Revenue Growth Sample Clauses

Revenue Growth. This sub-module provides the airline with the ability to set revenue growth targets either by market or corporation. Additional accrual can apply if target levels are reached.
Sample 1Sample 2Sample 3
Revenue Growth. As to 40% of the Target Award, the Performance Measure shall be revenue growth measured against a base amount of revenue for the year ended December 31, 2010 (or equivalent for non-calendar year companies).
Sample 1
Revenue Growth. Borrower will achieve minimum quarterly revenue growth of 7% over the previous quarter (with December 31, 2001 revenue figure as benchmark).
Sample 1
Revenue Growth. The objective of the Revenue Growth KPI is to annually increase the aggregate revenue from local, foreign, and national advertising, including Internet and other “non-traditional” revenue sources from which XXXXX has sales responsibility. CBD strongly supports customers choosing the sales channel that best satisfies their advertising and servicing needs within CBD’s existing guidelines. • Performance Criteria: - Minimal KPI = [*] - Objective KPI = [*] • Given the wide range of revenue forecasts, a structure whereby several revenue sources will be used to develop the annual “Industry Average.” The annual “Industry Average” will be the weighted average of the sources listed below. The following sources have been selected due to their relative accuracy, general availability and representation of industry performance. (a) YPIMA’s reported actual revenue growth for Regional Xxxx Operating Companies (RBOC) for the previous calendar year as coordinated and supplied by YPIMA. The forecast will include all local and national advertising revenue, including Internet. This component will carry a 50% weighting factor used in determining the overall “Industry Average.” In the unlikely event YPIMA is unable to provide an industry growth report, both parties agree to use, and mutually agree upon selecting an alternative third-party source. If both parties can not agree upon an alternative third-party source, the “Industry Average” measure will be based solely (100%) on the weighted average of the select markets defined in (b). (b) The weighted average of actual sales performance for select and comparable markets within the Xxxx South Region (“BAPCO”), Xxxxx’x South Central Area (“SCA”) and Xxxxx’x Independent Line of Business (“BILOB”), excluding CBD revenue. This component will carry a 50% weighting factor used in determining the overall “Industry Average,” unless provision in (a) above is executed. Select markets are as follows:
Sample 1
Revenue Growth. Each input for these ratios must be linked to the model and data set or provide for separate easy input by municipal officials.
Sample 1
Revenue Growth. The Company’s compounded annual growth rate (“CAGR”) for the Measurement Period. The Secondary Performance Metrics may adjust the Primary Metric Award in accordance with the table below: PerformanceLevel TCE/RWA(vs. Peer Group) Efficiency Ratio CAGR Adjustment toPrimary MetricAward(1) Threshold 25th Percentile 73% 3% -20% Target Peer Median 70% 6% 0% Significant Overachievement 75th Percentile 67% 8% +20% Relative Weight 33% 33% 33% (1) Interpolation between performance levels shall be measured on a straight line basis. (2) Subject to the Administrator’s discretion.
Sample 1
Revenue Growth. As to 40% of the Target Award, the Performance Measure shall be revenue growth.
Sample 1
Revenue Growth. The Corporation must achieve a compounded growth rate in gross revenue of 20% for each year from 1997 through 1999.
Sample 1
Revenue Growth. As mutually agreed, Intelligent will assist Xxxxx in achieving both long term and short term plans for revenue growth.
Sample 1

