Selection and Award Process Sample Clauses

Selection and Award Process. Preliminary Review and Acceptance of Proposal The purpose of the preliminary evaluation is to determine if each proposal is sufficiently responsive to the GFO Announcement to permit a complete evaluation. Proposals must comply with the instructions to vendors contained in this GFO Announcement. Failure to comply with the instructions may cause the proposal to be rejected without further consideration. The state reserves the right to waive any minor irregularities in the proposal. Evaluation Criteria Proposals will be scored using the following criteria: GFO Section Points Program Design and Methodology 15 Goals, Objectives, and Performance Expectations 20 Reporting, Performance Measurement and Quality Improvement 15 Work Plan 15 Organizational Experience and Capacity 15 Project Budget 20 Total 100 Method of Award Proposals accepted through the preliminary review process will be evaluated by a committee and scored against established evaluation criteria. Scores will be given in accordance with the points referenced in section 6.2. Award(s) will be made on the basis of the highest point score received by a responsive, responsible Vendor. This funding opportunity is through a grant award process and as such is not subject to Wis. Stat. ch.16, Subchapter IV. For this reason, the Wis. Stat. ch, 16, Subchapter IV appeals process is not included as part of this GFO process.
Sample 1
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Selection and Award Process. 1Preliminary Evaluation The purpose of the preliminary evaluation is to determine if each proposal is sufficiently responsive to the RFA to permit a complete evaluation. Proposals must comply with the instructions given to the Proposers contained in this RFA. Failure to comply with the instructions may cause the proposal to be rejected without further consideration. The State reserves the right to waive any minor irregularities in the proposal.
Sample 1
Selection and Award Process. The proposals are individually scored by the Selection Committees. The reviewers’ scores are then ranked according to the individual scores, with the highest score given a ranking value of one. The rankings are then determined. The lowest numerical rankings will be used to determine the successful term contract Contractors. In the event of a tie in the ranking totals, the raw scores of the proposers who are tied will be totaled to determine the final order. The numerical rankings will be used to establish the rotation sequence for individual project award. The Proposers ranked 1, 2 and 3 will be asked to enter into a term contract with the CBJ. Proposal evaluation results are anticipated to be announced within 15 calendar days of the submission date, although all offers must be complete and irrevocable for 60 days following the submission date. Award of a term contract, if made, will be to the responsible proposers selected in accordance with the criteria described in SECTION 4 of this RFP. The CBJ reserves the right to award term contracts solely on the basis of written proposals and reserves the right to award term contracts to the successful firms without further discussion.
Sample 1
Selection and Award Process 
Sample 1Sample 2

Related to Selection and Award Process

  • Award Procedures 8.1. The Award Procedures may be invoked by any Framework Public Body and Call-off Contracts may be entered into at any time during the period of the Framework Agreement. 8.2. But the Award Procedures may not be invoked and Call-off Contracts may not be entered into with the Contractor if: 8.2.1. the period of the Framework Agreement has expired; 8.2.2. the Contractor’s interest in the Framework Agreement has been terminated; or 8.2.3. the Contractor’s appointment to provide Services to Framework Public Bodies has been suspended in accordance with clause 9.2 (Management Arrangements). 8.3. The Framework Public Bodies and the Contractor must comply with the Award Procedures and must establish each Call-off Contract without amendment to the Standard Terms of Supply. 8.4. The Contractor must maintain the capacity to enter into and perform Call-off Contracts throughout the period of the Framework Agreement.

  • AWARD PROCEDURE 1.1 If the Authority or any Other Contracting Body decides to source the Goods and/or Services through this Framework Agreement then it will award its Goods and/or Services Requirements in accordance with the procedure in this Framework Schedule 5 (Call Off Procedure) and the requirements of the Regulations and the Guidance. For the purposes of this Framework Schedule 5, “Guidance” shall mean any guidance issued or updated by the UK Government from time to time in relation to the Regulations.

  • METHOD OF AWARD AND PROCEDURE FOR AWARDING A SOW AGREEMENT 5.1. Contractor selection, or the determination to terminate the SOW-RFP without award, shall be done in the best interest of the State.

  • BID EVALUATION AND AWARD 13.1 The electronic signature shall be considered an offer on the part of the Bidder. Such offer shall be deemed accepted upon issuance by the Owners of purchase orders, contract award notifications, or other contract documents appropriate to the work. 13.2 No bid shall be modified or withdrawn for a period of ninety (90) calendar days after the time and date established for receiving bids, and each Bidder so agrees in submitting the bid. 13.3 In case of a discrepancy between the unit prices and their extensions, the unit prices shall govern. 13.4 The bid will be awarded to the lowest responsible, responsive Bidder whose bid will be most advantageous to the Owners, and as the Owners deem will best serve the requirements and interests of the Owners. 13.5 The Owners reserves the right to accept or reject any or all bids; to request rebids; to award bids item-by-item, with or without alternates, by groups, or "lump sum"; to waive minor irregularities in bids; such as shall best serve the requirements and interests of the Owners. 13.6 In order to determine if the Bidder has the experience, qualifications, resources and necessary attributes to provide the quality workmanship, materials and management required by the plans and specifications, the Bidder may be required to complete and submit additional information as deemed necessary by the Owners. Failure to provide the information requested to make this determination may be grounds for a declaration of non-responsive with respect to the Bidder. 13.7 The Owners reserves the right to reject irregular bids that contain unauthorized additions, conditions, alternate bids, or irregularities that make the Bid Proposal incomplete, indefinite or ambiguous. 13.8 Any governmental agency may piggyback on any contract entered into from this bid.

  • Reporting Subawards and Executive Compensation a. Reporting of first-tier subawards.

  • Board Procedure The Arbitrator may determine their own procedure in accordance with the Labour Relations Code and will give full opportunity to all parties to present evidence and make representations. They will hear and determine the difference or allegation and will make every effort to render a decision within 30 days of their first meeting.

  • Bonus Programs Employee may participate in any incentive program which may be made available from time to time to Corporation’s employees at Employee’s level; provided, however, that Employee’s participation is subject to the applicable terms, conditions and eligibility requirements of the program, as they may exist from time to time.

  • System for Award Management (XXX) Requirement Alongside a signed copy of this Agreement, Grantee will provide Florida Housing with a XXX.xxx proof of registration and Commercial and Government Entity (CAGE) number. Grantee will continue to maintain an active XXX registration with current information at all times during which it has an active award under this Agreement.

  • Service Awards The County shall continue its present policy with respect to service awards including time off; provided, however, that the type of award given shall be at the sole discretion of the County. The following procedures shall apply with respect to service awards:

  • Discretionary Nature of Plan The Plan is discretionary and may be amended, cancelled or terminated by the Company at any time, in its discretion. The grant of the Option in this Agreement does not create any contractual right or other right to receive any Options or other Awards in the future. Future Awards, if any, will be at the sole discretion of the Company. Any amendment, modification, or termination of the Plan shall not constitute a change or impairment of the terms and conditions of the Participant’s employment with the Company.

Draft better contracts in just 5 minutes Get the weekly Law Insider newsletter packed with expert videos, webinars, ebooks, and more!