Task 2. Refine Site-Specific MEP Evaluation Plans; • Task 3: Develop Specific Stakeholder Acceptance/Satisfaction Evaluation Plan; • Task 4: Develop Site-Specific Data Plans; • Task 5: Develop Site-Specific Analysis, Modeling, and Simulation (AMS) Plans; • Task 6: Develop Site-Specific Safety Management Plans; • Task 7: Develop Site-Specific Acquisition, Installation and Test Plans; • Task 8: Develop Site-Specific Participant Training and Evaluation Outreach Plans; and • Task 9: Develop Site-Specific Comprehensive Evaluation Plans (CEP). NOTE: Preliminary site-specific MEP Evaluation Plans are included as an Appendix to this PWS. As part of this task order, the Contractor shall refine the government furnished site-specific MEP Evaluation Plans as not all elements of the evaluation approach (i.e., Observed Data Analysis, Simulation-Based Evaluation, and Survey-Based Evaluation) will be covered in detail. The Contractor shall also provide preliminary estimates of the cost of conducting the evaluation as a part of the Refined Evaluation Plans (Task 2). These preliminary estimates shall be further refined by the Contractor in the site-specific Comprehensive Evaluation Plans (Task 9), once the specifics of the Pilot Sites’ deployment, performance measurement, and evaluation support strategies become clearer. Evaluation activity and associated cost estimation should be used to prioritize and scope activity within the CEP to provide the most effective evaluation possible given CV Pilot Deployment Program cost and schedule constraints. Execution of this task order shall require frequent coordination with the Pilot Deployers and the USDOT Evaluation team.
Task 2 delivery of two RMG cranes to container terminal in Brzeg Dolny, in accordance with the requirements of the Annex no.1.
Task 2. Visit the project site, as necessary.
Examples of Task 2 in a sentence
Xxxxxx-Xxxx will utilize the information developed in Tasks 2 and 3 to incorporate any necessary FDOT flows into the Future Conditions Model, and update the model as developed in Task 2 to represent the culvert size.
While we anticipate that some travel data will be identified during Task 2, it is likely that additional data will be needed.
EXHIBIT C FEE SCHEDULE Project Advisor Project Manager PI Manager XX Xxxxxxx PBA Associate II Transit Planner Clerical OA Phase I Task 1: Defining Strategy Focus Task 2: Understanding the Audience 2.1 Stakeholder Meetings 16 1 48 2.2 Surveys 4 12 Task 3.
Additional technical discussions will be developed to detail out the AECOM analyses developed under Task 2.
AECOM will work with the GLO to determine if this data would be helpful to add to the AECOM-developed GIS interface, and, if deemed beneficial, will work to accomplish this in coordination with the Database Management subtask in Task 2.
More Definitions of Task 2
Task 2. PTC Data Management
Task 2. [Task name here]
Task 2. Provide implementation support for the Regional Climate Action Plan ("RCAP") 2.0 Task 2.1: RCAP Implementation Workshops (two per year) Representative tasks include: Designing the workshop and agenda; managing logistics; and producing the guidance materials from the RCAP for the Compact website. Task 3: Compact Communications Support Task 3.1: Compact Website and Compact Currents Representative tasks include: Providing ongoing support and maintenance to the Compact website; developing new content and pages on the Compact site; developing and delivering the Compact’s quarterly e-newsletter.
Task 2. 1: Fill in the gaps in the Land Use Element We will provide missing information and update data to current information, then streamline and clarify the discussion of the foundational growth estimates for 2035 and their relationship to growth targets and land capacity. We will introduce more Covington-centric graphics as a means of portraying the relevance of the data and increase reader interest. Finally, technical data will be consolidated into the Existing Conditions and Trends Report. Specific subtasks include:
Task 2. Develop Driver-Pressure-Impact-Response-Recovery chains Altogether, 18 WISER scientists and three external end users (river basin managers from France, Germany and the Netherlands) attended a workshop on conceptual modelling of degradation and restoration effects on riverine biota (November 2009, Wageningen). The experts developed Response- Recovery chains for several restoration/management scenarios (e.g., riparian buffer instalment, in- stream habitat improvement, xxxx removal) which were later fit into a conceptual framework and provided the basis for D5.1-1 (Conceptual Models and effects of river rehabilitation and restoration measures on aquatic organisms). Altogether, six different conceptual models have been drafted during the workshop on water quality improvements in i) low- and ii) high-energy rivers, on mesohabitat improvements in iii) low- and iv) high-energy rivers, on v) xxxx removal, and on vi) lake oligotrophication and vii) the reduction of lake water level fluctuations. Three combined models (water quality improvement, mesohabitat improvement and xxxx removal) have eventually been selected for an extensive literature review. This review also provided the analytical basis to describe the effects of river restoration/management on the aquatic fauna and flora. The multivariate analysis to analyse the Driver-Pressure-Impact chains have not yet started due to the delayed finalisation of the large-scale database. This also applies to the estimation of the effects of global/climate change on degradation and recovery, which is planned for the second half of the project. Objective 2: Develop mathematical models to predict the response of BQEs to pressure reduction and finally the conditions required to reach good ecological status.
Task 2. Understanding the Audience
Task 2. Caltrans Traffic Control Plan Preparation Xxxxxx-Xxxx will prepare a traffic control plan (TCP) at a scale of 1”=40’ (up to 2 sheets) for the work to be prepared for the San Xxxxxxxx/Burbank Boulevard Improvement Project. The TCP shall abide by the following: • Pedestrian access maintained, including detours, along the south side of Burbank Boulevard during construction of widening. • Assume that rightmost right turn lane off of I-5 North freeway ramp will be the only lane closure on the ramp. • Eastbound right turn onto San Xxxxxxxx Boulevard shall be detoured to Third Street; right turning lane shall be closed during widening construction. • Requirement for night construction to minimize impact of closures (including ramp) on traffic and pedestrians (9pm to 5am). • Minimize work or signage within Caltrans jurisdiction (i.e. no signage on freeway or bridge). Xxxxxx-Xxxx will submit the TCP to Caltrans for review and will respond to one (1) round of comments following Caltrans review. Xxxxxx-Xxxx will attend up to two (2) conference calls for coordination of the TCP and/or comment resolution with the City and/or Caltrans to obtain consensus.