Common use of AGGREGATE SETTLEMENTS Clause in Contracts

AGGREGATE SETTLEMENTS. Often times in cases where Attorneys represent multiple clients in similar litigation, the opposing parties or Defendants attempt to settle or otherwise resolve Attorneys' cases in a group or groups, by making a single settlement offer to settle a number of cases simultaneously. There exists a potential conflict of interest whenever a lawyer represents multiple clients in a settlement of this type because it necessitates choices concerning the allocation of limited settlement amounts among the multiple clients. However, if all clients consent, a group settlement can be accomplished and a single offer can be fairly distributed among the clients by assigning settlement amounts based upon the strengths and weaknesses of each case, the relative nature, severity and extent of injuries, and individual case evaluations. In the event of a group or aggregate settlement proposal, Attorneys may implement a settlement program, overseen by a referee or special master, who may be appointed by a court, designed to ensure consistency and fairness for all claimants, and which will assign various settlement values and amounts to each client’s case depending upon the facts and circumstances of each individual case. The District authorizes us to enter into and engage in group settlement discussions and agreements which may include The District’s individual claims. Although The District authorizes us to engage in such group settlement discussions and agreements, The District will still retain the right to approve, and Attorneys are required to obtain The District’s approval of, any settlement of The District’s case.

AGGREGATE SETTLEMENTS. Often times in cases where Attorneys represent multiple clients in similar litigation, the opposing parties or Defendants defendants attempt to settle or otherwise resolve all of Attorneys' ’ cases in a group or groups, by making a single settlement offer to settle a number of cases simultaneously. There exists a potential conflict of interest whenever a lawyer represents multiple clients in a settlement of this type because it necessitates choices concerning the allocation of limited settlement amounts among the multiple clients. However, if all clients consent, a group settlement can be accomplished and a single offer can be fairly distributed among the clients by assigning settlement amounts based upon the strengths and weaknesses of each case, the relative nature, severity and extent of injuries, and individual case evaluations. In the event of a group or aggregate settlement proposal, Attorneys may implement a settlement program, overseen by a referee or special master, who may be appointed by a court, designed to ensure consistency and fairness for all claimants, and which will assign various settlement values and amounts to each client’s case depending upon the facts and circumstances of each individual case. The District Client authorizes us Attorneys to enter into and engage in group settlement discussions and agreements which that may include The DistrictClient’s individual claims. Although The District Client authorizes us Attorneys to engage in such group settlement discussions and agreements, The District will still retain Client retains the right to approveapprove any settlement of Client’s claims, and Attorneys are required to obtain The DistrictClient’s approval of, any settlement of The Districtbefore settling Client’s caseclaims.

AGGREGATE SETTLEMENTS. Often times in cases where Attorneys represent multiple clients in similar litigation, the opposing parties or and/or Defendants attempt to settle or and/or otherwise resolve Attorneys' cases in a group or groups, by making a single settlement offer to settle a number of cases simultaneously. There exists a potential conflict of interest whenever a lawyer represents multiple clients in a settlement of this type because it necessitates choices concerning the allocation of limited settlement amounts among the multiple clients. However, if all clients consent, a group settlement can be accomplished and a single offer can be fairly distributed among the clients by assigning settlement amounts based upon the strengths and weaknesses of each case, the relative nature, severity severity, and extent of injuries, and individual case evaluations. In the event of a group or aggregate settlement proposal, Attorneys may implement a settlement program, overseen by a referee or and/or special master, who may be appointed by a court, designed to ensure consistency and fairness for all claimants, and which will shall assign various settlement values and amounts to each client’s case depending upon the facts and circumstances of each individual case. The District Client authorizes us Attorneys to enter into and engage in group settlement discussions and agreements which may include The DistrictClient’s individual claims. Although The District Client authorizes us Attorneys to engage in such group settlement discussions and agreements, The District will Client shall still retain the right to approve, and Attorneys are required to obtain The DistrictClient’s approval of, any settlement of The DistrictClient’s case.

