Ordinance No. 7 Article XVII(a) of Ordinance No. 7 specifically authorized the Military Governor ―to mitigate, reduce or otherwise alter the sentence imposed by the tribunal, but may not increase the severity thereof.‖ That provision was adopted pursuant to Article III(2) of Law No. 10, which provided that ―[t]he tribunal by which persons charged with offenses hereunder shall be tried and the rules and procedure thereof shall be determined or designated by each Zone Conmmander for his respective Zone.‖ But did the latter justify the former? There are two problems here, one narrow and one broad. The narrow problem is that it is unclear whether the Control Council intended Article III(2) to authorize zone commanders to review the sentences imposed by the tribunals they created. It seems unlikely, given that Article III(5) of Law No. 10 specifically prohibited zone commanders from deferring ―the execution of death sentences‖ by more than one 167 Ministries, XIV TWC 552. 168 Id. at 546. 169 XxXxxx Clemency Decisions, 17. 170 Id. at 18. 171 XXXXXXXX, AMERICA’S GERMANY, 160. month ―after the sentence ha[d] become final.‖ Article III(5) seems to suggest that the Control Council did not view rules permitting sentence modifications as the kind of rule or procedure that Article III(2) permitted zone commanders to adopt. The broader problem involves the relationship between Law No. 10 and the IMT Charter. As noted in Chapter 10, Tribunal IV held in Ministries that Law No. 10 could not extend the jurisdiction of the NMTs beyond the Charter‘s provisions – to include crimes against humanity that did not satisfy the nexus requirement, for example – because Law No. 10 stated in its preamble that it was enacted ―to give effect to the terms of the London Agreement of 8 August 1945.‖172 The London Charter made the ―Control Council for Germany‖ as a whole responsible for modifying sentences of defendants convicted by the IMT; individual Allies had no such authority. The logic of Ministries thus suggests that insofar as the Control Council wanted to authorize individual Allies to modify the sentences imposed in their zonal trials, it had to condition such modifications on the agreement of all four Allies. Such a limitation would have been procedurally cumbersome, but it would not have been irrational – after all, Law No. 10 was specifically enacted ―to establish a uniform legal basis in Germany for the prosecution of war criminals and other similar offenders, other than those dealt with by ...
Ordinance No. 121482 of the City of Seattle, approved on May 26, 2004. Being an ordinance establishing a downtown parking and business improvement area; levying special assessments upon the businesses, multifamily residential or mixed-use projects within the area; providing for the deposit of revenues in a special account and expenditures therefrom; providing for collection of and penalties for delinquencies.
Ordinance No. 2529. The City of Camas agrees to take all necessary steps to amend Ordinance No. 2529, if necessary, to be consistent with this Amendment.
Ordinance No. 30-2023 AN ORDINANCE SUPPLEMENTAL TO THE ANNUAL APPROPRIATION ORDINANCE IN CONNECTION WITH THE TRAFFIC SAFETY BOARD. 163-23(OMB)
Ordinance No. 31 -2023 AN ORDINANCE SUPPLEMENTAL TO THE ANNUAL APPROPRIATION ORDINANCE IN CONNECTION WITH THE DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS. 164-23(OMB)
Ordinance No. 44_6_4 - 2015 EXHIBIT X-0 XXXXXXX XX XXXXXXX XXXXXXX AN ORDINANCE AMENDING SECTION 7-9-1, SOLID WASTE AND RECYCLING, AND SECTION 12-4-5, BILLING, OF THE XXXXXXX ESTATES MUNICIPAL CODE
Ordinance No of the Xxxxxx of the University of Wrocław of on tuition fees charged for studies at the University of Wrocław in academic year.
Ordinance No for Adoption of the Specific Plan (SP2019-0003); (e) Ordinance No. for adoption of the Beaumont Pointe Sign Program (PLAN2022-0856) (“Sign Program”); (g) Resolution No. for adoption of Vesting Tentative Parcel Map No. 38161 (PM2022-0014) (“TPM”); (g) Ordinance No. for adoption of this Agreement (PLAN2023-0906) and (h) Resolution No. for Minor Amendment to the Western Riverside County Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan; (collectively, Owner’s application for this Agreement and its related applications for the GPA, Pre-Zoning, Specific Plan, Sign Program, TPM, and EIR inclusive of the MMRP are referenced in the aggregate as the “Entitlement Applications”). The approvals granted as requested by the Entitlement Applications in connection with the development of the Project as intended and proposed, whether effective upon the Effective Date or upon Annexation, and as further itemized on Exhibit “B” are referenced in the aggregate herein as the “Existing Project Approvals”.
Ordinance No. 14-09: Dated May 20, 2014, by the City of El Centro pre-zoning the unincorporated territory adjoining the City to ML (Light Manufacturing). EXHIBIT - F 2) RESOLUTION NO. 14-37: Dated May 20, 2014, by the City of El Centro certifying a negative declaration of environmental impacts under CEQA. EXHIBIT - G 3) RESOLUTION NO. 14-38: Dated May 20, 2014, by the City of El Centro approving / recommending the annexation. EXHIBIT - H 4) RESOLUTION NO. 14-42: Approving the Tax Sharing Agreement with the County of Imperial. EXHIBIT - I
Ordinance No. 2008-08 of January 23, 2008 relating to the Civil Aviation Code, Article 215 The commercial transport of persons and goods between two points in the Republic of Côte d’Ivoire is reserved for Ivorian carriers subject to special and temporary derogations. Annex II Non-Conforming Measures referred to in paragraph 2 of Article 7
