Annual Reassessment Process Sample Clauses

Annual Reassessment Process. In accordance with Section 7.4 of the GIDAP, the CAISO will perform an annual reassessment, as part of a queue cluster interconnection study cycle, in which it will update certain base case data prior to beginning the GIDAP Phase II Interconnection Studies. As set forth in Section 7.4, the CAISO may determine through this assessment that Delivery Network Upgrades already identified and included in executed generator interconnection agreements should be modified in order to reflect the current circumstances of interconnection customers in the queue, including any withdrawals therefrom, and any additions and upgrades approved in the CAISO’s most recent TPP cycle. To the extent that this determination modifies the scope or characteristics of, or the cost responsibility for, any Delivery Network Upgrades set forth in Appendix A to this LGIA, such modification(s) will be reflected through an amendment to this LGIA.
Sample 1Sample 2Sample 3See All (40)
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Annual Reassessment Process. In accordance with Section 7.4 of the GIDAP, the CAISO will perform an annual reassessment in which it will update certain base case data prior to beginning the GIDAP Phase II Interconnection Studies. As set forth in Section 7.4 of the GIDAP, the CAISO may determine through this assessment that Delivery Network Upgrades already identified and included in executed Generator Interconnection Agreements should be modified in order to reflect the current circumstances of Interconnection Customers in the queue, including any withdrawals therefrom, and any additions and upgrades approved in the CAISO’s most recent Transmission Planning Process cycle. To the extent that this determination modifies the scope or characteristics of, or the financial responsibility for, any Delivery Network Upgrades determined pursuant to this SGIA, such modification(s) will be reflected through an amendment to this SGIA.
Sample 1Sample 2Sample 3See All (19)
Annual Reassessment Process. In accordance with Section 7.4 of Appendix DD of the ISO Tariff, the ISO will perform an annual reassessment, as part of a Queue Cluster interconnection study cycle, in which it will update certain base case data prior to beginning the Phase II Interconnection Studies. As set forth in Section 7.4 of Appendix DD of the ISO Tariff, the ISO may determine through this assessment that Delivery Network Upgrades already identified and included in executed generator interconnection agreements should be modified in order to reflect the current circumstances of interconnection customers in the queue, including any withdrawals therefrom, and any additions and upgrades approved in the ISO’s most recent transmission planning process cycle. To the extent that this determination modifies the scope or characteristics of, or the cost responsibility for, any Delivery Network Upgrades set forth in Appendix A to this GIA, such modification(s) will be reflected through an amendment to this GIA.
Sample 1Sample 2Sample 3See All (8)
Annual Reassessment Process. In accordance with Section 7.4 of the GIDAP, the CAISO will perform an annual reassessment, as part of a queue cluster interconnection study cycle, in which it will update certain base case data prior to beginning the GIDAP Phase II Interconnection Studies. As set forth in Section 7.4, the CAISO may determine through this assessment that Delivery Network Upgrades and Off-Peak Network Upgrades already identified and included in executed generator interconnection agreements should be modified in order to reflect the current circumstances of interconnection customers in the queue, including any withdrawals therefrom, and any additions and upgrades approved in the CAISO’s most recent TPP cycle. To the extent that this determination modifies the scope or characteristics of, or the cost responsibility for, any Delivery Network Upgrades and Off-Peak Network Upgrades set forth in Appendix A to this LGIA, such modification(s) will be reflected through an amendment to this LGIA.
Sample 1Sample 2Sample 3See All (6)
Annual Reassessment Process. In accordance with Section 7.4 of Appendix DD of the ISO Tariff, the ISO will perform an annual reassessment, as part of a Queue Cluster interconnection study cycle, in which it will update certain base case data prior to beginning the Phase II Interconnection Studies (as such term is defined in the ISO Tariff). As set forth in Section 7.4 of Appendix DD of the ISO Tariff, the ISO may determine through this assessment that Delivery Network Upgrades already identified and included in executed generator interconnection agreements should be modified in order to reflect the current circumstances of interconnection customers in the queue, including any withdrawals therefrom, and any additions and upgrades approved in the ISO’s most recent transmission planning process cycle. To the extent that this determination modifies the scope or characteristics of, or the cost responsibility for, any Delivery Network Upgrades set forth in Appendix A to this GIA, such modification(s) will be reflected through an amendment to this GIA.
Sample 1Sample 2Sample 3See All (6)
Annual Reassessment Process. In accordance with Section 7.4 of the GIDAP, the CAISO will perform an annual reassessment, as part of a queue cluster interconnection study cycle, in which it will update certain base case data prior to beginning the GIDAP Phase II Interconnection Studies. As set forth in Section 7.4, the CAISO may determine through this assessment that Non-JPP Delivery Network Upgrades and Off-Peak Network Upgrades already DocuSign Envelope ID: 641570BA-608D-4F84-9EF7-D42DF0E7E18D identified and included in executed generator interconnection agreements should be modified in order to reflect the current circumstances of interconnection customers in the queue, including any withdrawals there from, and any additions and upgrades approved in the CAISO’s most recent TPP cycle. To the extent that this determination modifies the scope or characteristics of, or the cost responsibility for, any Non-JPP Delivery Network Upgrades and Off-Peak Network Upgrades set forth in Appendix A-2 to this LGIA, such modification(s) to the Non-JPP Delivery Network will be reflected through an amendment to this LGIA ; provided, however, that nothing in this Section 5.21 shall require APS or IID to agree to any such amendment to this LGIA unless and until adverse impacts arising from the modification of Non-JPP Delivery Network Upgrades and Off-Peak Network Upgrades or then-current circumstances of interconnection customers in the CAISO queue, including any withdrawals there from, and any additions and upgrades approved in the CAISO’s most recent TPP, on the respective Transmission Systems of APS and IID are studied by APS and IID and APS and IID are compensated for the mitigation of such adverse impacts.
Sample 1

