FLORIDA NON-SOLICITATION AGREEMENTNon-Solicitation Agreement • December 13th, 2022 • Florida
RECITALSNon-Solicitation Agreement • April 25th, 2006 • KCS Energy Inc • Crude petroleum & natural gas • Texas
RHODE ISLAND NON-SOLICITATION AGREEMENTNon-Solicitation Agreement • November 8th, 2022 • Rhode Island
[RECIPIENT ADDRESS], shall be bound. The Owner and Recipient shall be known separately as a “Party” and together as the “Parties.”
LOUISIANA NON-SOLICITATION AGREEMENTNon-Solicitation Agreement • October 21st, 2022 • Louisiana
DELAWARE NON-SOLICITATION AGREEMENTNon-Solicitation Agreement • October 7th, 2022 • Delaware
VERMONT NON-SOLICITATION AGREEMENTNon-Solicitation Agreement • December 15th, 2022 • Vermont
NON-SOLICITATION AGREEMENTNon-Solicitation Agreement • November 5th, 2018 • Webster Financial Corp • National commercial banks • Connecticut
NON-SOLICITATION AGREEMENT (this "Agreement") by and between Webster Financial Corporation, a Delaware corporation (the "Company"), and Karen Higgins-Carter (the "Executive"), dated as of July 16, 2018 (the "Effective Date").
Non solicitation agreementNon-Solicitation Agreement • December 26th, 2019
The Client has a contract, dated [date] with the Contractor (a copy of which is set out in Schedule 1) ('the Contract’), under which the Contractor [briefly specify the nature of the contract for services] and, in the course of performing the Services, the Contractor [meets and communicates] with the Client's [clients/■ ■ ■ ■ ]. ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■
PENNSYLVANIA NON-SOLICITATION AGREEMENTNon-Solicitation Agreement • November 8th, 2022 • Pennsylvania
[RECIPIENT ADDRESS], shall be bound. The Owner and Recipient shall be known separately as a “Party” and together as the “Parties.”
NON-SOLICITATION AGREEMENT dated as of March 22, 2021 by and between and BANC OF CALIFORNIA, INC.Non-Solicitation Agreement • March 23rd, 2021 • Banc of California, Inc. • National commercial banks • California
This NON-SOLICITATION AGREEMENT (this “Agreement”) is dated as of March 22, 2021, by and between [•] (“Key Person”) and Banc of California, Inc., a Maryland corporation (“Parent”). All capitalized terms used but not defined herein shall have the meanings ascribed to them in the Merger Agreement (as defined below).
Exhibit 99(i)Non-Solicitation Agreement • April 2nd, 1999 • Jwgenesis Financial Corp / • Security brokers, dealers & flotation companies • Florida
NON-SOLICITATION AGREEMENTNon-Solicitation Agreement • September 26th, 2017 • Independence Bancshares, Inc. • National commercial banks • South Carolina
THIS NON-SOLICITATION AGREEMENT (this “Agreement”) is entered into as of September 25, 2017, between First Reliance Bancshares, Inc. (“Parent”), a South Carolina corporation and the holding company of First Reliance Bank (“First Reliance”), and the undersigned Chief Credit Officer (“Executive”) of Independence Bancshares, Inc., a South Carolina corporation (“Independence Bancshares”), and Independence National Bank, a wholly-owned subsidiary of Independence Bancshares (“Independence Bank” and, together with Independence Bancshares, “Independence”), and shall become effective at the Effective Time of the Merger provided in the Merger Agreement (as defined below), between Parent and Independence Bancshares.
NON-SOLICITATION AGREEMENTNon-Solicitation Agreement • December 26th, 2012 • Access Midstream Partners Lp • Natural gas transmission
This Non-Solicitation Agreement (this “Agreement”) is entered into on December 20, 2012 (the “Effective Date”), among Access Midstream Partners, L.P. (“ACMP”) (the “Gatherer”) and Chesapeake Midstream Development, L.L.C. (“CMD”), Chesapeake Operating, Inc., Chesapeake Energy Marketing, Inc. and Chesapeake Energy Corporation (collectively, the “Producers”). The Gatherer and the Producers are referred to herein individually as a “Party” and collectively as the “Parties.”
