Conflicts definition
Conflicts. To the extent there is a conflict, it is understood and agreed that the specific provisions contained in this Agreement shall prevail over Agency rules, regulations, policies and procedures pertaining to the same subject matter. It is further understood and agreed that in the absence of such conflict, such rules, regulations, policies and procedures remain in full force and effect and applicable to the bargaining unit members.
Conflicts means new or ongoing OHV issues involving agencies, principal, or interested
Conflicts. The Second Party hereby certifies that (1) neither he/she nor any member of his/her immediate family1 is an employee of the University of Louisville or one of its affiliated corporations (“UofL employee”) (2) no officer/managing partner of the Second Party nor any member of the officer’s/managing partner’s immediate family is a UofL employee and (3) no employee of the Second Party performing services for this Agreement nor that employee’s immediate family is a UofL employee . The Second Party further certifies that neither he/she nor any member of his/her immediate family have contributed more than the amount specified in KRS 121.056(2), to the campaign of the gubernatorial candidate elected in the Commonwealth of Kentucky at the election last preceding the date of this Agreement. The undersigned’s authorized signatory for the Second Party further swears under the penalty of perjury, that neither he/she nor the Second Party which he/she represents, has knowingly violated any provisions of the campaign finance laws of the Commonwealth, and that the award of this Agreement to him/her or the Second Party which he/she represents will not violate any provisions of the campaign finance laws of the Commonwealth. Conflicts Policy: This section is applicable and needs to be completed if some funding comes from federal or sponsored projects (If Yes to either question in item 11 below.)
Examples of Conflicts in a sentence
Until such procedure is developed and implemented by ICANN, ICANN will review and consider alleged conflicts between applicable laws and non-‐WHOIS related provisions of this Agreement in a manner similar to ICANN’s Procedure For Handling WHOIS Conflicts with Privacy Law.
System Agency reserves the right to make a final determination regarding the existence of Conflicts of Interest, and Contractor agrees to abide by System Agency’s decision.
Until such procedure is developed and implemented by ICANN, ICANN will review and consider alleged conflicts between applicable laws and non-WHOIS related provisions of this Agreement in a manner similar to ICANN’s Procedure For Handling WHOIS Conflicts with Privacy Law.
HHSC reserves the right to make a final determination regarding the existence of Conflicts of Interest, and ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ agrees to abide by HHSC’s decision.
HHSC reserves the right to make a final determination regarding the existence of Conflicts of Interest, and Contractor agrees to abide by HHSC’s decision.
More Definitions of Conflicts
Conflicts with the DSU. With respect to Article 17.6(i) and the first sentence of Article 17.6(ii), the Appellate Body saw no "conflict" between these provisions and the DSU.14 With respect to the second sentence of Article 17.6(ii), the Appellate Body characterized it as "supplementing, rather than replacing" the DSU: "[A]lthough the second sentence of Article 17.6(ii) of the Anti-Dumping Agreement imposes obligations on panels which are not found in the DSU, we see Article 17.6(ii) as supplementing, rather than replacing, the DSU, and Article 11 in particular. Article 11 requires panels to make an 'objective assessment of the matter' as a whole. Thus, under the DSU, in examining claims, panels must make an 'objective assessment' of the legal provisions at issue, their 'applicability' to the dispute, and the 'conformity' of 12 Appellate Body Report, Guatemala – Cement I, paras. 64 and 67-68. See also Appellate Body Reports, US – Lead and Bismuth II, para. 45, and US – 1916 Act, para. 70 13 Appellate Body Report, US – Corrosion Resistant Steel Sunset Review, fn 82 14 Appellate Body Report, US – Hot-Rolled Steel, paras. 51 and 56-57. the measures at issue with the covered agreements. Nothing in Article 17.6(ii) of the Anti-Dumping Agreement suggests that panels examining claims under that Agreement should not conduct an 'objective assessment' of the legal provisions of the Agreement, their applicability to the dispute, and the conformity of the measures at issue with the Agreement. Article 17.6(ii) simply adds that a panel shall find that a measure is in conformity with the Anti-Dumping Agreement if it rests upon one permissible interpretation of that Agreement."15
Conflicts are defined as the impairment of an employee's ability to perform the duties of his or her position with the ▇▇▇▇▇ County Sheriff's Office. Two common employment conflicts, which may arise, are:
Conflicts has the meaning set forth in Section 8.06(b).
Conflicts. With respect to any particular Transaction, in the event of any conflict between this Agreement and the specific terms of such Transaction (including any terms specified in any Additional Agreements), the latter shall prevail.
Conflicts. The Attorney is entitled to exercise the Attorney's powers under this deed for its own benefit in accordance with the call option set out in clause 30 of the Development Agreement.
Conflicts. In the event of a conflict between these General Terms and Conditions, the remaining Schedules and the Publisher Order Form, the following order of precedence shall apply: Publisher Order Form, General Terms and Conditions and then the remaining Schedules.
Conflicts. Any Arbitrator, prior to his or her appointment, shall disclose to the Parties all actual or perceived conflicts of interest and business relationships involving the Dispute or the Parties, including but not limited to, any professional or social relationships, present or past, with any Party (or its affiliates), including any Party's (or its affiliates) directors, officers, and supervisory personnel and counsel. Any Party may challenge in writing the appointment or continued service of any Arbitrator for lack of independence, partiality, or other cause likely to impair such Arbitrator's ability to effectively participate in the proceedings or render a fair and equitable decision. Where such challenge is made, the appointing authority shall uphold or dismiss the challenge. In the event a challenge is upheld, the Arbitrator shall be replaced. A replacement will be selected in the same manner as the original Arbitrator was selected. If an Arbitrator resigns or becomes unable or unwilling to continue to serve as the Arbitrator, a replacement shall be selected in the same manner as that Arbitrator was chosen.