Commission Decision Sample Clauses

Commission Decision. The Commission will determine the amount, if any, of Issue Fund Grants that will be made available for each Eligible Proceeding. The Commission may make this determination based upon the following factors: (a) the breadth and complexity of the issues; (b) the significance of any policy issues; (c) the procedural schedule; (d) the dollar magnitude of the issues at stake; (e) the participation of other parties that adequately represent the interests of customers; (f) the amount of funds being provided by CUB; (g) CUB’s qualifications and experience before the Commission; (h) the level of available funds in the Fund account or accounts involved; and (i) other Eligible Proceedings in which CUB may seek additional Issue Fund Grants from the same Fund account. The Commission shall condition Issue Fund Grants on CUB’s providing evidence that CUB has used in-house resources or outside funding to account for or pay at least 20% of the Eligible Expenses for the work to be performed in the proceeding for which CUB is seeking an Issue Fund Grant. The Commission may deny, in whole or in part, a request for an Issue Fund Grant based on the above criteria and requirements. The Commission may place reasonable conditions on Issue Fund Grants, including but not limited to requiring that CUB use in-house resources or outside funding to account for or pay more than 20% of the Eligible Expenses for the work to be performed in the proceeding for which CUB is seeking an Issue Fund Grant. Except as provided in this Section, an Issue Fund Grant shall constitute a binding obligation on the Commission to order reimbursement of Eligible Expenses subject to satisfaction of any conditions imposed on the Issue Fund Grant and the requirements set forth in Article 7 and Article 8 below. The Commission may amend an Issue Fund Grant if it finds that there has been a material change in the breadth and complexity of the issues, the significance of the policy issues, or the dollar magnitude at stake, such that the initial Issue Fund Grant is no longer warranted. If the Commission amends an Issue Fund Grant, it will provide notice to CUB and afford an opportunity to comment and provide a revised budget. A Commission amendment of an Issue Fund Grant shall take effect on a prospective basis only. Eligible Expenses incurred or accrued before the Commission amendment will be reimbursed according to the terms set forth in Article 7 below notwithstanding the Commission amendment of the Issue Fund Gra...
Sample 1Sample 2See All (5)
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Commission Decision. This Agreement shall at all times be subject to such review by the Commission or FCC as permitted by the Act. If any such review renders the Agreement inoperable or creates any ambiguity or requirement for further amendment to the Agreement, the Parties will negotiate in good faith to agree upon any necessary amendments to the Agreement.
Sample 1Sample 2
Commission Decision. On August 20, 2018, the Division issued two Notices of Probable Violation to Fountaintown alleging violations of minimum safety standards for transportation and related pipeline facilities under Ind. Code ch. 8-1-22.5. The first Notice alleged 14 violations, including three violations relating to Fountaintown’s failure to properly odorize its gas and failing to appropriately monitor and document its odorization levels. The second Notice alleged six violations concerning Fountaintown’s failure to manage corrosion and document compliance. The Consent Agreement resolves the alleged violations for which Fountaintown has taken remedial action and agreed to pay a monetary civil penalty of $106,000. Upon review of the information provided by the Commission’s General Counsel, the Commission finds the Consent Agreement reasonably resolves the alleged violations. Accordingly, the Commission approves the December 4, 2020 Consent Agreement entered into between Fountaintown and the Division. 1. The December 4, 2020 Consent Agreement entered into between Fountaintown and the Division, a copy of which is attached to this Order, is approved. 2. Within 30 days from the date of this Order, Fountaintown shall pay a civil penalty of $106,000 to the Treasury of the State of Indiana through the Secretary of the Commission.
Sample 1
Commission Decision. The Commission has approved the attached revised version of the Operating Agreement4 published on 23rd May 2008 pursuant to Regulation 8 of S.I. No. 760 of 2005 (as amended). The Commission believes that the revised Operating Agreement meets both the letter and the spirit of the Regulations and also that it provides the basis for an efficient and sustainable relationship between the two companies for discharging their obligations and meeting the needs of the Irish gas industry in the coming years. While the arrangements described in the Agreement, and indeed in the Regulations themselves, may appear to have adopted what might be termed a relatively “light” ISO model, it is important to bear in mind that many of the “owner” functions charged to BGE will be in fact discharged by BG Networks which will continue to act as a separate division within BGE whose staff will be bound by strict ring fencing licence rules regarding non-disclosure of information etc. Examples of such functions include carrying out Gaslink’s Development Programme, managing all contracts with subcontractors etc. Even allowing for this, the Agreement also makes it clear that legal responsibility for the key statutory function of planning, developing and operating the gas network systems will rest exclusively with Gaslink. This Operating Agreement has been amended from that proposed operating agreement published in CER 08/073, this is to reflect changes agreed between the parties and the Commission since the consultation paper was issued and takes into account the comments received during the consultation. In a separate but related development, the Commission is also publishing transmission and distribution operator and owner xxxxxxxx0 for Gaslink and BGE respectively following a separate public consultation exercise. This was as required by the Regulations. These licences confine themselves to providing that, with regard to the Operating Agreement, the parties shall comply with its terms.
Sample 1
Commission Decision of 5 February 2010 on standard contractual clauses for the transfer of personal data to processors established in third countries under Directive 95/46/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council
Sample 1
Commission Decision. Commission Staff and Idaho Power recommend that the Application in Case No. IPC-E-10-17 (Xxxxxx Farms) be processed pursuant to Modified Procedure, i.e., by written submission rather than by hearing. Reference IDAPA 31.01.01.201-204. Does the Commission agree with the recommended procedure?
Sample 1
Commission Decision. The Company recommends that its Application be processed under Modified Procedure. Staff contends that a hearing is necessary. Staff recommends that the Commission establish an intervention deadline and schedule a prehearing conference. How does the Commission wish to process the Company’s Application?
Sample 1
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs

