Common use of APPOINTMENT AND EVALUATION Clause in Contracts

APPOINTMENT AND EVALUATION. 1. Appointment to a training program at OSU-UH is made in accordance with the National Resident Matching Program or other nationally recognized matching programs, when available. If there is no matching program, selection will be based upon guidelines approved by the Graduate Medical Education Committee and based upon program-specific selection policies and procedures. 2. Advancement or appointment to a subsequent sub-specialty fellowship after successful completion of a training program is not to be considered a right or entitlement of a Resident. 3. If a resident is appointed to a position in a preliminary training program and has not also matched or appointed into a categorical position in a residency program, appointment to a subsequent residency program or advancement to a PGY- 2 preliminary position is not considered a right or entitlement of a resident. 4. Inclusion of elements from the ACGME’s six required competency areas and CLER focus areas in the evaluation of the Resident will be undertaken by each accredited training program. A complete evaluation of the Resident's performance includes but is not limited to: a. evaluation of clinical performance by the Department's faculty, other healthcare professionals, and patients as determined by program evaluation processes on routine evaluations. b. attendance records at mandatory conferences, and c. satisfactory performance on the relevant In-Training Examination, if available. 5. The Resident will meet with the Program Director for a performance evaluation twice yearly at a minimum, and more frequently during periods of remediation or probation at the discretion of the Program Director. 6. The permanent electronic performance evaluations will be readily accessible to the Resident in the resident management system (MedHub). 7. The Resident has the right to challenge the accuracy of a written or electronic evaluation or report of his/her performance. The Resident may discuss the report with the Program Director and if the problem is not satisfactorily resolved, may choose to meet with the Department or Division Evaluation Committee or other Committees designated by the Program Director and to present rebuttal evidence. The decision of the Program Director on written or electronic evaluations is final. 8. At the successful completion of the training program, the Program Director must meet his/her obligation to document the clinical competence of Residents to be recommended to the appropriate certifying board.

APPOINTMENT AND EVALUATION. 1. Appointment to a training program at OSU-UH is made in accordance with the National Resident Matching Program or o r other nationally recognized matching programs, when available. If there is no matching program, selection will be based upon guidelines approved by the Graduate Medical Education Committee and based upon program-specific selection policies and procedures. 2. Advancement or appointment to a subsequent sub-specialty fellowship after successful completion of a training program is not to be considered a right or entitlement of a Resident. 3. If a resident is appointed to a position in a preliminary training program and has not also matched or appointed into a categorical position in a residency program, appointment to a subsequent residency program or advancement to a PGY- 2 preliminary position is not considered a right or entitlement of a resident. 4. Inclusion of elements from the ACGME’s six required competency areas and CLER focus areas in the evaluation of the Resident will be undertaken by each accredited training program. A complete evaluation of the Resident's performance includes but is not limited to: a. evaluation of clinical performance by the Department's faculty, other healthcare professionals, and patients as determined by program evaluation processes on routine evaluations. b. attendance records at mandatory conferences, and c. satisfactory performance on the relevant In-Training Examination, if available. 5. The Resident will meet with the Program Director for a performance evaluation twice yearly at a minimum, and more frequently during periods of remediation or probation at the discretion of the Program Director. 6. The permanent electronic performance evaluations will be readily accessible to the Resident in the resident management system (MedHub). 7. The Resident has the right to challenge the accuracy of a written or electronic evaluation or report of his/her performance. The Resident may discuss the report with the Program Director and if the problem is not satisfactorily resolved, may choose to meet with the Department or Division Evaluation Committee or other Committees designated by the Program Director and to present rebuttal evidence. The decision of the Program Director on written or electronic evaluations is final. 8. At the successful completion of the training program, the Program Director must meet his/her obligation to document the clinical competence of Residents to be recommended to the appropriate certifying board.

APPOINTMENT AND EVALUATION. 1. Appointment to a training program at OSU-UH OSUWMC is made in accordance with the National Resident Matching Program or other nationally recognized matching programs, when available. If there is no matching program, selection will be based upon guidelines approved by the Graduate Medical Education Committee and based upon program-specific selection policies and procedures. 2. Advancement or appointment to a subsequent sub-specialty fellowship after successful completion of a training program is not to be considered a right or entitlement of a Resident. 3. If a resident is appointed to a position in a preliminary training program and has not also matched or appointed into a categorical position in a residency program, appointment to a subsequent residency program or advancement to a PGY- 2 preliminary position is not considered a right or entitlement of a resident. 4. Inclusion of elements from the ACGME’s six required competency areas and CLER focus areas in the evaluation of the Resident will be undertaken by each accredited training program. A complete evaluation of the Resident's performance includes but is not limited to: a. evaluation of clinical performance by the Department's faculty, other healthcare professionals, and patients as determined by program evaluation processes on routine evaluations. b. attendance records at mandatory conferences, and c. satisfactory performance on the relevant In-Training Examination, if available. 5. The Resident will meet with the Program Director for a performance evaluation twice yearly at a minimum, and more frequently during periods of remediation or probation at the discretion of the Program Director. 6. The permanent electronic performance evaluations will be readily accessible to the Resident in the resident management system (MedHub). 7. The Resident has the right to challenge the accuracy of a written or electronic evaluation or report of his/her performance. The Resident may discuss the report with the Program Director and if the problem is not satisfactorily resolved, may choose to meet with the Department or Division Evaluation Committee or other Committees designated by the Program Director and to present rebuttal evidence. The decision of the Program Director on written or electronic evaluations is final. 8. At the successful completion of the training program, the Program Director must meet his/her obligation to document the clinical competence of Residents to be recommended to the appropriate certifying board.