Selection and Award Process. Preliminary Review and Acceptance of Proposal The purpose of the preliminary evaluation is to determine if each proposal is sufficiently responsive to the GFO Announcement to permit a complete evaluation. Proposals must comply with the instructions to vendors contained in this GFO Announcement. Failure to comply with the instructions may cause the proposal to be rejected without further consideration. The state reserves the right to waive any minor irregularities in the proposal. Evaluation Criteria Proposals will be scored using the following criteria: GFO Section Points Program Design and Methodology 15 Goals, Objectives, and Performance Expectations 20 Reporting, Performance Measurement and Quality Improvement 15 Work Plan 15 Organizational Experience and Capacity 15 Project Budget 20 Total 100 Method of Award Proposals accepted through the preliminary review process will be evaluated by a committee and scored against established evaluation criteria. Scores will be given in accordance with the points referenced in section 6.2. Award(s) will be made on the basis of the highest point score received by a responsive, responsible Vendor. This funding opportunity is through a grant award process and as such is not subject to Wis. Stat. ch.16, Subchapter IV. For this reason, the Wis. Stat. ch, 16, Subchapter IV appeals process is not included as part of this GFO process.
Selection and Award Process. 3.1Preliminary Evaluation The purpose of the preliminary evaluation is to determine if each proposal is sufficiently responsive to the RFA to permit a complete evaluation. Proposals must comply with the instructions given to the Proposers contained in this RFA. Failure to comply with the instructions may cause the proposal to be rejected without further consideration. The State reserves the right to waive any minor irregularities in the proposal.
Selection and Award Process. The proposals are individually scored by the Selection Committees. The reviewers’ scores are then ranked according to the individual scores, with the highest score given a ranking value of one. The rankings are then determined. The lowest numerical rankings will be used to determine the successful term contract Contractors. In the event of a tie in the ranking totals, the raw scores of the proposers who are tied will be totaled to determine the final order. The numerical rankings will be used to establish the rotation sequence for individual project award. The Proposers ranked 1, 2 and 3 will be asked to enter into a term contract with the CBJ. Proposal evaluation results are anticipated to be announced within 15 calendar days of the submission date, although all offers must be complete and irrevocable for 60 days following the submission date. Award of a term contract, if made, will be to the responsible proposers selected in accordance with the criteria described in SECTION 4 of this RFP. The CBJ reserves the right to award term contracts solely on the basis of written proposals and reserves the right to award term contracts to the successful firms without further discussion.
Selection and Award Process
