REVIEW AND AMENDMENTS. (1) The implementation of this Agreement will be subject to peri- odic reviews at times arranged between the Parties.
(2) Any amendment agreed to by the Parties will be in writing and will form part of this Agreement. Such amendment shall come into effect on the date determined by the Parties.
REVIEW AND AMENDMENTS. 17.1. This Agreement shall be amended and/or restated by the Parties, as and when required by the Authority in accordance with law.
17.2. Subject to Clause 17.1, any amendment to this Agreement shall only be valid if any such amendment is made in writing and agreed by the Parties.
17.3. A Party may seek to amend this Agreement by serving on the other Party a review notice if:
(a) Either Party’s License is materially modified (whether by amendment or replacement); or
(b) a material change occurs in the law or regulations; or (c) this Interconnection Agreement makes express provision for a review or the Parties agree in writing that there should be a review; or
REVIEW AND AMENDMENTS. 6.1 CTC reserves the right to review and amend if necessary the forgoing rules and regulations at any time.
REVIEW AND AMENDMENTS. 4.1 The Parties will have a working relationship that allows regular liaison and discussion about the way in which the Agreement is developing and working. Development of the relationship will be managed through regular meetings and two-way relationships between the officers and staff of the Parties’ organisations. This Agreement and the manner in which the Parties are fulfilling their obligations may be more formally reviewed at the discretion of either or both Parties.
4.2 To be effective any amendments or alterations to this Agreement will be recorded in writing and signed by the Parties.
REVIEW AND AMENDMENTS. Once the ESM Agreement is considered “final” there will continue to be community of faith and judicatory review every three to five years thereafter, to ensure that it satisfactorily represents the mission and purpose of the ecumenical community of faith and its primary participating denominations. At any time, small changes may be made and tested on a trial basis. Proposals for significant changes must be submitted to the community of faith and both judicatories for approval. A review may be initiated at any time by one of 1) a motion from the NUASM Board,
REVIEW AND AMENDMENTS. The Parties will jointly review the MOU annually and more frequently when: laws or regulations are amended that significantly impact the MOU or when a Party requests a formal change. Any proposed amendment or modification to the MOU shall be submitted to the other Party at least thirty days prior to formal discussion or negotiation. All Parties must concur on any amendments.
REVIEW AND AMENDMENTS. 1. The Authorities may consult to review the functioning and effectiveness of the cooperation arrangements with a view to, inter alia, altering the scope or operation of the arrangements under the MOU.
2. This MOU may be amended with the written consent of all the Authorities.
3. An Authority may propose in writing to each of the other Authorities to amend any of the details in Appendix A. Any such proposed amendment will take effect once each of the other Authorities has provided their written consent.
4. An Authority may amend any of the contact details in Appendix B by providing written notice to each of the other Authorities. The amendment does not require the Authorities to give their written consent or sign an amended MOU.
REVIEW AND AMENDMENTS. 1. The Customs Committee may review the provisions of this Protocol, Annex II and Chapter 3 (Customs and Trade Facilitation), and discuss the necessary amendments on request of one of the Parties. While discussing those amendments, the Customs Committee shall take into account the development of technologies, production processes, price fluctuations and all other factors, which might justify the changes to the rules of origin.
2. Annex II will be adapted in accordance with the periodical changes to the HS.
3. Amendments determined by the Customs Committee after discussion according to paragraphs 1 and 2 shall be reported to the Joint Committee for final decision.
REVIEW AND AMENDMENTS. Both parties agree that despite extensive research and outreach to a national network of small liberal arts colleges and a West Coast network of private colleges and universities, neither the AAMC nor the College has been able to identify any school whose alumni association fundraises on its own behalf or separately for purposes of making gifts to its respective school. This absence of any comparable or instructive models requires particularly thoughtful, collaborative planning and regular review of the points above. Hence, the College and the AAMC will jointly monitor the effects of fundraising operations on the amount of philanthropic support coming to the College as well as the costs of AAMC communications supported by the College. Both parties agree to amend this agreement as needed to utilize alternate fundraising and communications strategies and ensure optimal philanthropic support of the College. This document and any provisions therein may be amended as necessary upon review and in order to attain mutual goals. Any amendment to this agreement must be in a written document signed by both parties.
REVIEW AND AMENDMENTS. The Tasking Agreement should be reviewed annually or earlier if required. Any amendments should be notified to MGS HQ as soon as possible but no later than 1st March each year. No local amendments are to be made to this document.
