases. In no event will vesting of an Award accelerate as to more than 100% of the Award. Unless specifically provided otherwise under the applicable Award Agreement or other written agreement authorized by the Administrator between the Participant and the Company or any of its Subsidiaries or Parents, as applicable, if Options or Stock Appreciation Rights are not continued when a Change in Control or a merger of the Company with or into another corporation or other entity occurs, the Administrator will notify the Participant in writing or electronically that the Participant’s vested Options or Stock Appreciation Rights (after considering the foregoing vesting acceleration, if any) will be exercisable for a period of time determined by the Administrator in its sole discretion and all of the Participant’s Options or Stock Appreciation Rights will terminate upon the expiration of such period (whether vested or unvested).
Non continuation. Mature (HESA Table T3a) University percentage of mature FT first degree entrants not in HE based on HESA published data March 2011 2009/10 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.08 0.08 0.08 Non continuation: LPN (HESA Table T3b) University percentage of young FT first degree entrants not in HE based on HESA published data March 2011 2009/10 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.07 0.07 0.06 Projected outcomes (HESA table T5) University combined total of projected learning outcomes of FT first degree students achieving degree (79%), other award (4%) or transfer (5%) based on HESA published data March 2011 2009/10 0.88 0.88 0.89 0.89 0.9 0.9
Non continuation. To develop a strategy for enhancing 2009-10 6.7% The latest HESA Performance To develop New targets To monitor To monitor To monitor LPN (HESA Table retention of LPN students. (4.6% Indicator data show that for 2008/09 a strategy to established performance performance performance T3b benchmark in 2009-10)) entrants, 6.7% of LPN students were no longer in HE by 2009/10 (missing enhance retention after 2012/13 against targets against targets against targets our benchmark by 2.1%).
Non continuation. Young (HESA Table T3a) Enhance retention of young full-time first degree entrants after year of entry 2009/10 9.6 9.5 9.4 9.3 9.2 9.1 Disabled Increase percentage of young full-time first degree entrants in reciept of Disabled Student Allowance 2009/10 2.8 3 3.5 4 4.5 4.8
Non continuation. Mature (HESA Table This is based on mature students who We have identified a statistically driven approach to this area and much of our 5 T3a)
Non continuation. Young (HESA Table T3a) Progression of students who entered via A2B is comparable to overall cohort No 2009-2010 93% 93.0% 94.0% 94.5% 95.0% 95.5% 96.0% 6 Completion/Non continuation (other - please give details in the next column) Percentage of students who entered via A2B gaining 2.1 or above No 2009-10 60% 62% 63% 64% 65% 65% 67% 7 Completion/Non continuation (other - please give details in the next column) Percentage of students who entered via A2B gaining a graduate level job within 6 months of graduating. No 2009-2010 69% 74% 75% 76% 77% 78% 79% 8 Postgraduate ITT: Gender (e.g. male primary teachers) We will not be setting additional milestones for ITT students but will be monitoring our recruitment and retention data as outlined in our original agreement No 9 Postgraduate ITT: Black and minority ethnic groups We will not be setting additional milestones for ITT students but will be monitoring our recruitment and retention data as outlined in our original agreement No 10 Postgraduate ITT: Location (e.g. low participation neighbourhoods, please give detail in the next co We will not be setting additional milestones for ITT students but will be monitoring our recruitment and retention data as outlined in our original agreement No 11 Postgraduate ITT: Socio-economic (e.g. NS-SEC, please give details in the next column) We will not be setting additional milestones for ITT students but will be monitoring our recruitment and retention data as outlined in our original agreement No 12 Postgraduate ITT: Completion / Non- continuation We will not be setting additional milestones for ITT students but will be monitoring our recruitment and retention data as outlined in our original agreement No 13 Postgraduate ITT: Low income backgrounds We will not be setting additional milestones for ITT students but will be monitoring our recruitment and retention data as outlined in our original agreement No 14 Postgraduate ITT: Disabled We will not be setting additional milestones for ITT students but will be monitoring our recruitment and retention data as outlined in our original agreement No Table 5b - Other milestones and targets ‐ Alongside applicant and entrant targets, we encourage you to provide targets around your outreach work (including collaborative outreach work where appropriate) or other initiatives to illustrate your progress towards increasing access. These should be measurable outcomes based targets and should focus on the number of pupils reached by a part...
