Bitslicing and Efficient Sample Clauses

Bitslicing and Efficient. Sbox Representation‌ CPU architectures tend to operate best on their native word size or half-words and they encounter performance issues with bit-level manipulation. To deal with this issue, the Cortex-M4 features bit-banding support4, as well as a wide selection of bit-field instructions. However, applying them in the context of PRESENT requires extensive use of load and store instructions or numerous bit extractions/insertions, often resulting in poor performance. Bitslicing is a technique introduced by Xxxxx to tackle this inefficiency for DES [6]. Instead of using registers to store consecutive bits of a state, one uses them to hold one specific bit from several different states, effectively transforming bit-level operations into SIMD equivalents. In our implementation, we employ a bitsliced representation of factor 32, i.e. we process in parallel 32 cipher blocks, 64 bits each, resulting in 256 bytes per bitsliced encryption. Doing so, allows us to efficiently compute both the substi- tution and the permutation layer of PRESENT. Analytically, the Sbox can be decomposed into GF (2) operations which can be accelerated by via the SIMD- like instructions and it no longer requires the application of memory lookup tables.5 Similarly, the bit permutations can be accelerated by directly exchang- ing the memory contents of the corresponding bitsliced bits according to the permutation pattern, instead of relying on bit extraction, insertion and shifting. The GF (2) decomposition of the Sbox has sparked interest in the optimiza- tion of boolean circuits w.r.t. computational efficiency. In our implementation, we use the optimized boolean circuit suggested for PRESENT by Xxxxxxxx et al. [21]. The optimized representation was generated by applying the Xxxxx-Xxxxxxx heuristic [12], which reduces the circuit’s gate complexity, i.e. the number of AND, OR, XOR, NOT operations. The representation is shown below. T1 = X2^X1; T2 = X1&T1; T3 = X0^T2; Y4 = X3^T3; T2 = T1&T3; T1 ^= Y4; T2 ^= X1; T4 = X3|T2; Y3 = T1^T4; X3 =~ X3; T2^ = X3; Y1 = Y3^T2; T2 |= T1; Y2 = T3^T2; Values X1–X4 represent an Sbox input, T1–T4 hold temporary values and Y1-Y4 are output values. The total cost is 14 operations, 4 non-linear (AND, OR) and 10 linear (XOR,NOT).
Sample 1
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs

Related to Bitslicing and Efficient

  • Monitoring and Evaluation a. The AGENCY shall expeditiously provide to the COUNTY upon request, all data needed for the purpose of monitoring, evaluating and/or auditing the program(s). This data shall include, but not be limited to, clients served, services provided, outcomes achieved, information on materials and services delivered, and any other data required, in the sole discretion of the COUNTY, that may be required to adequately monitor and evaluate the services provided under this Contract. Monitoring shall be performed in accordance with COUNTY’S established Noncompliance Standards, a copy of which is attached hereto and incorporated by reference as Attachment “C”. b. The AGENCY agrees to permit persons duly authorized by the COUNTY to interview any clients and all current and/or former employees of the AGENCY to be assured of the AGENCY’S satisfactory performance of the terms of this Contract. c. Following such evaluation, monitoring, and/or audit, the COUNTY will deliver a report of its findings and recommendations with regard to the AGENCY’S conformance with this Contract’s terms and conditions to the AGENCY and/or Board of Directors’ President, and members, whenever applicable. If deficiencies are noted, a written notice of corrective action will be issued to the AGENCY which will specify deficiencies and provide a timeline for correction of those deficiencies. Within the designated timeframe in the written notice of corrective action, the AGENCY shall submit to the COUNTY’S CCC manager (“Manager”), or their designee, a corrective action plan to rectify all deficiencies identified by the COUNTY. d. Failure by the AGENCY to correct noted deficiencies, as outlined in the written notice of corrective action, may result in the AGENCY being deemed in breach of the Contract terms. e. The AGENCY shall cooperate with the COUNTY on all reviews to ensure compliance with all applicable COUNTY guidelines and requirements for general fund recipients.

  • Program Monitoring and Evaluation The Recipient shall prepare, or cause to be prepared, and furnish to the Association not later than six months after the Closing Date, a report of such scope and in such detail as the Association shall reasonably request, on the execution of the Program, the performance by the Recipient and the Association of their respective obligations under the Legal Agreements and the accomplishment of the purposes of the Financing.”

  • Training and Education SECTION 1 – Law Enforcement Supervisors’ Training

  • Reporting and Monitoring Please provide a brief description of the mechanisms proposed for this project for reporting to the UNDP and partners, including a reporting schedule.

  • Evaluation, Testing, and Monitoring 1. The System Agency may review, test, evaluate and monitor Grantee’s Products and services, as well as associated documentation and technical support for compliance with the Accessibility Standards. Review, testing, evaluation and monitoring may be conducted before and after the award of a contract. Testing and monitoring may include user acceptance testing. Neither the review, testing (including acceptance testing), evaluation or monitoring of any Product or service, nor the absence of review, testing, evaluation or monitoring, will result in a waiver of the State’s right to contest the Grantee’s assertion of compliance with the Accessibility Standards. 2. Grantee agrees to cooperate fully and provide the System Agency and its representatives timely access to Products, records, and other items and information needed to conduct such review, evaluation, testing, and monitoring.

  • Monitoring and Review The Provider agrees to allow access to the Department for purposes of monitoring and review. This access includes but is not limited to client records, fiscal records, staffing records, policy and procedural manuals, facilities, staff, and children in care of the Department. The Department will conduct quality reviews, which may include site-based quality review visits.

  • Skidding and Yarding Methods of skid- ding or yarding specified for particular areas, if any, are indicated on Sale Area Map. Outside Clearcutting Units and construction clearings, insofar as ground conditions permit, products shall not be skidded against reserve trees or groups of reproduction and tractors shall be equipped with a winch to facilitate skidding. B6.421 Rigging. Insofar as practicable, needed rigging shall be slung on stumps or trees desig- nated for cutting.

  • Monitoring and Reporting The Programme Operator shall monitor, record and report on progress towards the programme’s outcomes in accordance with the provisions contained in the legal framework. The Programme Operator shall ensure that suitable and sufficient monitoring and reporting arrangements are made with the project promoters in order to enable the Programme Operator and the National Focal Point to meet its obligations to the Donors. When reporting on progress achieved in Annual and Final Programme Reports, the Programme Operator shall disaggregate results achieved as appropriate and in accordance with instructions received from the FMO.

  • Safeguards Monitoring and Reporting The Borrower shall do the following or cause the Project Executing Agency to do the following:

  • Project Monitoring Reporting and Evaluation The Recipient shall furnish to the Association each Project Report not later than forty-five (45) days after the end of each calendar semester, covering the calendar semester.

Draft better contracts in just 5 minutes Get the weekly Law Insider newsletter packed with expert videos, webinars, ebooks, and more!