Related to Annual Reassessment Process

  • Performance Improvement Process 9.5.1 The purpose of the Performance Improvement Process is to remedy or mitigate the impact of a Performance Factor. The Performance Improvement Process may include: a requirement that the Hospital develop an Improvement Plan; or an amendment of the Hospital’s obligations as mutually agreed by the parties.

  • The Performance Improvement Process (a) The Performance Improvement Process will focus on the risks of non- performance and problem-solving. It may include one or more of the following actions:

  • Payment Process Subject to the terms and conditions established by the Agreement, the pricing per deliverable established by the Grant Work Plan, and the billing procedures established by Department, Department agrees to pay Grantee for services rendered in accordance with Section 215.422, Florida Statutes (F.S.).

  • Enrollment Process The Department may, at any time, revise the enrollment procedures. The Department will advise the Contractor of the anticipated changes in advance whenever possible. The Contractor shall have the opportunity to make comments and provide input on the changes. The Contractor will be bound by the changes in enrollment procedures.

  • Performance Assessment 6.1 The Performance Plan (Annexure A) to this Agreement sets out key performance indicators and competencies that needs to be evaluated in terms of –

  • Completion of Evaluation Cycle 1. The summative evaluation rating shall be based upon a preponderance of the evidence, assessed in a holistic manner, that is aligned to the Ohio Educator Standards. Only evidence gathered during the walkthroughs and formal observations that are conducted for the current school year may be used.

  • Criteria for Performance Assessment A. A teacher’s performance shall be assessed based on the criteria set forth in the evaluation instrument, Appendix D.

  • Change Management Process If Customer or Oracle requests a change in any of the specifications, requirements, Deliverables, or scope (including drawings and designs) of the Professional Services described in any Statement of Work, the party seeking the change shall propose the applicable changes by written notice. Within forty-eight (48) hours of receipt of the written notice, each party’s project leads shall meet, either in person or via telephone conference, to discuss and agree upon the proposed changes. Oracle will prepare a change order describing the proposed changes to the Statement of Work and the applicable change in fees and expenses, if any (each, a “Change Order”). Change Orders are not binding unless and until they are executed by both parties. Executed Change Orders shall be deemed part of, and subject to, this Addendum. If the parties disagree about the proposed changes, the parties shall promptly escalate the change request to their respective senior management for resolution.

  • Conformity Assessment Procedures 1. Each Party shall give positive consideration to accepting the results of conformity assessment procedures of other Parties, even where those procedures differ from its own, provided it is satisfied that those procedures offer an assurance of conformity with applicable technical regulations or standards equivalent to its own procedures.

  • Additional RO Review Criteria (1) In addition to the requirements in Subparagraph 34A, the RO must:

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.