Non continuation. Table 5b - Other milestones and targets ‐ Alongside applicant and entrant targets, we encourage you to provide targets around your outreach work (including collaborative outreach work where
Non continuation. Young (HESA Table T3a) To improve rate of those who continue or qualify at Xxxxxxx 2009-10 0.886 88.7 88.8 88.9 89 89.1 Non continuation: LPN (HESA Table T3b) To improve rate of those who continue or qualify at Xxxxxxx 2009-10 0.855 85.9 86.1 86.3 86.5 86.7 Completion/Non continuation (other - please give details in the next column) Peer mentoring and peer assisted study schemes 2011-12 target 50 mentees 100 mentees 120 mentees 140 mentees 160 mentees 160 mentees Completion/Non continuation (other - please give details in the next column) Targeted academic initiatives in subjects or programmes with lower performance No prior targeted investment Investment will be allocated on case by case basis according to need, based on internal management information and trends on student continuation and completion. Performance will be monitored annually for evidence of impact and improvement. Completion/Non continuation (other - please give details in the next column) Graduate employability programme No prior targeted investment 20 participants 25 participants 30 participants 35 participants 35 participants Target numbers are approximate proportion of programme. Ethnicity To increase % of BME entrants 2010-11 entry 0.058 6 6.2 6.4 6.6 6.8
Non continuation. A IBO may also voluntarily cancel his or her IBO Agreement by failing to renew the Agreement on its anniversary date.
Non continuation. To develop a strategy for enhancing 2009-10 6.7% The latest HESA Performance To develop New targets To monitor To monitor To monitor LPN (HESA Table retention of LPN students. (4.6% Indicator data show that for 2008/09 a strategy to established performance performance performance T3b benchmark in 2009-10)) entrants, 6.7% of LPN students were no longer in HE by 2009/10 (missing enhance retention after 2012/13 against targets against targets against targets our benchmark by 2.1%). Table 5b – Other milestones and targets Please select milestone/target type from the drop down menu Description Baseline year Baseline data Commentary (or textual description where numerical description is not appropriate) Yearly milestones/targets (numeric where possible) 2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 2015-16 2016-17 Outreach / WP activity (other) To ensure the University is working with the most disadvantaged schools and colleges by developing, implementing and monitoring a prioritisation model based on national indicators of school achievement and attainment and pupil disadvantage. 2012/13 n/a Publish new model and baseline Monitor against baseline Monitor against baseline Monitor against baseline Monitor against baseline Outreach / WP activity (collaborative) To work with partner HEIs in Greater Manchester to ensure that there is a coordinated package of pre-16 IAG and HE progression activities across each of Greater Manchester’s 10 local authorities and beyond into ‘hard to reach’ areas. 2012/13 n/a Develop and communicat e a common programme of work n/a n/a n/a n/a Outreach / WP activity (collaborative) To ensure the effectiveness of the University’s Information, Advice and Guidance (IAG) and awareness raising activities promoting access to HE (generally and to selective universities) including collaborative work with MMU and The University of Liverpool. 2012/13 n/a At least 70% of students taking part in pre-16 outreach activities understand ‘more’ or ‘a lot more’ about progressing to university. Also, in an annual survey of teachers at least 70% report that the University’s activities add ‘more’ or ‘a lot more’ value to their School IAG strategy. Monitor and publish % Monitor and publish % Monitor and publish % Monitor and publish % Monitor and publish % Strategic partnerships To increase the University’s contribution to governance arrangements in local schools, particularly those in challenging circumstances. 2011/12 n/a We will establish a baseline of current University staff w...
