Examples of Interlocutory decision in a sentence
Interlocutory decision No. 2000-DJ-1680, National Civil Service Office, May 29, 2000.
Criminal Court of the Saravena Circuit sitting in Arauca, Interlocutory decision No. 022-2011 of September 8, 2011 (evidence file, tome 17, folios 9049 to 9056).
Dipl.-Chem.Winter, Brandl, Fürniss, Hübner Röss, Kaiser, Polte PartnerschaftPatent- und Reschtanwaltskanzlei Alois-Steinecker-Strasse 22D-85354 Freising (DE) Decision under appeal: Interlocutory decision of the Opposition Divisionof the European Patent Office posted 6 July 1998 concerning maintenance of European patentNo. 0 439 148 in amended form.
Occasionally or incidentally perform manual or unskilled labor work as required.
Opponent) Kasinostrasse 19-2142097 Wuppertal (DE) Representative: - Respondent: Terumo Kabushiki Kaisha (Proprietor of the patent) No. 44-1, Hatagaya 2-chomeShibuya-ku Tokyo 151 (JP) Representative: Gillard, Marie-Louise Cabinet Beau de Loménie 158, rue de l'Université 75340 Paris Cédex 07 (FR) Decision under appeal: Interlocutory decision of the Opposition Divisionof the European Patent Office posted 7 October 1996 concerning maintenance of European patent No. 0 352 199 in amended form.
Donegani, 12I-44100 Ferrara (IT) Respondent:(Opponent) Univation Technologies, LLC555 San Felipe, Suite 1950 HoustonTexas 77056 (US) Representative: Hayes, Adrian Chetwynd Boult Wade Tennant Verulam Gardens70 Gray’s Inn Road London WC1X 8BT (GB) Decision under appeal: Interlocutory decision of the OppositionDivision of the European Patent Office issued20 June 2001 and posted 17 August 2001 concerning maintenance of European patent No. 0633272 in amended form.
The ‘Living Together Agreement’ replaces the placement plan and should cover the same range of issues and include a focus on the young person’s needs associated with the reason for the “Staying Put” arrangement being agreed.
COMPANY410 North Michigan Avenue Chicago, Illinois 60611 (US) Representative: Hayes, Adrian Chetwynd Boult Wade Tennant Verulam Gardens70 Gray's Inn Road London WC1X 8BT (GB) Decision under appeal: Interlocutory decision of the OppositionDivision of the European Patent Office posted7 November 2007 concerning maintenance of the European patent No. 0793422 in amended form.
Dehn & Co.European Patent Attorneys179 Queen Victoria Street London EC4V 4EL (GB) Decision under appeal: Interlocutory decision of the Opposition Divisionof the European Patent Office posted 28 November 1997 concerning maintenance of European patent No. 0 422 948 in amended form.
It was also stated that when the reasons for the Opposition Division's decision were communicated to the Appellant they had been accompanied by an EPO form 2327, entitled "Interlocutory decision in opposition proceedings (Article 106(3) EPC)".