Undang Hukum Perdata Sample Clauses

Undang Hukum Perdata. Jakarta: Xxxxxxx Xxxxxxxx Indonesia. UU Nomor 13 tentang Ketenagakerjaan
Sample 1Sample 2
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Undang Hukum Perdata. Rineka Cipta, Jakarta. Poerwosutjipto, H.M.N. 1993. Pengertian Pokok Hukum Dagang Indonesia (Jilid 5 Hukum
Sample 1
Undang Hukum Perdata. 11.2. In connection with this Pledge of Shares Agreement, the Company also gives undertaking in favour of the Pledgee and agrees to be bound to the terms and conditions of this Pledge of Shares Agreement in so far as the provisions of this Pledge of Shares Agreement shall relate and affect to the Company.
Sample 1
Undang Hukum Perdata. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika, 2010. Journal Xxxxxx, Xxx. “Kearifan Lokal Masyarakat Suku Dayak Kalimantan Tengah Indonesia.” Seminar Internasional Riksa Bahasa, 2019. xxxx://xxxxxxxxxxx.xxx.xxx/index.php/riksabahasa/article/view/1087. “Dayak Ngaju Customary Fines in Pre-Marriage Agreement to Minimize Divorce in The Perspective of Xxxxxxxx Xxxxxxxx Xxxxxxxx Xx-Buthi | Xxxxxx | El-Mashlahah.” Accessed September 24, 2023. xxxxx://x-xxxxxxx.xxxx- xxxxxxxxxxxx.xx.xx/xxxxx.xxx/xxxxxxxx/xxxxxxx/xxxx/0000. “Dayak Ngaju Traditional Marriage, Central Kalimantan: Concept and Juridical Review | Aditya | Pena Justisia: Media Komunikasi Dan Kajian Hukum.” Accessed August 6, 2023. xxxxx://xxxxxx.xxxxxx.xx.xx/index.php/hk/article/view/2724. “Departemen Pendidikan Dan Kebudayaan Pusat Penelitian Sejarah Dan Budaya, Sejarah Daerah Kalimantan Tengah.” Proyek Penelitian dan Pencatatan Kebudayaan Daerah Departemen Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan, 1978 1977. Xxxxxxxxxxxxx, Xxxxxxxx, Xxxxxx Xxxxx Xxxxx, and Xxxxxxxxxxxx Xxxxxxxxxxxx. “Hukum Hadat Dayak Ngaju: Xxxxx Xxxxx Xxxxawin Di Kalimantan Tengah.” Al Qalam: Jurnal Ilmiah Keagamaan Dan Kemasyarakatan 17, no. 1 (January 30, 2023): 414–32. xxxxx://xxx.xxx/10.35931/aq.v17i1.1576. Xxxxxxx, Xxxxxxx. “Makna Simbolik Perkawinan Adat Dayak Nhaju Di Kota Palangka Raya” No.20 (2020). xxxxx://xxx.xxx/10.33084/anterior.v20il.1546. Xxxxxxxx, Xxxxx. “Tinjauan Yuridis Perjanjian Pra Nikah Dalam Hukum Perdata Di Indonesia.” Skripsi, Universitas Pancasakti Tegal, 2020. xxxx://xxxxxxxxxx.xxxxxxxx.xx.xx/1237/. Xxxxxxxx, Xxxxxx Xxxxx. “Tinjauan Xxxxxxx Xxxxxxxxan Pranikah.” Other, Universitas Wijaya Putra, 2019. xxxx://xxxxxxx.xxx.xx.xx/id/eprint/4212/. Xxxxxx, Xxxxx. “Pelaksanaan Perkawinan Menurut Hukum Adat Dayak Ngaju Ditinjau Dari Hukum Islam.” Jurnal Sagacious 4, no. 2 (June 30, 2018): 63–72. Xxxxxxxx, Xxxxxxxxxx. Singer Dalam Pusaran Perubahan Masyarakat Dayak Ngaju. Kalbar: Lembaga Literasi Dayak, 2016. Xxxxxxxx, Xxxxxxxxxx. “Singer sebagai Ujud Xxxxxx Xxxxx, Damai, dan Keseimbangan di Kalangan Etnis Dayak Ngaju” 2, no. 2 (2017). Xxxxxxx, Xxxxxxx. “Perkawinan Adat Masyarakat Muslim Suku Dayak Ngaju: Sejarah Dan Akulturasi Islam Terhadap Budaya Lokal Di Desa Petak Bahandang.” Undergraduate, IAIN Palangka Raya, 2019. xxxx://xxxxxxx.xxxx-xxxxxxxxxxxx.xx.xx/2188/. Xxxxxxxxx, Xxxxxxxxx. “Kerukunan Antar Umat Beragama Keluarga Suku Dayak Ngaju Di Palangka Raya.” Wawasan: Jurnal Ilmiah Agama Dan Sosial Budaya 3, no. 1 (August 31, 2018): 67–90. xxxxx://xxx...
Sample 1
Undang Hukum Perdata. Jakarta: Xxxxxxx Xxxxxxxx. Xxxxxx, Xxx, and Admiral. (2008). Hukum Keluarga Xxx Perikatan. Pekanbaru: UIR Press. Jurnal Xxxxxxxx, Xxxxxxxxxx. (1992). Hukum Perikatan. Bandung: Citra Xxxxxx Xxxxx. Pradnyaswari, A. A. (2013). “Upaya Hukum Penyelesaian Wanprestasi Dalam Perjanjian Sewa Menyewa Kendaraan (Rent a Car).” Jurnal Advokasi Vol. 3(No. 2). Pranavionita, Vivy. (2013). “Faktor Pendorong Pihak Yang Menyewakan Mobil Melakukan Upaya Penyelesaian Wanprestasi Dalam Perjanjian Sewa Mobil Melalui Pihak Kepolisian.” Jurnal Mahasiswa Fakultas Hukum Universitas Brawijaya. Xxxxxx, Xxxxxx. (2013). “Upaya Perusahaan Rental Untuk Menyelesaikan Wanprestasi Xxx Overmacht Yang Berupa Kerusakan Pada Perjanjian Sewa Menyewa Mobil (Studi Kasus Di Daniswara , Adfan, Nagoya Transport Rent Car YOGYAKARTA).” Jurnal Mahasiswa Fakultas Hukum Universitas Brawijaya. Perundang-Undangan Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Perdata (KUHPerdata) Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Dagang. Undang-Undang Nomor 8 Tahun 1999 tentang Perlindungan Konsumen
Sample 1

