Alternative Approaches. The A/E shall review with DFCM, alternative approaches to design and construction of the Project. Several options shall be submitted for DFCM’s evaluation.
Alternative Approaches. If either Party is unable to obtain a required consent, then, unless and until such required consent is obtained, Provider and Company shall determine and adopt such mutually agreeable alternative approaches as are necessary and sufficient to provide the Services without such required consent. If such alternative approaches are required for a period longer than sixty (60) days following the Effective Date or an Order Effective Date, the Parties shall equitably adjust the terms of the Agreement and reduce the Services Costs to reflect any additional costs and expenses being incurred by Company and any Services not being received by Company. In addition, if Provider fails to obtain a Provider Required Consent within sixty (60) days of the Effective Date or an Order Effective Date and such failure has a material adverse impact on Company’s receipt of the Services, Company may, upon notice to Provider, terminate the Agreement, in whole or in part, as of the termination date specified in the notice, without cost or penalty and without the payment of any termination charges. The failure to obtain any Provider Required Consent shall not relieve Provider of its obligations under the Agreement and Provider shall not be entitled to any additional compensation or reimbursement of any amounts in connection with obtaining or failing to obtain any Provider Required Consent or implementing any alternative approach required by such failure.
Alternative Approaches. If a Party is unable to obtain a Required Consent, then, unless and until such Required Consent is obtained, HPES and HPI will determine and adopt, subject to HPI’s approval, such alternative approaches as are necessary and sufficient for the Services to be provided without such Required Consent. If such alternative approaches are required for a period longer than 60 days following the Effective Date, the Parties will equitably adjust the terms of this Agreement, including the Charges in accordance with the applicable Charges Methodology to reflect (A) if the alternative approach is required because HPES is unable to obtain an HPES Required Consent, any additional costs and expenses being incurred by the Service Recipients and any Services not being received by the Service Recipients, or (B) if the alternative approach is required because HPI is unable to obtain an HPI Required Consent, any additional costs and expenses being incurred by HPES. In addition, if HPES fails to obtain an HPES Required Consent within 60 days following the Effective Date and such failure has a material adverse impact on the Service IT Service Agreement Recipients’ receipt of the Services, HPI may, upon notice to HPES, terminate this Agreement without regard to Section 29.1, in whole or in part, as of the termination date specified in the notice, without cost or penalty and without the payment of any termination charges, subject to Section 7.1(B) of Schedule 5. The failure to obtain any HPES Required Consent will not relieve HPES of its obligations under this Agreement and HPES will not be entitled to any additional compensation or reimbursement of any amounts in connection with obtaining or failing to obtain any HPES Required Consent or implementing any alternative approach required by such failure.
Alternative Approaches. The DESIGNER shall review with GSD, alternative approaches to design and construction of the Project. Several options shall be submitted for GSD’s evaluation.
Alternative Approaches. For all performance standards which have annual performance requirements, the City will allow alternative approaches to satisfying the goals of those requirements. The Concessionaire will provide the City with the details and the implementation schedule for the proposed alternative approach for the City’s review and approval. The annual activity level of the proposed alternative approach will not be less than that stated as a performance requirement. The City will not unreasonably withhold approval of the proposed alternative approach. Ancillary requirements and associated operational liquidated damages will have to be redefined. As an example, in the Water Supply section, the Concessionaire may propose to perform a leak survey of the entire distribution system initially to enjoy economies of scale and to identify and repair larger leaks sooner to reduce production costs. The City and the Concessionaire will mutually develop the associated repair and operational liquidated damages aspects of the alternative approach.
Alternative Approaches. DESIGN‐BUILDER shall review with the TAX COLLECTOR alternative approaches to design and construction of the PROJECT to save time and costs whenever possible.
Alternative Approaches. DESIGN-BUILDER shall review with the CITY alternative approaches to design and construction of the Project to save time and costs whenever possible.
Alternative Approaches. Review with LVMPD Facilities, alternative approaches to design and construction of the Project, as necessary.
Alternative Approaches. Assessing the creditworthiness of a Contractor is part of an overall assessment of the value for money provided by the Agreement. There will be circumstances when either a Contractor will not or cannot provide the credit support that the Authority requires but, credit apart, would be the preferred supplier. In these circumstances the concerns regarding credit need to be recorded and consideration given to reducing the exposure of the Authority to a possible default by the Contractor. Areas that can be addressed in this context will include:
Alternative Approaches. In the late stages of GN2 (Q2 2008), SA5 (eduroam operations), the first solution to this emerging problem was created: National operators were supposed to collect statistics regarding their own infrastructure on their own to supply eduroam database content, then report the monthly summary of authentication traffic via an XML file which would be polled by the eduroam database collector. See the corresponding tool documentation [DBASE]. Unfortunately, uptake of this mechanism was rather poor. The database collection mechanism was widely accepted for static data, such as locations of access points, contact details of local administrators etc. On the other hand, constantly changing data, such as the requested statistics, was much less accepted and used. The reasons for that remain unclear; but it may be that the extraction, collation and creation of an XML file, then export of this file to a web server was too complex and fragile to be executed on a regular basis by many. Consequently, an alternative, more lightweight mechanism was required. Section 3.5.2 details the requirements that form the basis of a solution which is likely to be accepted.
