LIMITATIONS. 2.1 This Legal Opinion is limited to and based on Danish law in force at the date hereof and as applied by the Danish courts. We express no opinion as to the law of any other jurisdiction or the effect thereof, nor have we made any investigation as to any laws other than the laws of Denmark.
LIMITATIONS. Although successfully addressing the research question, the results of this study may have been influenced by several methodological limitations. First, there was a substantial difference in the number of community pharmacy employees (81.4%) compared to hospital pharmacy em- ployees (17.2%) who responded to the survey, as demonstrated in table 1. This imbalance may have influenced the overall satisfaction results and skewed the comparison of job satisfaction between the two professions towards the perspectives of community pharmacy staff. Addition- ally, the smaller percentage of respondents from hospital pharmacy settings could have con- tributed to lower variation in their responses, as reflected by a consistently lower standard de- viations (SD) compared to those from community pharmacies, as demonstrated in table 4. Additionally, relative to the gender distribution in Denmark, the study population had a dispro- portionately larger fraction of women (88.6%) compared to men (11.2%), which limited the generalizability of the results. This could be a limitation since no significant differences in job satisfaction between genders were found, potentially masking any true differences that might exist in a more balanced sample. Furthermore, as described in the methods section, the pilot testing was slightly insufficient, as only the first two questions added to the demographic section were piloted, while the remaining four questions added later, were not individually pilot tested. These were questions regarding profession title, type of employment, amount of weekly working hours, and for hospital em- ployees, whether their daily work included patient specific clinical pharmacy tasks. Rather than pilot testing the four questions individually, they were included in the pilot testing of the full questionnaire. This was a limitation as the added questions were not separately confirmed for clarity and relevance before being distributed to the respondents. Lastly, job satisfaction is essentially subjective and can fluctuate frequently based on individ- uals' emotions and feelings (58). This was a limitation to the study as job satisfaction of the respondents could have been influenced by temporary moods or recent experiences rather than stable, long-term factors (58). This study relied on a cross-sectional survey, which was inade- quate for capturing changes in job satisfaction over time. Consequently, the responses might not accurately reflect reliable levels of jo...