Common use of Certain Published Documents Clause in Contracts

Certain Published Documents. In cases where any application or any patent which would constitute prior art for the purposes of Article 33(2) and (3) had it been published prior to the rele- vant date referred to in Rule 64.1 was published on a date which is the same as, or later than, the relevant date but was filed earlier than the relevant date or claimed the priority of an earlier application which had been filed prior to the relevant date, such pub- lished application or patent shall not be considered part of the prior art for the purposes of Article 33(2) and (3). Nevertheless, the international preliminary examination report shall call attention to such applica- tion or patent in the manner provided for in Rule 70.10. Rule 65 Inventive Step or Non-Obviousness

Appears in 6 contracts

Samples: cdn.cocodoc.com, www.uspto.gov, www.uspto.gov

AutoNDA by SimpleDocs

Certain Published Documents. In cases where any application or any patent which would constitute prior art for the purposes of Article 33(2) and (3) had it been published prior to the rele- rele vant date referred to in Rule 64.1 was published on a date which is the same as, or later than, the relevant date but was filed earlier than the relevant date or claimed the priority of an earlier application which had been filed prior to the relevant date, such pub- pub lished application or patent shall not be considered part of the prior art for the purposes of Article 33(2) and (3). Nevertheless, the international preliminary examination report shall call attention to such applica- applica tion or patent in the manner provided for in Rule 70.10. Rule 65 Inventive Step or Non-Obviousness

Appears in 1 contract

Samples: www.uspto.gov

AutoNDA by SimpleDocs

Certain Published Documents. In cases where any application or any patent which would constitute prior art for the purposes of Article 33(2) and (3) had it been published prior to the rele- rele• vant date referred to in Rule 64.1 was published on a date which is the same as, or later than, the relevant date but was filed earlier than the relevant date or claimed the priority of an earlier application which had been filed prior to the relevant date, such pub- pub• lished application or patent shall not be considered part of the prior art for the purposes of Article 33(2) and (3). Nevertheless, the international preliminary examination report shall call attention to such applica- applica• tion or patent in the manner provided for in Rule 70.10. Rule 65 Inventive Step or Non-Obviousness

Appears in 1 contract

Samples: www.uspto.gov

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.