Recognition of Judgments. Any final judgment for a fixed sum of money rendered by a New York Court having jurisdiction under New York law in respect of any suit, action or proceeding against the Company based upon this Agreement would be recognized and enforced against the Company by Cayman Islands courts without re-examining the merits of the case under the common law doctrine of obligation; provided that such judgment is (A) given by a foreign court of competent jurisdiction; (B) imposes on the judgment debtor a liability to pay a liquidated sum for which the judgment has been given; (C) is final; (D) is not in respect of taxes, a fine or a penalty; and (E) was not obtained in a manner and is not of a kind the enforcement of which is contrary to natural justice or the public policy of the Cayman Islands.
Recognition of Judgments. The courts of the Cayman Islands would recognize as a valid judgment, a final and conclusive judgment in personam obtained in the New York Courts against the Company based upon this Agreement under which a sum of money is payable (other than a sum of money payable in respect of multiple damages, taxes or other charges of a like nature or in respect of a fine or other penalty) or, in certain circumstances, an in personam judgment for non-monetary relief, and would give a judgment based thereon provided that (A) such courts had proper jurisdiction over the parties subject to such judgment; (B) such courts did not contravene the rules of natural justice of the Cayman Islands; (C) such judgment was not obtained by fraud; (D) the enforcement of the judgment would not be contrary to the public policy of the Cayman Islands; (E) no new admissible evidence relevant to the action is submitted prior to the rendering of the judgment by the courts of the Cayman Islands; and (F) there is due compliance with the correct procedures under the laws of the Cayman Islands.
Recognition of Judgments. Except as described under the section “Enforceability of Civil Liabilities” in the Time of Sale Prospectus and the Prospectus, the courts of the Cayman Islands, British Virgin Islands, and Hong Kong would recognize as a valid judgment any final monetary judgment obtained against the Company in the courts of the State of New York.
Recognition of Judgments. Except as described under the section “Enforceability of Civil Liabilities” in the Prospectus, the courts of the BVI, Hong Kong, and Malaysia would recognize as a valid judgment any final monetary judgment obtained against the Company in the courts of the State of New York.
Recognition of Judgments. Subject to the section “Enforcement of Civil Liabilities” of the Prospectus, the courts of the Cayman Islands would recognize a valid, final monetary judgment obtained against the Company in the courts of the State of New York.
Recognition of Judgments. Although there is no statutory enforcement in the Cayman Islands of judgments obtained in the courts of the State of New York, such judgments will be recognized and enforced in the courts of the Cayman Islands at common law, without any re-examination of the merits of the underlying dispute, by an action commenced on the foreign judgment debt in the Grand Court of the Cayman Islands, provided such judgment is given by a foreign court of competent jurisdiction, imposes on the judgment debtor a liability to pay a liquidated sum for which the judgment has been given, is final, is not in respect of taxes, a fine or a penalty, and was not obtained in a manner and is not of a kind the enforcement of which is contrary to natural justice or the public policy of the Cayman Islands.
Recognition of Judgments. Any final judgment for a fixed sum of money rendered by a New York Court having jurisdiction under New York law in respect of any suit, action or proceeding against the Company based upon this Agreement would be recognized and enforced against the Company by Japan courts without re-examining the merits of the case under the common law doctrine of obligation; provided that (A) the jurisdiction of such New York Court is admitted under the laws of Japan (as of the date of this Agreement, the laws of Japan would admit the jurisdiction over the Company of such New York Court in such legal suit, action or proceeding), (B) the Company has received service of process otherwise than by a public notice or other method comparable thereto or has appeared before such New York Court, (C) neither the judgment of such New York Court nor the relevant proceeding is repugnant to public policy as applied in Japan and (D) there exists reciprocity as to the recognition by a New York Court of a final judgment obtained in a Japanese court.
Recognition of Judgments. Any final judgment for a fixed sum of money rendered by a New York Court having jurisdiction under New York law in respect of any suit, action or proceeding against the Company based upon this Agreement would be recognized and enforced against the Company by Cayman Islands courts without re-examining the merits of the case under the common law doctrine of obligation; provided that such judgment is (A) given by a foreign court of competent jurisdiction; (B) imposes on the judgment debtor a liability to pay a liquidated sum for which the judgment has been given; (C) is final; (D) is not in respect of taxes, a fine or a penalty; (E) was not obtained in a manner and is not of a kind the enforcement of which is contrary to natural justice or the public policy of the Cayman Islands; and (F) in obtaining judgment there was no fraud on the part of the person in whose favour judgment was given or on the part of the New York Court.
Recognition of Judgments. A judgment for a definite sum of money which is rendered by a State or Federal Court located in the State of New York against any of the German Companies for the enforcement of its obligations under the Relevant Documents would be recognized and could be enforced in Germany without re-examination of the substance of the case decided by such court.
Recognition of Judgments. A final and conclusive judgment (not subject to appeal) of the state court of the State of New York or any or U.S. federal court located in the City and County of New York for the payment of money rendered against the Company in respect of this Agreement and the Deposit Agreement, would be recognized by the courts of Mexico; provided, inter alia, that: (A) such judgment is obtained in compliance with the legal requirements of the jurisdiction of the court rendering such judgment, and in compliance with all legal requirements of this Agreement, the Deposit Agreement and Mexican law; (B) such judgment is strictly for the payment of a certain sum of money and has been rendered in an in personam action (as opposed to an in rem action); (C) service of process in the action was made personally and on the defendant or on a duly appointed process agent and as a result of service of process the defendant had an opportunity to answer any lawsuit, be heard and provide evidence in connection therewith; (D) such judgment does not contravene Mexican law, public policy of Mexico, international treaties or agreements binding upon Mexico or generally accepted principles of international law (the contravention of public policy of Mexico is always a matter of judicial interpretation in Mexico); (E) the applicable procedures under the laws of Mexico with respect to the enforcement of foreign judgments (including, but not limited to, the issuance of a letter rogatory by the competent authority of such jurisdiction requesting enforcement of such judgment as being final judgments and the certification of such judgment as authentic by the corresponding authorities of such jurisdiction in accordance with the laws thereof) are complied with; (F) such judgment is final in the jurisdiction where obtained; (G) the action in respect of which such judgment is rendered is not the subject matter of a lawsuit among the same parties pending before a Mexican court; (H) the courts of such jurisdiction recognize the principles of reciprocity in connection with the enforcement of Mexican judgments in such jurisdiction; and (I) such judgment does not contravene a final judgment of a Mexican court on the same subject between the parties thereto.
