PANEL DECISION Sample Clauses

PANEL DECISION. The Appeals Panel makes the following FINDINGS OF FACT and CONCLUSIONS OF LAW and enters the following decision pursuant to section 10 of the Appeal Guidelines:
Sample 1Sample 2Sample 3See All (68)
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
PANEL DECISION. The Panel Decision referenced in Section Three above shall be by majority vote, and may be any of the following: (a) The Panel votes in favor of reclassification, and proceeds as follows: (1) The Chairperson shall forward to the Commissioner of Administrative Services (through the Chief Human Resources Officer (Chief HRO)) a recommendation for reclassification, along with a complete record of grievance material. (2) The Chief HRO shall then appoint an HR Professional experienced in classification to review the grievance material, and to convene a brief meeting with the entire Reclass Panel, to discuss their recommendation. (3) The HR Professional appointed by the Chief HRO shall review the Panel’s recommendation, and, on behalf of the Chief HRO, sustain or deny the grievance. Such decision shall be final and binding upon the parties. (b) The Panel sustains the appeal and payment for service in the higher class is authorized, consistent with Section Six, but reclassification is not recommended because: (1) Existing merit system conditions do not permit appointment; (2) The organizational structure and/or staffing conditions do not support the additional position; (3) Of other reason (state reason). The Department of Administrative Services will review the work experience of the employee, to validate that s/he meets the minimum experience and training requirements for the higher-level classification, which is a condition of TSHC payment. (c) The Panel denies the appeal.
Sample 1Sample 2Sample 3See All (4)
PANEL DECISION. On December 5, 2012,
Sample 1Sample 2Sample 3
PANEL DECISION. The Panel Decision referenced in Section Three above shall be by majority vote, and may be any of the following: (a) The Panel votes in favor of reclassification, and proceeds as follows: (1) The Chairperson shall forward to the Commissioner of Administrative Services (through the Chief Human Resources Officer) a recommendation for reclassification, along with a complete record of grievance material. (2) The Chief HRO/designee may convene a brief meeting with the entire Reclass Panel, to discuss their recommendation. The Chief HRO/designee shall review the Panel’s recommendation, and sustain or deny the grievance. Such decision shall be final and binding upon the parties. (b) The Panel sustains the appeal and payment for service in the higher class is authorized, consistent with Section Six, but reclassification is not recommended because: (1) existing merit system conditions do not permit appointment; (2) the organizational structure and/or staffing conditions do not support the additional position; (3) other reason (state reason). (4) The Department of Administrative Services will review the work experience of the employee, to validate that s/he meets the minimum experience and training requirements for the higher-level classification, which is a condition of TSHC payment. (c) The Panel denies the appeal.
Sample 1Sample 2
PANEL DECISION. [REDACTED] makes the following FINDINGS OF FACT and CONCLUSIONS OF LAW and enters the following decision pursuant to section 10 of the Appeal Guidelines:
Sample 1
PANEL DECISION. The Panel Decision referenced in Section Three above shall be by majority vote, and may be any of the following: (a) The Panel votes in favor of reclassification, and proceeds as follows: (1) The Chairperson shall forward to the Commissioner of Administrative Services (through the Chief Human Resources Officer (Chief HRO)) a recommendation for reclassification, along with a complete record of grievance material. (2) The Chief HRO shall then appoint an HR Professional experienced in classification to review the grievance material, and to convene a brief meeting with the entire Reclass Panel, to discuss their recommendation. (3) The HR Professional appointed by the Chief HRO shall review the Panel’s recommendation, and, on behalf of the Chief HRO, sustain or deny the grievance. Such decision shall be final and binding upon the parties. (b) The Panel sustains the appeal and payment for service in the higher class is authorized, consistent with Section Six, but reclassification is not recommended because: (1) Existing merit system conditions do not permit appointment; (2) The organizational structure and/or staffing conditions do not support the additional position; (3) Of other reason (state reason). (c) The Panel denies the appeal.
Sample 1
PANEL DECISION. There are 5 potential outcomes from an individual panel meeting, the case may be Approved Declined Deferred (often as a result of inadequate information) Referred to an alternative forum e.g. medicines management Require consideration as service development through the Investment / Disinvestment Process The outcome of the IFR meeting will be conveyed to the referring clinician and patient’s GP together with the patient within 5 working days of the meeting and advice provided regarding what steps could be taken if they, or their patient, are unhappy with the outcome. The referring clinician will be requested as standard to discuss the outcome of the case with the patient in a face to face meeting. If the clinician or patient is unhappy with the Panel decision they have two options open to them.
Sample 1
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
PANEL DECISION. RESPONDENT
Sample 1

Related to PANEL DECISION

  • Arbitration Decision The arbitrator’s decision will be final and binding. The arbitrator shall issue a written arbitration decision revealing the essential findings and conclusions upon which the decision and/or award is based. A party’s right to appeal the decision is limited to grounds provided under applicable federal or state law.

  • Final Decision Concessionaire covenants that the decision of the Commissioner of Department, relative to the performance of the terms and conditions of this Agreement, shall be final and conclusive.