Related to Revenue Growth

  • Performance Metrics The “Performance Metrics” for the Performance Period are: (i) the JD Power Residential National Large Segment Survey for investor-owned utilities; (ii) the System Average Interruption Frequency Index (Major Events Excluded) (“XXXXX”); (iii) Arizona Public Service Company’s customer to employee improvement ratio; (iv) the OSHA rate (All Incident Injury Rate); (v) nuclear capacity factor; and (vi) coal capacity factor. (1) With respect to the Performance Metric described in clause (i) of this Subsection 6(a), the JD Power Residential National Large Segment Survey will provide data on an annual basis reflecting the Company’s percentile ranking, relative to other participating companies. (2) With respect to the Performance Metric described in clause (ii) of this Subsection 6(a), the Edison Electric Institute (“EEI”) will provide data on an annual basis regarding the XXXXX result of the participating companies; the Company will calculate its XXXXX result for the year in question and determine its percentile ranking based on the information provided by EEI. (3) With respect to the Performance Metric described in clause (iii) of this Subsection 6(a), SNL, an independent third party data system, will provide data on an annual basis regarding the customer and employee counts; the Company will use its customer and employee counts for the year in question and determine its percentile ranking based on the information provided by SNL. Only those companies whose customers and employees were included in the data provided by SNL in each of the years of the Performance Period will be considered. (4) With respect to the Performance Metric described in clause (iv) of this Subsection 6(a), EEI will provide data on an annual basis regarding the OSHA rate of the participating companies; the Company will calculate its OSHA rate for the year in question and determine its percentile ranking based on the information provided by EEI. (5) With respect to the Performance Metric described in clause (v) of this Subsection 6(a), SNL will provide data on an annual basis regarding the nuclear capacity factors of the participating nuclear plants; the Company will calculate its nuclear capacity factor for the year in question and determine its percentile ranking based on the information provided by SNL. Only those plants that were included in the data provided by SNL in each of the years of the Performance Period will be considered. (6) With respect to the Performance Metric described in clause (vi) of this Subsection 6(a), SNL will provide data on an annual basis regarding the coal capacity factors of the participating coal plants; the Company will calculate its coal capacity factor for the year in question and determine its percentile ranking based on the information provided by SNL. Only those plants that were included in the data provided by SNL in each of the years of the Performance Period will be considered. (7) The Company’s percentile ranking during the Performance Period for each Performance Metric will be the average of the Company’s percentile ranking for each Performance Metric during each of the three years of the Performance Period (each, an “Average Performance Metric”); provided, however, that if the third year of a Performance Metric is not calculable by December 15 of the following year, the Performance Metric shall consist of the three most recent years for which such Performance Metric is calculable. The Company’s “Average Performance,” for purposes of determining any Base Grant adjustments pursuant to Subsection 5(b) above will be the average of the Average Performance Metrics. If only quartile, rather than percentile, rankings are available for a particular Performance Metric, the Average Performance Metric for any such Performance Metric shall be expressed as a percentile. For example, if the Performance Metric was in the top quartile for two Performance Periods and in the lowest quartile in the other Performance Period, the average of these quartiles would be 3 (the average of 4, 4, and 1) and the Average Performance Metric would be the 75th percentile (3 /4). The calculations in this Subsection 6(a)(7) will be verified by the Company’s internal auditors. (8) If either EEI or SNL discontinues providing the data specified above, the Committee shall select a data source that, in the Committee’s judgment, will provide data most comparable to the data provided by EEI or SNL, as the case may be. If the JD Power Residential National Large Segment Survey for investor-owned utilities (or a successor JD Power survey) is not available during each of the years of the Performance Period, the Performance Metric associated with the JD Power Residential Survey (Subsection 6(a)(1)) will be disregarded and not included in the Company’s Average Performance for purposes of determining any Base Grant adjustments pursuant to Subsection 5(b).

