Common Contracts
4 similar Interconnection, Resale and Unbundling Agreement contracts
INTERCONNECTION, RESALE AND UNBUNDLINGInterconnection, Resale and Unbundling Agreement • June 1st, 2024
The filing of this arbitrated Agreement with the Illinois Commerce Commission in accordance with the Arbitration Decision, dated December 3, 1996 (the “Decision”) of the Illinois Commerce Commission, with respect to AT&T Communications of Illinois, Inc.’s Petition for Arbitration of Interconnection Terms, Conditions and Prices from GTE North Incorporated and GTE South Incorporated, in their respective service areas, 96- AB-005, does not in any way constitute a waiver by either AT&T Communications of Illinois, Inc., GTE North Incorporated or GTE South Incorporated of any right which any such Party may have to appeal to a competent court of law, or to petition the Illinois Commerce Commission for reconsideration of, any determination contained in the Decision, the Hearing Examiner’s Proposed Arbitration Decision, dated November 8, 1996 (the “Proposed Decision”), with respect to the Petition, or any provision included in this Agreement pursuant to the Decision or the Proposed Decision.
INTERCONNECTION, RESALE AND UNBUNDLINGInterconnection, Resale and Unbundling Agreement • May 13th, 2024
The filing of this arbitrated Agreement with the Illinois Commerce Commission in accordance with the Arbitration Decision, dated December 3, 1996 (the “Decision”) of the Illinois Commerce Commission, with respect to AT&T Communications of Illinois, Inc.’s Petition for Arbitration of Interconnection Terms, Conditions and Prices from GTE North Incorporated and GTE South Incorporated, in their respective service areas, 96- AB-005, does not in any way constitute a waiver by either AT&T Communications of Illinois, Inc., GTE North Incorporated or GTE South Incorporated of any right which any such Party may have to appeal to a competent court of law, or to petition the Illinois Commerce Commission for reconsideration of, any determination contained in the Decision, the Hearing Examiner’s Proposed Arbitration Decision, dated November 8, 1996 (the “Proposed Decision”), with respect to the Petition, or any provision included in this Agreement pursuant to the Decision or the Proposed Decision.
INTERCONNECTION, RESALE AND UNBUNDLINGInterconnection, Resale and Unbundling Agreement • September 30th, 2022 • Kentucky
The filing of this arbitrated Agreement with the Public Service Commission of the Commonwealth of Kentucky in accordance with the Order, dated February 14, 1997 (the "Order"), of the Public Service Commission of the Commonwealth of Kentucky with respect to In the Matter of The Petition by AT&T Communications of the South Central States, Inc. for Arbitration of Certain Terms and Conditions of a Proposed Agreement with GTE South Incorporated Concerning Interconnection and Resale Under the Telecommunications Act of 1996, Case No. 96-478, does not in any way constitute a waiver by either AT&T Communications of the South Central States, Inc. or GTE South Incorporated of any right which any such Party may have to appeal to a competent court of law, or to petition the Public Services Commission of the Commonwealth of Kentucky for reconsideration of, any determination contained in the Order, or any provision included in this Agreement pursuant to the Order.
INTERCONNECTION, RESALE AND UNBUNDLINGInterconnection, Resale and Unbundling Agreement • January 30th, 2022 • Kentucky
The filing of this arbitrated Agreement with the Public Service Commission of the Commonwealth of Kentucky in accordance with the Order, dated February 14, 1997 (the "Order"), of the Public Service Commission of the Commonwealth of Kentucky with respect to In the Matter of The Petition by AT&T Communications of the South Central States, Inc. for Arbitration of Certain Terms and Conditions of a Proposed Agreement with GTE South Incorporated Concerning Interconnection and Resale Under the Telecommunications Act of 1996, Case No. 96-478, does not in any way constitute a waiver by either AT&T Communications of the South Central States, Inc. or GTE South Incorporated of any right which any such Party may have to appeal to a competent court of law, or to petition the Public Services Commission of the Commonwealth of Kentucky for reconsideration of, any determination contained in the Order, or any provision included in this Agreement pursuant to the Order.
