Common use of Apportionment of Tax Attributes Clause in Contracts

Apportionment of Tax Attributes. Houston shall reasonably determine in good faith, and advise Seattle in writing, of the amount of any Tax Attributes arising in a Pre-Distribution Period that shall be allocated or apportioned to the Seattle Group under applicable Law, provided that this Section 3.07 shall not be construed as obligating Houston to undertake an “earnings & profits study” or similar determinations. Houston shall consult in good faith with Seattle regarding such determinations, and shall provide such information and otherwise cooperate in good faith as reasonably requested by Seattle. In the event that Seattle disagrees with any such determination, Houston and Seattle shall endeavor in good faith to resolve such disagreement, and, failing that, the allocations and apportionments under this Section 3.07 shall be determined in accordance with the disagreement resolution provisions of Section 14 as promptly as practicable. The Houston Group and the Seattle Group agree to compute all Taxes for Post-Distribution Periods consistently with the determination of the allocation of Tax Attributes pursuant to this Section 3.07 unless otherwise required by a Final Determination. To the extent that the amount of any Tax Attribute is later reduced or increased as a result of a Final Determination, such reduction or increase shall be allocated to the Party to which such Tax Attribute was allocated pursuant to this Section 3.07.

Apportionment of Tax Attributes. Houston shall reasonably determine in good faith, and advise Seattle Xxxxxxx in writing, of the amount of any Tax Attributes arising in a Pre-Distribution Period that shall be allocated or apportioned to Xxxxxxx and/or the Seattle Xxxxxxx Group under applicable Law, provided that this Section 3.07 shall not be construed as obligating Houston to undertake an “earnings & profits study” or similar determinationsdetermination. Houston shall consult in good faith with Seattle Xxxxxxx regarding such determinations, and shall provide such information and otherwise cooperate in good faith as reasonably requested by Seattle. In the event that Seattle Xxxxxxx disagrees with any such determination, Houston and Seattle Xxxxxxx shall endeavor in good faith to resolve such disagreement, and, failing that, the allocations and apportionments under this Section 3.07 shall be determined in accordance with the disagreement resolution provisions of Section 14 as promptly as practicable. The Houston Group and the Seattle Xxxxxxx Group agree to compute all Taxes for Post-Distribution Periods consistently with the determination of the allocation of Tax Attributes pursuant to this Section 3.07 unless otherwise required by a Final Determination. To the extent that the amount of any Tax Attribute is later reduced or increased as a result of a Final Determination, such reduction or increase shall be allocated to the Party to which such Tax Attribute was allocated pursuant to this Section 3.07.

Apportionment of Tax Attributes. (a) . Houston shall reasonably determine in good faith, and advise Seattle Xxxxxxx in writing, of the amount of any Tax Attributes arising in a Pre-Distribution Period that shall be allocated or apportioned to the Seattle Xxxxxxx Group under applicable Law, provided that this Section 3.07 shall not be construed as obligating Houston to undertake an “earnings & profits study” or similar determinationsdetermination. Houston shall consult in good faith with Seattle Xxxxxxx regarding such determinations, and shall provide such information and otherwise cooperate in good faith as reasonably requested by Seattle. In the event that Seattle Xxxxxxx disagrees with any such determination, Houston and Seattle Xxxxxxx shall endeavor in good faith to resolve such disagreement, and, failing that, the allocations and apportionments under this Section 3.07 shall be determined in accordance with the disagreement resolution provisions of Section 14 as promptly as practicable. The Houston Group and the Seattle Xxxxxxx Group agree to compute all Taxes for Post-Distribution Periods consistently with the determination of the allocation of Tax Attributes pursuant to this Section 3.07 unless otherwise required by a Final Determination. To the extent that the amount of any Tax Attribute is later reduced or increased as a result of a Final Determination, such reduction or increase shall be allocated to the Party to which such Tax Attribute was allocated pursuant to this Section 3.07.

Apportionment of Tax Attributes. Houston shall reasonably determine in good faith, and advise Seattle in writing, of the amount of any Tax Attributes arising in a Pre-Distribution Period that shall be allocated or apportioned to the Seattle Group under applicable Law, provided that this Section 3.07 shall not be construed as obligating Houston to undertake an “earnings & profits study” or similar determinations. Houston shall consult in good faith with Seattle regarding such determinations, and shall provide such information and otherwise cooperate in good faith as reasonably requested by Seattle. In the event that Seattle disagrees with any such determination, Houston and Seattle shall endeavor in good faith to resolve such disagreement, and, failing that, the allocations and apportionments under this Section 3.07 shall be determined in accordance with the disagreement resolution provisions of Section 14 as promptly as practicable. The Houston Group and the Seattle Group agree to compute all Taxes for Post-Distribution Periods consistently with the determination of the allocation of Tax Attributes pursuant to this Section 3.07 unless otherwise required by a Final Determination. To the extent that the amount of any Tax Attribute is later reduced or increased as a result of a Final Determination, such reduction or increase shall be allocated to the Party to which such Tax Attribute was allocated pursuant to this Section 3.07. Section 4.