NON-SOLICITATION AGREEMENTNon-Solicitation Agreement • March 26th, 2007 • Sten Corp • Short-term business credit institutions
This Non-Solicitation Agreement is made and entered into this 20th day of March, 2007 by and between Colfax Financial Corporation, a Utah corporation (“Colfax”) and Flash Motors, Inc., an Arizona corporation (“Flash”).
NORTH DAKOTA NON-SOLICITATION AGREEMENTNon-Solicitation Agreement • November 2nd, 2022 • North Dakota
[RECIPIENT ADDRESS], shall be bound. The Owner and Recipient shall be known separately as a “Party” and together as the “Parties.”
NON-SOLICITATION AGREEMENTNon-Solicitation Agreement • July 9th, 2014 • inContact, Inc. • Services-prepackaged software • Delaware
This Non-Solicitation Agreement (this “Agreement”) is being executed and delivered as of May 6, 2014, by Edison Venture Fund VII, LP (“Stockholder”) in favor and for the benefit of inContact, Inc., a Delaware corporation (together with any of its affiliates and subsidiaries, the “Purchaser”).
NON-SOLICITATION AGREEMENTNon-Solicitation Agreement • February 10th, 2017 • Rich Uncles Real Estate Investment Trust I • Real estate investment trusts
THIS NON-SOLICITATION AGREEMENT (the “Non-Solicitation Agreement”) is entered into as of February 8, 2017 by and between Rich Uncles Real Estate Investment Trust I, (the “Company”) and RICH UNCLES, LLC (“Advisor”) to protect the valuable competitive information and business relationships of Advisor.
Non Solicitation Agreement OntarioNon-Solicitation Agreement • February 5th, 2021
Geographical scope of solicitation agreement partway through that violate our database, investment advisors may be okay to add a valid
NON-SOLICITATION AGREEMENTNon-Solicitation Agreement • February 28th, 2006 • Federal Realty Investment Trust • Real estate investment trusts • Maryland
THIS NON-SOLICITATION AGREEMENT (“Agreement”) is made as of the 27th day of February, 2006 by and between FEDERAL REALTY INVESTMENT TRUST (“Trust”) and MARK S. ORDAN.
June 17, 2011 Brigham Exploration Company 6300 Bridgepoint Parkway Building Two, Suite 500 Austin, Texas 78730 Attention: Eugene B. Shepherd, Jr. Subject: Non-Solicitation Agreement Dear Gene:Non-Solicitation Agreement • October 28th, 2011 • Statoil Asa • Petroleum refining
Statoil Texas Onshore Properties LLC, a Delaware limited liability company (together with its affiliates, “STOP”), has commenced discussions with Brigham Exploration Company, a Delaware corporation (“Target”), regarding the possible acquisition of Target by STOP (the “Proposed Transaction”). Target recognizes that STOP’S continued evaluation, pursuit and negotiation of the Proposed Transaction would require the expenditure of significant additional time, effort and resources, both internal and external, by STOP. STOP has communicated to Target that STOP will not proceed with its evaluation unless Target enters into this letter agreement. In consideration for, among other things, the willingness of STOP to devote such time, effort and resources in connection with the pursuit of the Proposed Transaction, the parties, intending to be legally bound, hereby agree as follows (this “Agreement”):
NON SOLICITATION AGREEMENTNon Solicitation Agreement • May 9th, 2021
Standard non solicitation clauseNon-Solicitation Agreement • October 28th, 2021
A non-stress agreement is a contract that limits an individual (typically an ex-employee) from the stress of the structurerecorporated structurerecorporate refers to the organization of several departments or business units within a company. Depending on the objectives of a company and industry or customers after the employee's departure from a businesscorporating company is a legal entity created by individuals, shareholders or shareholders, with the aim of operating for profit. Corporations are allowed to enter contracts, Sue and be sued, their assets, remit federal and state taxes and borrow money from financial institutions. An unstressed agreement may be in the form of a whole document or a clausease Man Clause key is a contractual clause prohibiting an investment company or fund manager to make new investments if one or more key persons are not available to devote the time necessary to investment. A key man is an important employee or executive who is fundamental to the operation
NON-SOLICITATION AGREEMENTNon-Solicitation Agreement • July 7th, 2017 • Entellus Medical Inc • Surgical & medical instruments & apparatus • Delaware
This Non-Solicitation Agreement is dated as of July 6, 2017 (this “Agreement”), by and between Entellus Medical, Inc., a Delaware corporation (“Parent”) and the undersigned (“Seller”). Parent and Seller are referred to herein as the “Parties”.
