Summary of Joint Programming Process Sample Clauses

Summary of Joint Programming Process. The process of elaborating the IPA Cross-border Programme between Croatia and Bosnia & Herzegovina started on 22 December 2006 with the first bilateral meeting between the representatives of the national institutions responsible for the IPA component II. At that meeting the process of programme elaboration was discussed and agreed between the two sides. The first meeting of the Joint Programming Committee (JPC) was held on 22 March 2007. This meeting approved the JPC membership, adopted rules of procedure, and approved the mandate and mem- bership of the Joint Drafting Team (JDT). The 2 joint structures so created have the following descriptions and tasks:
Sample 1
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Summary of Joint Programming Process. The programming process started on 19th of February 2007 with the first preparatory meeting of the national institutions responsible for the IPA component II, during which the process of programme elaboration was discussed and agreed between the two sides. The process was lead by two bodies established for that purpose and with specific responsibilities: the Joint Programming Committee (JPC) and the Joint Drafting Team (JDT). The first meeting of the Joint Programming Committee (JPC) was held on 1st of March 2007 in Zagreb when that Committee and Joint Drafting Team were officially established (the composition of the JPC, JDT and partnership groups is given in Annex I.) and during which their rules of procedure, mandate and membership were adopted. The 2 joint structures so created have the following descriptions and tasks: The Joint Programming Committee (JPC) is a joint decision-ma- king body established at the beginning of the programming process, whose mandate lasts from the beginning of the programming pro- cess until final submission of the JPD to the European Commission. JPC consists of representatives from national authorities in charge of IPA component II and regional authorities from the bordering regi- ons eligible for participation in the Programme. Members are nomi- nated and authorised by respective institutions and were approved at 1st PC Joint Programming Committee Main tasks of JPC: ■ Confirm members of the JPC once they are nominated by each country ■ Agree on working procedures of the JPC (adoption of Rules of Procedure) manjak znanja i kapaciteta za izradu i upravljanje projektima te da su lokalni dionici imali poteškoća u pronalaženju partnera s druge strane granice. Može se zaključiti da županije koje graniče sa državama članicama imaju više kapaciteta za i više iskustva u prekograničnoj suradnji od županija koje graniče sa državama ne-članicama, čije je iskustvo xxx uvijek minimalno ili uopće ne postoji. Unutar dosadašnjih progra- ma, korisnici projekata uglavnom su se susretali s projektima manje veličine. Relativno veća dodjela potpora, xxxx xx biti dostupna pod programima prekogranične suradnje IPA-e, predstavljat će stvarni iza- zov za mnoge lokalne dionike xxxx je fiskalni kapacitet xxx uvijek mali. U smislu kapaciteta za pripremu i upravljanje prekograničnim pro- jektima, situacija u Crnoj Gori poprilično je slična opisanoj situaciji u Hrvatskoj. Osim toga, do 2006. Crnih Gora xx xxxx u državnoj za- jednici sa Srbijom te xx xxx...
Sample 1

Related to Summary of Joint Programming Process

  • Joint Network Implementation and Grooming Process Upon request of either Party, the Parties shall jointly develop an implementation and grooming process (the “Joint Grooming Process” or “Joint Process”) which may define and detail, inter alia:

  • Benchmarking Process 2.2.1 The Supplier shall produce and send to the Authority for Approval, a draft plan for the Benchmark Review.

  • Bidding Process 3.1. Bidding shall generally commence based on the sequence of the lot being shown on the PAH Website. However the Auctioneer has the right to vary the sequence without having to give prior notice to the intended bidders.

  • Purchase Order Flip via Ariba Network (AN) The online process allows suppliers to submit invoices via the AN for catalog and non- catalog goods and services. Contractors have the ability to create an invoice directly from their Inbox in their AN account by simply “flipping” the purchase order into an invoice. This option does not require any special software or technical capabilities. For the purposes of this section, the Contractor warrants and represents that it is authorized and empowered to and hereby grants the State and the third-party provider of MFMP the right and license to use, reproduce, transmit, distribute, and publicly display within the system the information outlined above. In addition, the Contractor warrants and represents that it is authorized and empowered to and hereby grants the State and the third-party provider the right and license to reproduce and display within the system the Contractor’s trademarks, system marks, logos, trade dress, or other branding designation that identifies the products made available by the Contractor under the Contract.

  • Hiring Process i. School District and Teach For America will collaborate in good faith to facilitate the efficient hiring of individual Teachers, in accordance with the School District’s established District hiring practices.

  • Signaling protocol The Parties will interconnect their networks using SS7 signaling where Technically Feasible and available as defined in GR 905 Telcordia Standards including ISDN User Part (ISUP) for trunk signaling and TCAP for CCS-based features in the Interconnection of their networks. All Network Operations Forum (NOF) adopted standards shall be adhered to. Where available, CenturyLink signaling services to link its Signaling Transfer Points (STPs) for CLEC switches which connect to CenturyLink’s STPs via “A” links or for CLEC’s STPs to connect to CenturyLink’s STPs via “D” links which are dedicated to the transport of signaling for local Interconnection, may be ordered from the CenturyLink Tariff.

  • Software Use Case Red Hat Enterprise Linux Developer Suite Subscription Services for Red Hat Enterprise Linux Developer Suite are available for Development Purposes only.

  • Technical Specifications The Technical Specifications furnished on the CD are intended to establish the standards for quality, performance and technical requirements for all labor, workmanship, material, methods and equipment necessary to complete the Work. When specifications and drawings are provided or referenced by the County, these are to be considered part of the Scope of Work, and to be specifically documented in the Detailed Scope of Work. For convenience, the County supplied specifications, if any, and the Technical Specifications furnished on the CD.

  • Statement of Work The Contractor shall provide the services and staff, and otherwise do all things necessary for or incidental to the performance of work, as set forth below:

  • Specification and Service Levels The Specification sets out the Services that the Contractor has undertaken to provide. The Specification includes Service Levels setting out particular levels of service that the Contractor has undertaken to meet.

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.