Treatment Options Sample Clauses
The "Treatment Options" clause defines the range of medical or procedural interventions available to a patient or party under an agreement. It typically outlines which treatments are covered, any limitations or exclusions, and the process for selecting or approving specific options, such as requiring prior authorization for certain therapies. This clause ensures that all parties have a clear understanding of what treatments are accessible, thereby preventing disputes and promoting informed decision-making regarding care.
Treatment Options. Our practice may use and disclose your IIHI to inform you of potential treatment options or alternatives.
Treatment Options. Our practice may use and disclose your PHI to inform you of potential treatment options or alternatives.
Treatment Options. 103. Defendants shall fund, develop, recruit and support an array of treatment services to meet class members' needs as identified in their ISP's. The services shall include, but not be limited to: professional assessments; group and individual psychotherapy; psychopharmacological therapy; occupational therapy; recreation therapy; substance abuse counseling; and sexual and physical abuse counseling.
Treatment Options. The following treatment information is based on the option of treating all known infested properties. It is intended as a guideline and may be modified to adapt to local and/or changing situations. At all stages of the program, an assessment will be made as to the probability of success. For example, if GWSS is found to be infesting a very large area or is infesting wide areas of sensitive habitat, the County will immediately consult with the CDFA to determine the preferred course of action.
Treatment Options. InterMed may use and disclose your PHI to inform you ofpotential treatment options or alternatives.
Treatment Options. The plan shall ensure that PCPs inform clients about all treatment options, regardless of cost or whether such services are covered by the plan, and that health care professionals are not prohibited or otherwise restricted from advising clients about their health status, medical care, or treatment regardless of benefit coverage if the professional is acting within his/her scope of practice. This does not require a plan to cover counseling or referral if it objects on moral or religious grounds and makes available information on its policies to clients who are enrolled with the plan, or who may enroll with the plan, within ninety (90) days of a policy change regarding such counseling or referral services.
Treatment Options. Corner Clinic may use and/or disclose your PHI to inform you of various treatment options or programs that may be of benefit to your care.
Treatment Options. Subcontractor shall not prohibit, or otherwise restrict, a health care professional acting within the lawful scope of practice, from advising or advocating on behalf of a Member who is his or her patient, for any information the Wisconsin Medicaid Program Member needs in order to decide among all relevant treatment options.
Treatment Options. Currently, there are a number of intraoperative imaging options available to aid spine surgeons. By far, the most commonly used modality is 2D fluoroscopy. A worldwide survey conducted in 2013 by ▇▇▇▇▇ et al. reported that 78% of surgeons utilize routine fluoroscopy during spine surgery as either a control at the end of a procedure or for active monitoring used throughout the procedure. Two dimensional anterior/posterior (AP) and lateral fluoroscopic views provide reasonable accuracy measurements but also subject the patient and surgeon to additional ionizing radiation exposure and increased operative timing. Computer assisted spine surgery is another imaging modality that has grown popular since its advent in the early 1990’s (▇▇▇▇▇▇ et al.). In computer assisted cases, surgeons are provided with patient specific and real-time three-dimensional (3D) images. Spine navigation systems typically integrate recently acquired pre-operative computer- tomography (CT) images with proprietary software to help orient the surgeon through real- time 3D reconstructed images. Numerous studies have shown a significant reduction in pedicle screw malalignment rates in cases where spine navigation systems are used versus conventional 2D fluoroscopic imaging, thus confirming an increase in accuracy (▇▇▇▇▇ et al, ▇▇▇▇▇ et al, 2012). Despite this reduction in pedicle screw malalignment, spine navigation imaging systems do have inherent drawbacks. As is common in most new technologies, the computer assisted surgery (CAS) systems are more expensive than 2D fluoroscopy. CAS systems also require the use of proprietor specific probes and tools during surgery and, therefore, subject the surgeon to a learning curve that initially may prolong operative times. It was that projected disturbance in workflow that ▇▇▇▇▇ et al. reported as the reason nearly 80% of surgeons did not use CAS more frequently. In an effort to address the growing concerns of current computer assisted spine navigation systems, an emergent technology has been developed that does not require intraoperative ionizing radiation exposure. In addition to sparing the patient and surgeon to radiation exposure, this new spine navigation system, named the Machine-vision Image Guided Surgery (MvIGS) system, is also projected to not increase mean operative. By use of Instant Flash™ registration, localizing reference images are generated in a matter of seconds, as opposed to minutes, and thereby mitigate the disturbance to norma...
Treatment Options. The following treatment information is based on the option oftreating all known infested properties. It is intended as a guideline and may be modified to adapt to local and/or changing situations. At all stages of the program, an assessment will be made as to the probability of success. For example, if GWSS is found to be infesting a very large area or is infesting wide areas of sensitive habitat or residential neighborhoods, the SMCDA will immediately consult with the CDFA and other appropriate entities to solicit input on-suitable response options. After considering this input, the San Mateo County Agricultural Commissioner will determine the preferred course of action. A number of chemical and non-chemical treatment measures may be considered, including release of bio-control agents; however if a decision is made to proceed with treatment, an effective method of eradication will be required for all infested properties.