AGGREGATE SETTLEMENTS. Often times in cases where Attorneys attorneys represent multiple clients in similar litigation, the opposing adverse parties or Defendants defendants attempt to settle or otherwise resolve Attorneysattorneys' cases in a group or groups, by making a single settlement offer to settle a number of cases simultaneously. There exists a potential conflict of interest whenever a lawyer an attorney(s) represents multiple clients in a settlement of this type because as it necessitates choices concerning the allocation of a limited settlement amounts among the multiple clients. However, if all clients consent, a group settlement can be accomplished and a single offer can be fairly distributed among the clients by assigning settlement amounts based upon the strengths and weaknesses of each case, the relative nature, severity and extent of injuriesthe damages, and individual case evaluations. In the event of a group or aggregate settlement proposal, the Attorneys may implement a settlement program, overseen by a referee or special master, who may be appointed by a court, designed to ensure consistency and fairness for all claimants, and which will assign various settlement values and amounts to each client’s case depending upon the facts and circumstances of each individual case. The District Client authorizes us the Attorneys to enter into and engage in group settlement discussions and agreements which may include The Districtthe Client’s individual claims. Although The District the Client authorizes us the Attorneys to engage in such group settlement discussions and agreements, The District the Client will still retain the right to approve, and the Attorneys are required to obtain The Districtthe Client’s approval of, any settlement of The Districtin the Client’s case.

AGGREGATE SETTLEMENTS. Often times in cases where Attorneys represent multiple clients in similar litigation, the opposing parties or Defendants attempt to settle or otherwise resolve Attorneys' ’ cases in a group or groups, by making a single settlement offer to settle a number of cases simultaneously. There exists a potential conflict of interest whenever a lawyer represents multiple clients in a settlement of this type because it necessitates choices concerning the allocation of limited settlement amounts among the multiple clients. However, if all clients consent, a group settlement can be accomplished and a single offer can be fairly distributed among the clients by assigning settlement amounts based upon the strengths and weaknesses of each case, the relative nature, severity and extent of injuries, and individual case evaluations. In the event of a group or aggregate settlement proposal, Attorneys may implement a settlement program, overseen by a referee or special master, who may be appointed by a court, designed to ensure consistency and fairness for all claimants, and which will assign various settlement values and amounts to each client’s case depending upon the facts and circumstances of each individual case. The District authorizes us Attorneys to enter into and engage in group settlement discussions and agreements which may include The the District’s individual claims. Although The the District authorizes us Attorneys to engage in such group settlement discussions and agreements, The the District will still retain the right to approve, and Attorneys are required to obtain The the District’s approval of, any settlement of The the District’s case.

AGGREGATE SETTLEMENTS. Often times in cases where Attorneys represent multiple clients in similar litigation, the opposing parties or Defendants attempt to settle or otherwise resolve Attorneys' cases in a group or groups, by making a single settlement offer to settle a number of cases simultaneously. There exists a potential conflict of interest whenever a lawyer represents multiple clients in a settlement of this type because it necessitates choices concerning the allocation of limited settlement amounts among the multiple clients. However, if all clients consent, a group settlement can be accomplished and a single offer can be fairly distributed among the clients by assigning settlement amounts based upon the strengths and weaknesses of each case, the relative nature, severity and extent of injuries, and individual case evaluations. In the event of a group or aggregate settlement proposal, Attorneys may implement a settlement program, overseen by a referee or special master, who may be appointed by a court, designed to ensure consistency and fairness for all claimants, and which will assign various settlement values and amounts to each client’s case depending upon the facts and circumstances of each individual case. The District authorizes us to enter into and engage in group settlement discussions and agreements which may include The the District’s individual claims. Although The the District authorizes us to engage in such group settlement discussions and agreements, The the District will still retain the right to approve, and Attorneys are required to obtain The the District’s approval of, any settlement of The the District’s case.

AGGREGATE SETTLEMENTS. Often times in cases where Attorneys represent multiple clients in similar litigation, the opposing parties or Defendants attempt to settle or otherwise resolve Attorneys' cases in a group or groups, by making a single settlement offer to settle a number of cases simultaneously. There exists a potential conflict of interest whenever a lawyer represents multiple clients in a settlement of this type because it necessitates choices concerning the allocation of limited settlement amounts among the multiple clients. However, if all clients consent, a group settlement can be accomplished and a single offer can be fairly distributed among the clients by assigning settlement amounts based upon the strengths and weaknesses of each case, the relative nature, severity and extent of injuries, and individual case evaluations. In the event of a group or aggregate settlement proposal, Attorneys may implement a settlement program, overseen by a referee or special master, who may be appointed by a court, designed to ensure consistency and fairness for all claimants, and which will assign various settlement values and amounts to each client’s case depending upon the facts and circumstances of each individual case. The District authorizes us to enter into and engage in group settlement discussions and agreements which may include The District’s individual claims. Although The the District authorizes us to engage in such group settlement discussions and agreements, The District will still retain the right to approve, and Attorneys are required to obtain The District’s approval of, any settlement of The District’s case.