Related to Undang Hukum Perdata

  • Xxxxxxxx-Xxxxx; Internal Accounting Controls The Company and the Subsidiaries are in compliance with any and all applicable requirements of the Xxxxxxxx-Xxxxx Act of 2002 that are effective as of the date hereof, and any and all applicable rules and regulations promulgated by the Commission thereunder that are effective as of the date hereof and as of the Closing Date. The Company and the Subsidiaries maintain a system of internal accounting controls sufficient to provide reasonable assurance that: (i) transactions are executed in accordance with management’s general or specific authorizations, (ii) transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP and to maintain asset accountability, (iii) access to assets is permitted only in accordance with management’s general or specific authorization, and (iv) the recorded accountability for assets is compared with the existing assets at reasonable intervals and appropriate action is taken with respect to any differences. The Company and the Subsidiaries have established disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the Company and the Subsidiaries and designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that information required to be disclosed by the Company in the reports it files or submits under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported, within the time periods specified in the Commission’s rules and forms. The Company’s certifying officers have evaluated the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures of the Company and the Subsidiaries as of the end of the period covered by the most recently filed periodic report under the Exchange Act (such date, the “Evaluation Date”). The Company presented in its most recently filed periodic report under the Exchange Act the conclusions of the certifying officers about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on their evaluations as of the Evaluation Date. Since the Evaluation Date, there have been no changes in the internal control over financial reporting (as such term is defined in the Exchange Act) of the Company and its Subsidiaries that have materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the internal control over financial reporting of the Company and its Subsidiaries.

  • Sxxxxxxx-Xxxxx; Internal Accounting Controls The Company and the Subsidiaries are in compliance with any and all applicable requirements of the Sxxxxxxx-Xxxxx Act of 2002 that are effective as of the date hereof, and any and all applicable rules and regulations promulgated by the Commission thereunder that are effective as of the date hereof and as of the Closing Date. The Company and the Subsidiaries maintain a system of internal accounting controls sufficient to provide reasonable assurance that: (i) transactions are executed in accordance with management’s general or specific authorizations, (ii) transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP and to maintain asset accountability, (iii) access to assets is permitted only in accordance with management’s general or specific authorization, and (iv) the recorded accountability for assets is compared with the existing assets at reasonable intervals and appropriate action is taken with respect to any differences. The Company and the Subsidiaries have established disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the Company and the Subsidiaries and designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that information required to be disclosed by the Company in the reports it files or submits under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported, within the time periods specified in the Commission’s rules and forms. The Company’s certifying officers have evaluated the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures of the Company and the Subsidiaries as of the end of the period covered by the most recently filed periodic report under the Exchange Act (such date, the “Evaluation Date”). The Company presented in its most recently filed periodic report under the Exchange Act the conclusions of the certifying officers about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on their evaluations as of the Evaluation Date. Since the Evaluation Date, there have been no changes in the internal control over financial reporting (as such term is defined in the Exchange Act) of the Company and its Subsidiaries that have materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the internal control over financial reporting of the Company and its Subsidiaries.

Draft better contracts in just 5 minutes Get the weekly Law Insider newsletter packed with expert videos, webinars, ebooks, and more!