  • EBITDA The term “EBITDA” shall mean, with respect to any fiscal period, “Consolidated EBITDA” as defined in the Credit Agreement, provided that the following should also be excluded from the calculation of EBITDA to the extent not already excluded from the calculation of Consolidated EBITDA under the Credit Agreement: (i) Non-Cash Charges (as defined in the Credit Agreement) related to any issuances of equity securities; (ii) fees and expenses relating to the Acquisition; (iii) financing fees (both cash and non-cash) relating to the Acquisition; (iv) covenant-not-to-compete payments to certain members of the Company’s senior management and related expenses; (v) expenses (or any portion thereof) incurred outside of the ordinary course of business that are approved by the Board which the Board determines in its good faith discretion are in the best interest of the Company but which will have a disproportionately adverse impact on the Company’s short term financial performance, affecting the Company’s ability to achieve financial targets related to the vesting of the Class C Units under the Incentive Unit Subscription Agreements or the Company’s annual bonus plan; (vi) costs and expenses incurred in connection with evaluating and consummating acquisitions not contemplated by the Company’s annual plan, as such plan is approved by the Board in good faith; (vii) related party expenditures that are subject to the prior written consent of the Majority Executives pursuant to Section 2.3(a) of the Securityholders Agreement but have failed to receive such consent; (viii) advisors’ fees and expenses incurred outside the ordinary course of business related solely to Vestar’s activities that are unrelated to the Company; (ix) costs associated with any put option or call option contemplated by any Rollover Subscription Agreement or Incentive Unit Subscription Agreement; (x) costs associated with any proposed initial Public Offering or Sale of the Company (as such terms are defined in the Securityholders Agreement); (xi) expenses related to any litigation arising from the Acquisition; (x) management fees and costs related to the activities giving rise to such fees that are paid to, paid for or reimbursed to Vestar and its Affiliates; and (xii) material expenditures or incremental expenditures inconsistent with prior practice (to the extent that prior practice is relevant) required by Board (where Management Managers (as defined in the Securityholders Agreement) unanimously dissent) unless such expenditures are reasonably likely to result in any benefit (whether economic or non-economic) to the Company as determined by the Board in its good faith discretion.

  • Performance Measure Grantee will adhere to the performance measures requirements documented in

  • Ongoing Performance Measures The Department intends to use performance-reporting tools in order to measure the performance of Contractor(s). These tools will include the Contractor Performance Survey (Exhibit G), to be completed by Customers on a quarterly basis. Such measures will allow the Department to better track Vendor performance through the term of the Contract(s) and ensure that Contractor(s) consistently provide quality services to the State and its Customers. The Department reserves the right to modify the Contractor Performance Survey document and introduce additional performance-reporting tools as they are developed, including online tools (e.g. tools within MFMP or on the Department's website).

  • Performance Measurement The Uniform Guidance requires completion of OMB-approved standard information collection forms (the PPR). The form focuses on outcomes, as related to the Federal Award Performance Goals that awarding Federal agencies are required to detail in the Awards.

  • Performance Targets Threshold, target and maximum performance levels for each performance measure of the performance period are contained in Appendix B.

  • Annual Performance Evaluation On either a fiscal year or calendar year basis, (consistently applied from year to year), the Bank shall conduct an annual evaluation of Executive’s performance. The annual performance evaluation proceedings shall be included in the minutes of the Board meeting that next follows such annual performance review.

  • Metrics Institutional Metrics System-Wide Metrics

  • Minimum EBITDA Section 9.23(c) of the Loan Agreement is hereby deleted in its entirety and replaced with the following:

  • Financial Performance Covenants Notwithstanding anything to the contrary contained in Section 7.01, in the event that the U.S. Borrower fails to comply with the requirements of any Financial Performance Covenant, until the expiration of the 10th day subsequent to the date the certificate calculating such Financial Performance Covenant is required to be delivered pursuant to Section 5.04(c), Holdings shall have the right to issue Permitted Cure Securities for cash or otherwise receive cash contributions to the capital of Holdings, and, in each case, to contribute any such cash to the capital of Intermediate Holdings (which shall contribute all such cash to the capital of the U.S. Borrower) (collectively, the "Cure Right"), and upon the receipt by U.S. Borrower of such cash (the "Cure Amount") pursuant to the exercise by Holdings of such Cure Right such Financial Performance Covenant shall be recalculated giving effect to the following pro forma adjustments: (i) EBITDA shall be increased, solely for the purpose of measuring the Financial Performance Covenants and not for any other purpose under this Agreement, by an amount equal to the Cure Amount; and (ii) If, after giving effect to the foregoing recalculations, the U.S. Borrower shall then be in compliance with the requirements of all Financial Performance Covenants, the U.S. Borrower shall be deemed to have satisfied the requirements of the Financial Performance Covenants as of the relevant date of determination with the same effect as though there had been no failure to comply therewith at such date, and the applicable breach or default of the Financial Performance Covenants that had occurred shall be deemed cured for this purposes of the Agreement.