Monitoring Data. 11.1. Taskize does not intend, and is not obliged, to monitor the content of Bubbles (however, Taskize does reserve the right to monitor the content of the Bubbles and the Client consents (on its own behalf and on behalf of each Obliged Person) to Taskize doing so should Taskize consider it necessary or desirable).
Monitoring Data. If Dealer generally provides monitoring services for Solar Systems to its customers, Dealer will install monitoring equipment on each Solar System so that Mosaic, Dealer, and Signed Customers can monitor the solar electricity production, and other data collected by the monitoring equipment no less frequently than on a daily basis, for each Solar System (“Monitoring Data”) via a monitoring web interface provided by the monitoring equipment manufacturer. In such event the Parties will standardize one monitoring equipment vendor to facilitate the capture, reporting and analysis of Monitoring Data. Dealer will use its best efforts to assure that the Monitoring Data is available at all times, and that the monitoring equipment is functioning properly and transmitting Monitoring Data accurately and completely. Dealer will respond to Mosaic and Signed Customers regarding any reports of problems with monitoring equipment or Monitoring Data within one (1) business day.
Monitoring Data. Table A1. Waukegan River, Mean Values of the 1994 to 1996 Fish Samples IBI Taxa Individuais 1994 Samples 24.36 2.3 8 1995 Samples 26.67 3.6 39 1996 Samples 32.83 5.4 66 Spring Samples 28.33 4.0 67 Summer Samples 28.03 3.3 20 Fall Samples 27.50 4.2 26 1994 Sl 25.82 3.3 13 S2 22.18 1.7 6 N1 27.27 3.0 9 N2 22.18 1.3 2 1995 Sl 25.33 4.6 64 S2 26.00 1.3 23 Nl 28.00 6.3 49 N2 27.33 2.0 20 1996 Sl 34.67 8.7 75 S2 28.00 0.7 5 Nl 36.67 7.7 161 N2 32.00 4.7 23 Table A2. Waukegan River, Mean Values of the 1994 to 1996 Benthic Macroinvertebrate Samples Individuais/ MBI Taxa m2 1994 Samples 6.88 8.5 1,556 1995 Samples 6.27 10.1 2,104 1996 Samples 6.97 8.6 2,108 Spring Samples 7.26 6.1 730 Summer Samples 6.58 10.6 3,066 Fall Samples 6.29 10.6 1,972 1994 Sl 6.64 10.3 1,772 S2 7.26 8.7 685 Nl 7.10 8.0 1,504 N2 6.53 7.0 2,262 1995 Sl 6.26 11.0 1,598 S2 6.31 10.3 1,339 Nl 6.10 10.7 3,495 N2 6.43 8.3 1,982 1996 Sl 6.99 9.3 2,019 S2 8.26 7.7 854 Nl 6.31 8.3 2,890 N2 6.33 9.0 2,671 Table A3. Waukegan River, Mean Values of the 1994 to 1996 Habitat Samples Discharge Mean Mean (cfs) width (ft) depth (ft) 1994 Samples 41.85 0.20 9.86 0.36 1995 Samples 41.69 0.55 11.33 0.45 1996 Samples 41.43 3.49 15.12 0.65 Spring Samples 41.10 3.62 13.88 0.53 Summer Samples 41.64 0.27 11.12 0.42 Fall Samples 42.25 0.36 11.32 0.51 1994 Sl 41.51 0.15 8.97 0.27 S2 41.93 0.13 12.79 0.20 Nl 41.66 0.24 8.94 0.65 N2 42.29 0.28 8.74 0.30 1995 Sl 41.93 0.27 9.12 0.55 S2 41.79 0.29 15.61 0.31 Nl 41.40 0.84 9.69 0.73 N2 41.65 0.79 10.91 0.40 1996 Sl 41.34 1.60 13.91 0.86 S2 41.65 1.39 17.64 0.15 Nl 41.23 6.02 14.54 0.90 N2 41.52 4.95 14.39 0.68 60
Monitoring Data. Record monitoring data at 15-minute intervals on the reverse side of this permit. Acceptable Atmospheric Conditions: Oxygen not less than 19.5% or more than 23.5%, LEL/LFL/not more than 10%, H2S not more than 10 ppm. Work Authorization Signatures All confined space work must be authorized by the General Manager, Plant Manager or Collection Crew Manager Work authorized by: Entry Authorization I certify that the confined space work authorized by this permit has been reviewed with the entry team and that acceptable entry conditions exist and the necessary equipment for safe entry has been provided. Entry supervisor signature: Permit Cancellation Date: Time: Entry supervisor signature: Date/Time: LGVSD HOT WORK PERMIT
Monitoring Data. Glendale agrees to provide Xxxxxxx with the results of any sampling or submissions to ADEQ pursuant to Paragraphs 4 and 5, at the same time Glendale provides the submissions to ADEQ.
Monitoring Data. As provided by SGMA Regulations section 354.40, the Plan Manager shall submit monitoring data on forms provided or approved by DWR and included in the Annual Reports.
Monitoring Data. 6 Monitoring studies can be useful for comparing concentrations measured in the field with 7 concentrations predicted by a mathematical model such as GLEAMS and models used by U.S. 8 EPA/OPP. When available, such studies can provide a strong indication of the plausibility of modeled 9 concentrations of a pesticide in surface water. No such studies were identified for indaziflam.
Monitoring Data. Item Frequency Number of properties where contracts exchanged, including: • bedroom size • whether located in another borough area • who will own the dwellings • how properties obtained Every 2 months Number of properties occupied/ ready to let, including bedroom size Every 2 months Number of resettlement scheme households housed Every 2 months Number of pending resettlement scheme properties pre-matched to current/ former bridging hotel households Every 2 months Total expenditure (incl grant and other funding) Every 2 months Total committed spend (incl grant and other funding) Every 2 months DLUHC grant used Every 2 months Overall assessment (RAG rated) of whether delivery is on track as determined by the responsible Council officer Every 2 months Table 4 – Evaluation Data Item Frequency How properties have been sourced (e.g. through stock acquisition or another delivery route) In April 2024 and thereafter upon request to aid with evaluation of the fund How the Council has funded its contributory share Breakdown of resettlement scheme households housed by previous housing situation, e.g. in bridging hotel, in LA emergency accommodation/temporary accommodation Tenancy duration Rent levels Number of properties obtained outside the local authority’s area, if applicable, and where these are located.
Monitoring Data. BHP shall deliver monitoring data and information to the Monitoring Agency in time frames and in formats developed in Consultation with the Monitoring Agency.
Monitoring Data. In order to calibrate the tailwater data model, monitoring data from 15 sites was collected at various pour points in the Shasta Valley during the 2008 irrigation season. Tailwater flow and temperature was logged hourly at each site, in order to obtain mean daily maximums. Upstream of each tailwater pour point, river temperatures were also logged hourly, to obtain mean daily temperatures. Various river gaging stations were monitored for discharge to obtain the mean daily discharge for the irrigation season. The monitoring data was essential in fine tuning the weighted run-off coefficients, which were based on slope and soils.
