Alabama Alcoholic Beverage Control Board Licensing and Compliance Division Territorial Agreement FormTerritorial Agreement • November 2nd, 2014
This document is to be filed with the Alabama Alcoholic Beverage Control Board in compliance with Alabama Code Section 28-8-2. This agreement is subject to the provisions of Alabama law including, but not limited to, Alabama Code Title 28, Chapter 8 and also Chapter 9 (pertaining to beer), Title 45, Chapter 2, Part 3 (pertaining to wine in Baldwin County), Alabama Act No. 93-483 (pertaining to wine in Mobile County), Alabama Act No. 2013-346 (pertaining to wine in Jefferson County), Alabama Act No. 2014-209 (pertaining to wine in Shelby County), and Alabama Act No. 2014-223 (pertaining to wine in Montgomery County).
TERRITORIAL AGREEMENTTerritorial Agreement • May 27th, 2022 • Missouri
This Agreement is made and entered into as of the 27th day of May, 2022, by and between UNION ELECTRIC COMPANY d/b/a/ Ameren Missouri ("Company") and CO- MO ELECTRIC COOPERATIVE, INC. ("Cooperative"). Company and Cooperative are sometimes referred to herein singularly as a “Party” and collectively as the “Parties.”
by Dan KnuppTerritorial Agreement • June 19th, 2008
ContractTerritorial Agreement • November 1st, 2020
PSC-92-0570-FOF-EU (Agreement).1 The Agreement was first amended in August 1998 and the amendment was approved by the Commission in Order No. PSC-99-0024-FOF- EU.2Territorial Agreement • April 24th, 2014
This recommendation addresses the parties’ joint petition for approval of the Second Amendment. The Commission has jurisdiction over the matter pursuant to Section 366.04, Florida Statutes (F.S.).
TERRITORIAL AGREEMENTTerritorial Agreement • March 28th, 2008 • Missouri
This Agreement is made and entered into as of the 28th day of March, 2008, by and between UNION ELECTRIC COMPANY d/b/a/ AmerenUE (Company) and PEMISCOT- DUNKLIN ELECTRIC COOPERATIVE, INC. (Cooperative). Company and Cooperative are sometimes referred to herein singularly as a “Party” and collectively as the “Parties.”
TERRITORIAL AGREEMENTTerritorial Agreement • August 18th, 2016
THIS AGREEMENT, made and entered into as of this day of , 2016, by and between the CITY OF NEWBERRY, FLORIDA, a municipal corporation organized and existing under the laws of the State of Florida (hereinafter called “City”) and CLAY ELECTRIC COOPERATIVE, INC., an electric cooperative existing under the laws of the State of Florida (hereinafter called “Clay”), collectively called the “Parties”;
TERRITORIAL AGREEMENTTerritorial Agreement • May 4th, 2021 • Missouri
THIS AGREEMENT is made and entered into as of this 16th day of April,2021,by and between the CITY OF HIGGINSVILLE,MISSOURI,a political subdivision of the 3rd Class organized and existing under the laws of Missouri with its principal office located at 1922 Main Street,,Higginsville, Missouri ("Higginsville") and EVERGY MISSOURI WEST,INC.,an "electrical corporation" and "public utility" as those terms are defined in Mo. Rev. Stat. §
Death 831Territorial Agreement • January 18th, 2024
BEFORE THE PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF MISSOURITerritorial Agreement • October 6th, 2021
In the Matter of the Joint Application of Union Electric Company, d/b/a Ameren Missouri for Order Approving a Letter Agreement Allowing the Transfer of Certain Electric Customers to the Board of Municipal Utilities of the City of Sikeston, Missouri.
BEFORE THE PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF MISSOURITerritorial Agreement • May 19th, 2022
In the Matter of the Joint Application by the ) City of Poplar Bluff, Missouri and Ozark ) Border Electric Cooperative for Approval of ) File No. EO-2022-0264 Minor Modifications and Extension of a ) Territorial Agreement Involving Three Areas ) In Butler County, Missouri )
ContractTerritorial Agreement • June 27th, 2023
of the 1994 Agreement to clarify the Parties’ obligations with respect to the existing phosphate mining customers in PRECO’s service territory.2
ContractTerritorial Agreement • June 1st, 2023
In 1994, the Commission approved a territorial agreement that established service territory boundaries for the Parties in Hardee, Highlands, Polk, and Osceola counties (1994 Agreement).1 The 1994 Agreement contained a provision permitting Duke (formerly Florida Power Corporation) to provide transmission level electric service to certain phosphate mining companies in PRECO’s service territory, because PRECO did not have the appropriate facilities to meet the industrial customers’ service needs. In 2006, the Commission approved an amendment to certain sections of the 1994 Agreement to clarify the Parties’ obligations with respect to the existing phosphate mining customers in PRECO’s service territory.2
BAY AREA DISTRIBUTINGTerritorial Agreement • November 4th, 2005 • Golden West Brewing Company, Inc. • Malt beverages
THIS AGREEMENT MADE AND ENTERED THIS 17TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2000 BY AND BETWEEN BAY AREA DISTRIBUTING CO., INC., A LICENSED BEER WHOLESALES, HEREBY REFERRED TO AS "SUPPLIER" APPOINTS SAID "DISTRIBUTOR", AND BUTTE CREEK HEREBY REFERRED TO AS "SUPPLIER" APPOINTS SAID DISTRIBUTOR THE TERRITORIAL AUTHORIZATION TO DISTRIBUTE THE FOLLOWING BRANDS:
Nunavut: un esfuerzo hacia el entendimiento étnicoTerritorial Agreement • December 10th, 2004
In 1993, the Government of Canada and the Inuit people signed an agreement for the creation of a new territory, called Nunavut, our land. By this, Inuit besides receive 1.1 billion dollars (can.) during 14 years for its administration, but decline any other land claim in Canada. Nunavut Inuit have developing plans of wildlife management and harvesting for them, and they are investing in trusts and enterprises of their own, with federal supporting. Employment is an urgent need for Nunavut. In this paper I argue that Nunavut is a valid opportunity for rescuing hunting and fishing practices in a new context, and that it will improve directly Inuit ethnic essentialism. Canadian government and Inuit demonstrate that ethnic minorities may be owners of their destiny.
ContractTerritorial Agreement • July 31st, 2014
Cooperative, a new territorial agreement between FPL and JEA was approved by the Commission in 1998.3 In 2012 FPL and JEA agreed to an amendment that altered a segment of the territorial boundaries between the parties so that a single utility could serve the electric needs of a new private development planned for an undeveloped area.4
