Examples of Patent Disputes in a sentence
Subject to Section 20.6.1 (Choice of Law) regarding Patent Disputes and Section 15.2.1(b), if applicable, any other such dispute or failure to agree not resolved by the chief patent counsels of the Parties may be referred to the JSC for resolution.
Any Dispute which may arise between the Parties that is not resolved pursuant to Section 10.1 shall be settled by binding arbitration as set forth in this Section 10.2, excluding any Patent Disputes as specified in Section 10.5 (which shall be resolved pursuant to Section 10.5).
Any Dispute which may arise between the Parties that is not resolved pursuant to Section 10.1 shall be settled by binding arbitration as set forth in this Section 10.2, excluding any Patent Disputes as specified in Section 10.5 (which shall be resolved pursuant to Section 16.5).
JJC shall require all its Affiliates to become subject in full to the dispute resolution procedures set forth in ARTICLE XV.A and ARTICLE XV.B for all Disputes and Patent Disputes, respectively, in which any such Affiliate has any interest.
To the extent that the Parties cannot agree on the rules of the arbitration, then the Commercial Arbitration Rules of the American Arbitration Association (“AAA”) in effect at the time of the commencement of the arbitration or, if applicable, its Supplementary Rules for the Resolution of Patent Disputes in effect at the time of the commencement of the arbitration, and except as the applicable rules are modified by this Agreement, shall apply.
Except as set forth in Section 15.4 (Preliminary Injunctions) and Section 15.5 (Patent Disputes), or unless otherwise set forth herein, any Dispute that is not resolved pursuant to Section 15.2 (Resolution by Executive Officers) shall be exclusively and finally resolved by binding arbitration pursuant to this Section 15.3 (Arbitration).
Subject to Section 16.6 (Patent Disputes) and Section 16.7 (Equitable Relief), each Party irrevocably submits to the exclusive jurisdiction of (a) the courts of the State of New York located in New York, NY, and (b) the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, for the purposes of any Dispute arising out of this Agreement.
On June 30, 1998, Cook filed suit in the Regional Court, Dusseldorf Division for Patent Disputes, in Dusseldorf, Germany against the Company alleging that the Company's Passager(TM) peripheral vascular stent graft and Vanguard(TM) endovascular aortic graft products infringe the same Cook patent.
Any arbitration award may be entered in and enforced by a court in accordance with Section 18.4.5 (Award), Section 18.5 (Injunctive Relief) and Section 18.8 (Patent Disputes), as applicable.
Such joinder shall not be required, however, if it would bar or delay assertion of a Non-Patent Dispute because of the limit on the number of simultaneously pending Patent Disputes established under Section 20(b)(iv) or 20(b)(v).