Caledon Resources plc (AIM: CDN, ASX: CCD)Non-Solicitation Agreement • April 20th, 2011
On 8 November 2010 the directors of Bidco, GRAM and Caledon announced that an agreement in principle had been reached with GRAM on the terms of a Possible Acquisition of Caledon by Bidco, a wholly owned indirect subsidiary of GRAM.
NORTH DAKOTA NON-SOLICITATION AGREEMENTNon-Solicitation Agreement • August 24th, 2021 • North Dakota
CALIFORNIA NON-SOLICITATION AGREEMENTNon-Solicitation Agreement • October 14th, 2022 • California
This agreement is executed by the Parties in connection with the sale or disposition of all, or of substantially all, the Recipient’s ownership interest in [BUSINESS ENTITY NAME], including its goodwill, as authorized under California law under the following circumstance: (check one)
NON-SOLICITATION AGREEMENTNon-Solicitation Agreement • May 13th, 2022
FORM OF NON-SOLICITATION AGREEMENTNon-Solicitation Agreement • May 9th, 2006 • International Paper Co /New/ • Paper mills
THIS NON-SOLICITATION AGREEMENT (the “Non-Solicitation Agreement”) is entered into by and between International Paper Company (together with its subsidiaries and affiliates, “International Paper”), a New York corporation, and the undersigned employee of International Paper to protect the valuable competitive information and business relationships of International Paper.
NON-SOLICITATION AGREEMENTNon-Solicitation Agreement • March 1st, 2020 • Georgia
This NON-SOLICITATION Agreement (the “Agreement”) is entered into by Nayborlee, LLC with its principal offices at 516 Sosebee Farm Road, Suite 985, Grayson, Georgia 30017 and between (“Contractor”), located at solicitation of services by the Contractor to any customer of Nayborlee, LLC. for the purpose of preventing any
MARSH & MCLENNAN COMPANIES, INC. NON‑SOLICITATION AGREEMENTNon-Solicitation Agreement • February 27th, 2013 • Marsh & McLennan Companies, Inc. • Insurance agents, brokers & service • New York
This Agreement, and the Confidentiality Agreement to be executed simultaneously herewith, is entered into in consideration of the Employee's (a) employment by the Company, (b) participation in any bonus compensation plan of Company, as required under such plan, and (c) Employee's access to Confidential Information and Trade Secrets belonging to Company.
ContractNon-Solicitation Agreement • January 17th, 2003 • Fahnestock Viner Holdings Inc • Security brokers, dealers & flotation companies • New York
THIS NON-SOLICITATION AGREEMENT (this "Agreement") is made as of the 2nd day of January, 2003. Capitalized terms used herein and not defined herein shall have the meanings ascribed to them in that certain Purchase Agreement of even date herewith (the "Purchase Agreement"), by and among Fahnestock Viner Holdings Inc., Fahnestock & Co. Inc., Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce and CIBC World Markets Corp.
Are Non Solicitation Agreements Enforceable In OregonNon-Solicitation Agreement • July 18th, 2021
The amount of the uk with the best interests of purpose: this in oregon are non enforceable in any of the next generation search at the employees who say
NON-SOLICITATION AGREEMENTNon-Solicitation Agreement • January 28th, 2022
For good consideration and in consideration of the employment or continued employment of the Employee by the Company, the Employee and the Company agree as follows:
A Non Solicitation Agreement In CaliforniaNon Solicitation Agreement • May 20th, 2022
Solicitation agreements in browser experience representing clients in a non solicitation agreement is designed for a strong public policy is in their jobs and quick response was very relevant and. See longer than they must be very much detail as if cookies. We are closely monitoring the developments in park area.
NON-SOLICITATION AGREEMENTNon-Solicitation Agreement • November 15th, 2000 • Sandisk Corp • Computer storage devices
THIS NON-SOLICITATION AGREEMENT (this “Agreement”) is made and entered into effective as of August 7, 2000 (the “Effective Date”), by and between SanDisk Corporation, a Delaware corporation (“SanDisk”), DigitalPortal Inc., a Delaware corporation (“DPI”), and Photo-Me International, Plc. (“PMI”), a corporation organized under the laws of England and Wales.