Related to Commission Decision

  • Arbitration Decision The arbitrator’s decision will be final and binding. The arbitrator shall issue a written arbitration decision revealing the essential findings and conclusions upon which the decision and/or award is based. A party’s right to appeal the decision is limited to grounds provided under applicable federal or state law.

  • Arbitration Decisions Unless otherwise agreed by the Parties, the arbitrator(s) shall render a decision within ninety (90) Calendar Days of appointment and shall notify the Parties in writing of such decision and the reasons therefor. The arbitrator(s) shall be authorized only to interpret and apply the provisions of this LGIA and shall have no power to modify or change any provision of this Agreement in any manner. The decision of the arbitrator(s) shall be final and binding upon the Parties, and judgment on the award may be entered in any court having jurisdiction. The decision of the arbitrator(s) may be appealed solely on the grounds that the conduct of the arbitrator(s), or the decision itself, violated the standards set forth in the Federal Arbitration Act or the Administrative Dispute Resolution Act. The final decision of the arbitrator(s) must also be filed with FERC if it affects jurisdictional rates, terms and conditions of service, Interconnection Facilities, or Network Upgrades.

  • Investment Decision The Purchaser understands that nothing in the Agreement or any other materials presented to the Purchaser in connection with the purchase and sale of the Shares constitutes legal, tax or investment advice. The Purchaser has consulted such legal, tax and investment advisors as it, in its sole discretion, has deemed necessary or appropriate in connection with its purchase of the Shares.

  • Independent Decision The Investor is not relying on the Issuer or on any legal or other opinion in the materials reviewed by the Investor with respect to the financial or tax considerations of the Investor relating to its investment in the Shares. The Investor has relied solely on the representations and warranties, covenants and agreements of the Issuer in this Agreement (including the exhibits and schedules hereto) and on its examination and independent investigation in making its decision to acquire the Shares.

  • Claim Decision Upon receipt of such claim, the Plan Administrator shall respond to such claimant within ninety (90) days after receiving the claim. If the Plan Administrator determines that special circumstances require additional time for processing the claim, the Plan Administrator can extend the response period by an additional ninety (90) days for reasonable cause by notifying the claimant in writing, prior to the end of the initial ninety (90) day period, that an additional period is required. The notice of extension must set forth the special circumstances and the date by which the Plan Administrator expects to render its decision. If the claim is denied in whole or in part, the Plan Administrator shall notify the claimant in writing of such denial. The Plan Administrator shall write the notification in a manner calculated to be understood by the claimant. The notification shall set forth: (i) The specific reasons for the denial; (ii) The specific reference to pertinent provisions of the Agreement on which the denial is based; (iii) A description of any additional information or material necessary for the claimant to perfect the claim and an explanation of why such material or information is necessary; (iv) Appropriate information as to the steps to be taken if the claimant wishes to submit the claim for review and the time limits applicable to such procedures; and (v) A statement of the claimant’s right to bring a civil action under ERISA Section 502(a) following an adverse benefit determination on review.

  • Final Decision Concessionaire covenants that the decision of the Commissioner of Department, relative to the performance of the terms and conditions of this Agreement, shall be final and conclusive.

  • Investment Decisions The Subadviser shall determine from time to time what investments and securities will be purchased, retained, sold or loaned by the Series, and what portion of such assets will be invested or held uninvested as cash.

  • Disagreement on Decision Should the parties disagree as to the meaning of the Board's decision, either party may apply to the Chairperson of the Arbitration Board to reconvene the Board to clarify the decision, which it shall make every effort to do within seven days.

  • Independent Investment Decision Such Purchaser has independently evaluated the merits of its decision to purchase the Shares pursuant to the Agreement, and such Purchaser confirms that it has not relied on the advice of any other Purchaser’s business and/or legal counsel in making such decision. Such Purchaser has not relied on the business or legal advice of the Company or any of its agents, counsel or Affiliates in making its investment decision hereunder, and confirms that none of such Persons has made any representations or warranties to such Purchaser in connection with the transactions contemplated by the Transaction Documents.

  • Review of Decision Within sixty (60) days after the Secretary’s receipt of a request for review, he or she will review the Company’s determination. After considering all materials presented by the Claimant, the Secretary will render a written opinion, written in a manner calculated to be understood by the Claimant, setting forth the specific reasons for the decision and containing specific references to the pertinent provisions of this Agreement on which the decision is based. If special circumstances require that the sixty (60) day time period be extended, the Secretary will so notify the Claimant and will render the decision as soon as possible, but no later than one hundred twenty (120) days after receipt of the request for review.

Draft better contracts in just 5 minutes Get the weekly Law Insider newsletter packed with expert videos, webinars, ebooks, and more!