  • Arbitration Decisions Unless otherwise agreed by the Parties, the arbitrator(s) shall render a decision within ninety (90) Calendar Days of appointment and shall notify the Parties in writing of such decision and the reasons therefor. The arbitrator(s) shall be authorized only to interpret and apply the provisions of this LGIA and shall have no power to modify or change any provision of this Agreement in any manner. The decision of the arbitrator(s) shall be final and binding upon the Parties, and judgment on the award may be entered in any court having jurisdiction. The decision of the arbitrator(s) may be appealed solely on the grounds that the conduct of the arbitrator(s), or the decision itself, violated the standards set forth in the Federal Arbitration Act or the Administrative Dispute Resolution Act. The final decision of the arbitrator(s) must also be filed with FERC if it affects jurisdictional rates, terms and conditions of service, Interconnection Facilities, or Network Upgrades.

  • Claim Decision Upon receipt of such claim, the Plan Administrator shall respond to such claimant within ninety (90) days after receiving the claim. If the Plan Administrator determines that special circumstances require additional time for processing the claim, the Plan Administrator can extend the response period by an additional ninety (90) days for reasonable cause by notifying the claimant in writing, prior to the end of the initial ninety (90) day period, that an additional period is required. The notice of extension must set forth the special circumstances and the date by which the Plan Administrator expects to render its decision. If the claim is denied in whole or in part, the Plan Administrator shall notify the claimant in writing of such denial. The Plan Administrator shall write the notification in a manner calculated to be understood by the claimant. The notification shall set forth: (i) The specific reasons for the denial; (ii) The specific reference to pertinent provisions of the Agreement on which the denial is based; (iii) A description of any additional information or material necessary for the claimant to perfect the claim and an explanation of why such material or information is necessary; (iv) Appropriate information as to the steps to be taken if the claimant wishes to submit the claim for review and the time limits applicable to such procedures; and (v) A statement of the claimant’s right to bring a civil action under ERISA Section 502(a) following an adverse benefit determination on review.

  • The Decision If mediation fails, or is not appropriate, and if the decision can be rendered after a short deliberation, the Arbitrator will do so. By meeting first with counsel to explain the framework of the Arbitrator’s decision, the parties are provided with an opportunity to influence the exact terms of resolution. Within the framework of settlement as outlined by the Arbitrator, the parties can work out exact terms which best suit the specifics of the case. Such an opportunity should not be wasted by continuing to argue the merits of the case.

  • Arbitrator’s Decision Within thirty (30) days after the appointment of the third arbitrator, the three (3) arbitrators shall decide whether the parties will use Landlord’s or Tenant’s submitted Fair Market Rental Value and shall notify Landlord and Tenant of their decision. The decision of the majority the three (3) arbitrators shall be binding on Landlord and Tenant.

  • Initial Decision Maker The Architect will serve as the Initial Decision Maker pursuant to Article 15 of AIA Document A201–2017, unless the parties appoint below another individual, not a party to this Agreement, to serve as the Initial Decision Maker.

  • Decision Making The Joint Development Committee and Joint Commercialization Committee shall each act by unanimous agreement of its members, with each Party having one vote. If the Joint Development Committee or Joint Commercialization Committee, after [* * *] (or such other period as the Parties may otherwise agree) of good faith efforts to reach a unanimous decision on an issue, fails to reach such a unanimous decision, then either Party may refer such issue to the Executive Officers. Such Executive Officers shall meet promptly thereafter and shall negotiate in good faith to resolve the issues. If Executive Officers cannot resolve such issue within [* * *] of referral of such issue to the Executive Officers, the resolution of such issue shall be as follows: (a) if such issue properly originated at the Joint Development Committee, determined by the Developing Party of the relevant Licensed Compound or Licensed Product at issue; provided that, notwithstanding the foregoing: (i) if Acceleron is the Developing Party and such issue relates to (x) the approval of an Additional Development Disease, or (y) matters under Section 5.6.3(d), then such issue shall be determined by [* * *]; (ii) regardless of which Party is the Developing Party, such issue shall be determined by [* * *] following the earliest of: (x) [* * *], and (y) the Joint Development Committee’s decision to go forward with a Phase 3 Clinical Trial of the relevant Licensed Compound or Licensed Product; provided that [* * *] shall continue to determine any issues that relate to the budget for and the conduct of the [* * *]; and (iii) regardless of which Party is the Developing Party, such issue shall be determined by [* * *] following the earliest of: (x) [* * *], and (y) the occurrence of any [* * *]; and (b) if such issue properly originated at the Joint Commercialization Committee, determined by Celgene. Notwithstanding the foregoing, none of Acceleron, Celgene, the Joint Development Committee or the Joint Commercialization Committee may make any decision inconsistent with the express terms of this Agreement without the prior written consent of each Party.

  • Independent Decision The Investor is not relying on the Issuer or on any legal or other opinion in the materials reviewed by the Investor with respect to the financial or tax considerations of the Investor relating to its investment in the Shares. The Investor has relied solely on the representations and warranties, covenants and agreements of the Issuer in this Agreement (including the exhibits and schedules hereto) and on its examination and independent investigation in making its decision to acquire the Shares.

  • Review of Decision Within sixty (60) days after the Secretary’s receipt of a request for review, he or she will review the Company’s determination. After considering all materials presented by the Claimant, the Secretary will render a written opinion, written in a manner calculated to be understood by the Claimant, setting forth the specific reasons for the decision and containing specific references to the pertinent provisions of this Agreement on which the decision is based. If special circumstances require that the sixty (60) day time period be extended, the Secretary will so notify the Claimant and will render the decision as soon as possible, but no later than one hundred twenty (120) days after receipt of the request for review.

Draft better contracts in just 5 minutes Get the weekly Law Insider newsletter packed with expert videos, webinars, ebooks, and more!