Results-Based Financing Sample Clauses

Results-Based Financing. Implementation of results-based financing pilots aimed at gauging the effectiveness of supply-side innovations including: (i) provision of Performance-Based Payments to health care providers; (ii) testing innovations in the hospital sector aimed at strengthening performance; and (iii) carrying out an impact evaluation to assess and document the effects of the pilots SCHEDULE 2 Project Execution
Sample 1
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Results-Based Financing. 2.2.1. Enhancing controls in budget execution and reporting.
Sample 1
Results-Based Financing. SIBs and DIBs are a form of Results-based Financing (RbF). RbF, also known as outcomes-based financing, is an umbrella term for approaches and financing instruments that links rewards and payments with outcomes and performance (Urban Institute, 2016). Other terms associated with or nested under RbF include pay-for-performance, performance-based financing, and pay-for-success. The foundation of RbF starts with an output- or outcomes-based financing agreement that incentivizes quality and outcomes and often makes final payment conditional upon achieving these results. By tying financing to results or outcomes, RbF approaches enable governments, multilaterals, and other organizations to ensure funds are effectively directed and that service providers and funders are held accountable (Xxxxxxxxxx-Xxxxxx, Xxxxxxx-Xxxxx, Xxxxxx, & Xxxxxxx, 2017). The model therefore also aims to sharpen results measurement and demonstration and improve service delivery. Many iterations of RbF continue to emerge, especially in the global development and health space. A 2016 Urban Institute report offered a simple RbF categorization approach by looking at differences across four characteristics: investor type, type of results, recipient, and timing. Table 2A in the Appendix shows common RbF approaches with their specific set of characteristics. RbF can also be categorized as supply-side, demand-side, or a mixed mechanism RbF (Xxxxxxxx, 2013). Supply-side RbF, or performance-based financing, focuses on setting incentives for service providers like health systems, facilities, or physicians. The provider must meet certain performance indicators or results to receive full payment or reimbursement, for example. Demand-side RbF approaches, like conditional cash transfers (CCT), conversely target individuals or beneficiaries in a market. In a CCT scheme, targeted beneficiaries receive a predefined payment for meeting certain requirements like receiving vaccinations or attending check-ups. In some scenarios, both demand- and supply-side RbF approaches can be combined into a mixed mechanism like a voucher system where individuals and providers are incentivized to receive certain healthcare services.
Sample 1

Related to Results-Based Financing

  • Third Party Financing If Product acquisitions are financed through any third party financing, Contractor may be required as a condition of Contract Award to agree to the terms and conditions of a “Consent & Acknowledgment Agreement” in a form acceptable to the Commissioner.

  • Initial Forecasts/Trunking Requirements Because Verizon’s trunking requirements will, at least during an initial period, be dependent on the Customer segments and service segments within Customer segments to whom CSTC decides to market its services, Verizon will be largely dependent on CSTC to provide accurate trunk forecasts for both inbound (from Verizon) and outbound (to Verizon) traffic. Verizon will, as an initial matter, provide the same number of trunks to terminate Reciprocal Compensation Traffic to CSTC as CSTC provides to terminate Reciprocal Compensation Traffic to Verizon. At Verizon’s discretion, when CSTC expressly identifies particular situations that are expected to produce traffic that is substantially skewed in either the inbound or outbound direction, Verizon will provide the number of trunks CSTC suggests; provided, however, that in all cases Verizon’s provision of the forecasted number of trunks to CSTC is conditioned on the following: that such forecast is based on reasonable engineering criteria, there are no capacity constraints, and CSTC’s previous forecasts have proven to be reliable and accurate.

  • Equity Financing If there is an Equity Financing before the expiration or termination of this instrument, the Company will automatically issue to the Investor a number of shares of Safe Preferred Stock equal to the Purchase Amount divided by the Conversion Price. In connection with the issuance of Safe Preferred Stock by the Company to the Investor pursuant to this Section 1(a):

  • MFMP Transaction Fee Reports The Contractor shall submit complete monthly MFMP Transaction Fee Reports to the Department. Reports are due 15 calendar days after the end of each month. Information on how to submit MFMP Transaction Fee Reports online can be located at xxxxx://xxx.xxx.xxxxxxxxx.xxx/business_operations/state_ purchasing/myfloridamarketplace/mfmp_vendors/transaction_fee_and_reporting. Assistance with transaction fee reporting is also available by email at xxxxxxxxxxxxx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx.xxx or telephone at 866-FLA-EPRO (866-352- 3776) from 8:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m. Eastern Time.

  • PRIORITY HIRING CONSIDERATIONS If this Contract includes services in excess of $200,000, the Contractor shall give priority consideration in filling vacancies in positions funded by the Contract to qualified recipients of aid under Welfare and Institutions Code Section 11200 in accordance with Pub. Contract Code §10353.

  • Measuring DNS parameters Every minute, every DNS probe will make an UDP or TCP “DNS test” to each of the public-­‐DNS registered “IP addresses” of the name servers of the domain name being monitored. If a “DNS test” result is undefined/unanswered, the tested IP will be considered unavailable from that probe until it is time to make a new test.

  • FISCAL IMPACT/FINANCING There will be no impact to the County General Fund.

  • Budget Narrative Services are strictly paid as cost reimbursement. No funds will be paid for services not provided.

  • Table 7b - Other milestones and targets Reference Number Select stage of the lifecycle Please select target type from the drop-down menu Description (500 characters maximum) Is this a collaborative target? Baseline year Baseline data Yearly milestones (numeric where possible, however you may use text) Commentary on your milestones/targets or textual description where numerical description is not appropriate (500 characters maximum)

  • Measuring EPP parameters Every 5 minutes, EPP probes will select one “IP address” of the EPP servers of the TLD being monitored and make an “EPP test”; every time they should alternate between the 3 different types of commands and between the commands inside each category. If an “EPP test” result is undefined/unanswered, the EPP service will be considered as unavailable from that probe until it is time to make a new test.

Draft better contracts in just 5 minutes Get the weekly Law Insider newsletter packed with expert videos, webinars, ebooks, and more!