Student Growth Impact Rating. Embedded in the instructional framework are five (5) components designated as student growth components. These components are embedded in criteria as SG 3.1, SG 3.2, SG 6.1, SG 6.2, and SG
8.1. Evaluators add up the raw score on these components and the employee is given a score of low, average, or high based on the scores below. Upon completion of the overall summative scoring process, the evaluator will combine only the student growth rubric scores to assess the classroom teacher’s student growth impact rating. The following scoring band will be used to determine the student growth impact rating. Low Average High
Student Growth Impact Rating. Embedded in the State Criteria are five (5) student growth requirements. These requirements are SG 3.1, SG 3.2, SG 6.1, SG 6.2, and SG 8.1. Employees will be placed into summative rating categories based on the OSPI approved student growth impact scoring bands shown below. An employee who receives a 4, Distinguished, preliminary summative score and a Low student growth impact rating score will receive an overall 3, Proficient rating. 5-12 13-17 18-20 Low Average High
Student Growth Impact Rating. TEACHERS
Student Growth Impact Rating. 20 21 Embedded in the instructional framework are five (5) components designated as 22 student growth components. These components are embedded in criteria as XX 0.0, 00 XX 0.0, XX 6.1, SG 6.2, and SG 8.1. Evaluators add up the raw score on these 24 components and the employee is given a score of low, average, or high based on the 25 scores below. 27 Upon completion of the overall summative scoring process, the evaluator will 28 combine only the student growth rubric scores to assess the classroom teacher’s 29 student growth impact rating. 30 31 The following scoring band will be used to determine the student growth impact 32 rating. 33 5 – 12 13 – 17 18 – 20 Low Average High 34
Student Growth Impact Rating. The sum of all five student growth components from 30 student growth criteria 3, 6, and 8, used in the Comprehensive evaluation. 31
Student Growth Impact Rating. A. Upon completing the overall summative scoring process, the evaluator will combine only the student growth rubric scores to assess the student growth impact rating.
B. The evaluator will determine the student growth impact according to OSPI’s student impact rating scoring band. A student growth score of ‘1’ in any of the rubric rows will result in an overall low student growth impact rating.
C. The evaluators will analyze the student growth score in light of the overall summative score and determine the outcomes.
Student Growth Impact Rating. Embedded in the instructional framework are five (5) components designated as student growth components. These components are embedded in criteria as SG 3.1, SG 3.2, SG 6.1, SG 6.2, and SG 8.1. Employees will be placed into summative rating categories based on the OSPI approved student growth impact scoring bands shown below. An employee who receives a 4, Distinguished, preliminary summative score and a Low student growth impact rating score will receive an overall 3, Proficient rating. If an employee receives a Low student growth score, the employee and evaluator will mutually select and engage in one of the student growth inquiries required by law. 5-12 13-17 18-20
