Patent Validity Sample Clauses

Patent Validity. Any dispute regarding the validity of any Licensed Patent shall be litigated in the courts located in Santa Xxxxx County, California, and the parties agree not to challenge personal jurisdiction in that forum.
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Patent Validity. Nothing in this Agreement shall be construed as a warranty or representation by either party as to the validity or scope of any Patent Rights.
Patent Validity. To Calando’s Knowledge, (i) all issued patents included in the Collective Patent Rights are valid and enforceable; (ii) no claim has been made against Calando, its Affiliates or the Third Party co-owner thereof alleging that any issued patent included in the Collective Patent Rights is invalid or unenforceable; (iii) all assignments of such Patent Rights have been properly executed and recorded; (iv) all issuance, renewal, maintenance and other payments that are or have become due with respect thereto have been timely paid by or on behalf of Calando or the Third Party co-owner thereof; (v) there are no inventorship challenges, opposition or nullity proceedings or interferences declared, commenced or provoked with respect to any Collective Patent Rights; and (vi) with respect to the Assigned Patent Rights and with respect to any Licensed Patent Rights owned, in whole or in part, by Calando, Calando and its Affiliates have, and any co-owner of such Patent Rights has, complied with the duty of candor and disclosure to the United States Patent and Trademark Office and any relevant foreign patent office and have made no material misrepresentation in any patent applications included in or underlying such Patent Rights. Calando has no Knowledge of any information that would preclude it from owning the Assigned IP (immediately prior to the assignment pursuant to Section 2.2) or the Licensed Patent Rights described in clause (vi) hereof.
Patent Validity. Notwithstanding the other provisions of this Clause 20, any dispute that involves the validity, infringement or claim interpretation of a Patent that is issued: (a) in the United States shall be subject to actions before the United States Patent and Trademark Office and/or submitted exclusively to the federal court located in the jurisdiction of the district where any of the defendants resides; and (b) in any other country shall be brought before an appropriate regulatory or administrative body or court in that country, and the Parties hereby consent to the jurisdiction and venue of such courts and bodies. For the sake of clarity, such Patent disputes shall not be subject to the provisions of Clause 20.2. Nothing in this Agreement shall be construed to prevent the Licensee from disputing or challenging the validity of a Third Party’s Patent.
Patent Validity. 28 11.2. Accuracy of Exhibits C and E.................................................................. 28 11.3. Authorization................................................................................. 28 11.4. [ ]*.......................................................................................... 29
Patent Validity. 14.1 If, in any proceeding in which the validity, infringement, or priority of invention of any claim of the LICENSED PATENT(S) to LICENSEE is in issue, a judgment or decree is entered which becomes final (below referred to as an “final judgment”), the construction placed upon any such claim by such final judgment shall thereafter be followed, not only as to such claim but as to all claims to which such construction applies, with respect to subsequently occurring acts. If such final judgment holds any claim invalid, LICENSEE shall be relieved prospectively (1) from including in its reports ROYALTY-BASE PRODUCTS and ROYALTY-BASE SERVICES sold or otherwise disposed of covered only by such claim or any broader claim to which such final judgment is applicable, and (2) from the performance of those other acts which may be required by this Agreement only because of any such claim. However, if there are two or more conflicting final judgments with respect to the same claim based on the same grounds or where the same issues were raised, the decision of the higher tribunal shall be followed, but if the tribunals be of equal dignity, then the decision more favorable to the claim shall be followed.
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Patent Validity. 14.1 If, in any proceeding in which the validity, infringement, or priority of invention of any claim of the LICENSED PATENT to LICENSEE is in issue, a judgment or decree is entered which becomes final (below referred to as a “final judgment”), the construction placed upon any such claim by such final judgment shall thereafter be followed, not only as to such claim but as to all claims to which such construction applies, with respect to subsequently occurring acts. If such final judgment holds any claim invalid, LICENSEE shall be relieved prospectively (1) from including in its reports ROYALTY-BASE PRODUCTS, ROYALTY-BASE PROCESSES or ROYALTY-BASE SERVICES sold or otherwise disposed of covered only by such claim or any broader claim to which such final judgment is applicable, and (2) from the performance of those other acts which may be required by this AGREEMENT only because of any such claim. However, if there are two or more conflicting final judgments with respect to the same claim based on the same grounds or where the same issues were raised, the decision of the higher tribunal shall be followed, but if the tribunals be of equal dignity, then the decision more favorable to the claim shall be followed.
Patent Validity. Nothing in this Agreement shall be construed as a warranty or representation by Metasyn as to the validity or scope of any Metasyn Technology or Patent Rights or that the exercise of the Patent Rights will not infringe upon the rights of any Third Party. Notwithstanding the immediately preceding sentence, except as may have been previously disclosed to MKG, Metasyn is not aware that the Metasyn Technology or Patent Rights infringe upon or in any manner interfere with the patent rights or intellectual property rights of any Third Party.
Patent Validity. 16.1 If any claim challenging the validity or enforceability of any of Patent Rights will be brought against Licensee, Licensee will promptly notify University. University, at its option, will have the right, within thirty (30) days after notification by Licensee of such action, to intervene and take over the sole defense of the claim at University’s expense.
Draft better contracts in just 5 minutes Get the weekly Law Insider newsletter packed with expert videos, webinars, ebooks, and more!