Synopsis of Our Solution Sample Clauses

Synopsis of Our Solution. Following the time-tested notion of reducing randomized Byzantine Agreement to the problem of flipping a global bounded-bias coin, we concentrate our attention to designing such a protocol. As pointed out earlier, standard techniques (due to Xxxxx [21] and Dwork et al. [11]) show how to get a BA protocol with a constant-round overhead, given a common-coin protocol. The “immediately obvious” approach is to use the collective coin-flipping protocols of Feige [12] or Xxxxxxx and Xxxxxxxxx [22]. However, we cannot use these protocols as such, because they work under the assumption that there exists a broadcast channel, which we cannot assume. log n Nevertheless, our protocol borrows ideas from the collective coin-flipping protocol of Feige [12]. Feige’s protocol for collective coin-flipping works as follows: All the players are alive in the beginning of the protocol. In the first round, the players throw a ball each at random into one of O( n ) bins. The players who threw their balls into the lightest bin survive for the next round. The protocol is then recursively invoked on the O(log n) players in the lightest bin. The crucial idea is that, assuming that the good players throw their balls randomly, their balls are almost uniformly distributed among the bins. Thus, the lightest bin contains approximately the right fraction of good players. Therefore, this protocol can be viewed as a way of electing a small subset (a “committee”) of the n players, that contains a “large enough” fraction of good players. After log∗ n recursive invocations of this process, a leader is elected. We let the leader flip a coin, and broadcast it. Note that each step of this protocol assumes that the players broadcast their choices of the bins to all the players. Since we do not have a broadcast channel, we have to implement it, and that requires Byzantine Agreement. It looks like we are back to the same problem. The trick to avoid this circularity is to use a certain weak version of broadcast (called graded broadcast) to implement the first stage of Feige’s protocol. We then proceed to show that this reduces BA among n players to BA among O(log n) players. Thus, assuming that we can implement graded broadcast in O(1) rounds, we get an O(log n) round BA protocol. Notations. Letters such as P, S denote protocols. We usually denote subprotocols of a protocol P by subscripts, such as Pi, and subprotocols of Pi by superscripts, such as Pj . Players are denoted by the letter P , possibly w...
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs

Related to Synopsis of Our Solution

  • Synopsis The agreement authorizes

  • Study An application for leave of absence for professional study must be supported by a written statement indicating what study or research is to be undertaken, or, if applicable, what subjects are to be studied and at what institutions.

  • The Study 1The parties must comply with, and conduct the Study in accordance with, the Protocol and any conditions of the Reviewing HREC. In addition the parties must comply with the following, as applicable:

  • Protocol The attached Protocol shall be an integral part of this Agreement.

  • Random Testing Notwithstanding any provisions of the Collective Agreement or any special agreements appended thereto, section 4.6 of the Canadian Model will not be applied by agreement. If applied to a worker dispatched by the Union, it will be applied or deemed to be applied unilaterally by the Employer. The Union retains the right to grieve the legality of any imposition of random testing in accordance with the Grievance Procedure set out in this Collective Agreement.

  • Diagnostic Assessment 6.3.1 Boards shall provide a list of pre-approved assessment tools consistent with their Board improvement plan for student achievement and which is compliant with Ministry of Education PPM (PPM 155: Diagnostic Assessment in Support of Student Learning, date of issue January 7, 2013). 6.3.2 Teachers shall use their professional judgment to determine which assessment and/or evaluation tool(s) from the Board list of preapproved assessment tools is applicable, for which student(s), as well as the frequency and timing of the tool. In order to inform their instruction, teachers must utilize diagnostic assessment during the school year.

  • Study Population ‌ Infants who underwent creation of an enterostomy receiving postoperative care and awaiting enterostomy closure: to be assessed for eligibility: n = 201 to be assigned to the study: n = 106 to be analysed: n = 106 Duration of intervention per patient of the intervention group: 6 weeks between enterostomy creation and enterostomy closure Follow-up per patient: 3 months, 6 months and 12 months post enterostomy closure, following enterostomy closure (12-month follow-up only applicable for patients that are recruited early enough to complete this follow-up within the 48 month of overall study duration).

  • Laboratory Testing All laboratories selected by UPS Freight for analyzing Controlled Substances Testing will be HHS certified.

  • Risk Analysis The Custodian will provide the Fund with a Risk Analysis with respect to Securities Depositories operating in the countries listed in Appendix B. If the Custodian is unable to provide a Risk Analysis with respect to a particular Securities Depository, it will notify the Fund. If a new Securities Depository commences operation in one of the Appendix B countries, the Custodian will provide the Fund with a Risk Analysis in a reasonably practicable time after such Securities Depository becomes operational. If a new country is added to Appendix B, the Custodian will provide the Fund with a Risk Analysis with respect to each Securities Depository in that country within a reasonably practicable time after the addition of the country to Appendix B.

  • Metadata Where the Contractor has or generates metadata as a result of services provided to the Province, where that metadata is personal information, the Contractor will: not use it or disclose it to any other party except where the Agreement otherwise specifies; and remove or destroy individual identifiers, if practicable.

Draft better contracts in just 5 minutes Get the weekly Law Insider newsletter packed with expert videos, webinars, ebooks, and more!