Common use of Comprehensive Submission Clause in Contracts

Comprehensive Submission. A comprehensive submission is required to be submitted where: in relation to a Renewable ARIn, three years have elapsed since the last comprehensive submission; or a position is to be advertised with a rate of pay which includes the proposed ARIn amount; or a new ARIn for an individual position is being proposed for an existing employee; or a new Group Block Approval is being proposed or sought for an identified group of positions performing an identical function at the same classification level within a Directorate; or a variation is being proposed to an existing renewable ARIn, whether it applies to an individual position or group of positions under a Group Block Approval. A comprehensive submission provided in accordance with paragraph 8.5 must: address the matters to be considered at paragraph 5.1; and address any factors which the Director-General has considered relevant to whether an ARIn apply, and has had regard to in accordance with paragraph 5.1.6; and address whether the substantive position is correctly classified; and address whether the position’s job description and/or organisation structure of the business unit can be adjusted to mitigate the need for an ARIn; and contain a declaration by the Director-General that he or she considers it appropriate to provide the employee who occupies the position to which the ARIn is to apply with terms and conditions of employment that are in excess of those which are ordinarily provided for under this Agreement as set out in the ARIn. Where the Director-General considers that there is a compelling reason for the Directorate to pay enhanced rates of pay in excess of 50% of the base rate of pay for the position’s classification, the Director-General will address the compelling reason for such 50% plus enhanced pay in the submission under paragraph 8.6 to the Head of Service.

Comprehensive Submission. A comprehensive submission In reviewing an ARIn, the director-general must have regard to the matters to be considered at paragraph 2.3. The director-general must also take into consideration relevant market data. To commence, cease or change any ARIn, a Comprehensive Submission to the head of service is required. Specifically, a Comprehensive Submission is required to be submitted where: a preliminary view is formed by the director-general that the position ceases to be critical to the operation of the Directorate or business unit in the Directorate; a preliminary view is formed by the director-general that the employee ceases to hold the required specialist qualifications or specialist attributes; a new ARIn (Project ARIn, Fixed Term ARIn, Renewable ARIn or Group ARIn) is being proposed for an existing employee or group of employees; in relation to a Renewable ARIn, three years have elapsed since the last comprehensive submissionComprehensive Submission; in relation to a Group ARIn, to establish a Group ARIn and no more than three years from either commencement or from the last Comprehensive Submission and prior to the date of expiry of this Agreement; a position is to be advertised with a rate of pay which includes the proposed ARIn amount; or a new ARIn for an individual position is being proposed for an existing employee; or a new Group Block Approval is being proposed or sought for an identified group of positions performing an identical function at the same classification level within a Directorate; or a variation is being proposed to an existing renewable Renewable ARIn or Group ARIn, whether it applies to an individual position or group of positions under a Group Block Approval. A comprehensive submission provided in accordance with paragraph 8.5 Comprehensive Submission must: address the matters to be considered at paragraph 5.1; and address any factors which the Director-General has considered relevant to whether an ARIn apply, and has had regard to in accordance with paragraph 5.1.62.3 of this Framework; and address whether the substantive position is correctly classified; and address whether the position’s job description and/or organisation structure of the business unit can be adjusted to mitigate the need for an ARIn; and contain a declaration by where the Directordirector-General that he or she considers it appropriate to provide the employee who occupies the position to which the ARIn is to apply with terms and conditions of employment that are in excess of those which are ordinarily provided for under this Agreement as set out in the ARIn. Where the Director-General general considers that there is a compelling reason for the Directorate to pay enhanced rates of pay in excess of 50% of the base rate of pay for the position’s classification, the Directordirector-General general will provide the OIRWS details of that compelling reason, including appropriate evidence and supporting remuneration data. When a recruitment selection process is proposed to include a pre-approved ARIn, the Comprehensive Submission must: address the compelling reason for such 50% plus enhanced pay circumstances of the recruitment selection process (i.e., why an ARIn is necessary to be included in the submission under paragraph 8.6 advertised rate); demonstrate the position (or a similar position) has recently been advertised without an ARIn and did not attract a suitable field or provide evidence that advertising at the Agreement rate will not attract a suitable field; and set out the reasons in support of the ARIn itself (i.e., why the position meets the ARIn eligibility criteria). Where, following head of service consideration of a Comprehensive Submission and a Renewable ARIn is approved by the director-general, it must be reassessed no more than 18 months later through a Renewal Submission. A Renewal Submission is required to be completed where: it is proposed that a Renewable ARIn should be renewed on the same terms; an employee who is party to a Fixed Term, Renewable or Project ARIn temporarily vacates the position to which the ARIn relates, and it is being proposed that the ARIn be provided to the Head employee who is acting in the vacated position; or an employee who is party to a Fixed Term, Renewable or Project ARIn temporarily vacates the position to which the ARIn relates for a period of Serviceninety days or more, and it is being proposed that the ARIn apply to the employee upon the employee’s return to the position. A Comprehensive or Renewal Submission due under this Agreement must be completed before the due date. Where a Comprehensive or Renewal Submission is not completed before the due date, the responsible Directorate will within one week of the due date passing: notify the employee(s) covered by the ARIn of the delay; provide reasons for the delay to the head of service; and develop and implement a plan to ensure the review is completed within three months. If the review is not completed within the three-month period, the head of service will arrange for the review to be completed expeditiously. The ARIn will continue until the review is completed in accordance with either subparagraph 7.8.3 or paragraph 7.9.

Comprehensive Submission. A comprehensive submission is required to be submitted whereif any of the following apply: in In relation to a Renewable ARIn, three 3 years have elapsed since the last comprehensive submission; or a . A position is to be advertised with a rate of pay which includes the proposed ARIn amount; or a . A new ARIn for an individual position is being proposed for an existing employee; or a . A new Group Block Approval is being proposed or sought for an identified group of positions performing an identical function at the same classification level within a Directorate; or a directorate. A variation is being proposed to an existing renewable ARIn, whether it applies to an individual position or group of positions under a Group Block Approval. A comprehensive submission provided in accordance with paragraph subclause 8.5 mustmust include all of the following: address Address the matters to be considered at paragraph subclause 5.1; and address . Address any factors which the Directordirector-General general has considered relevant to whether an ARIn apply, and has had regard to in accordance with paragraph 5.1.6; and address . Address whether the substantive position is correctly classified; and address . Address whether the position’s job description and/or or organisation structure of the business unit can be adjusted to mitigate the need for an ARIn; and contain a . A declaration by the Directordirector-General general that he or she considers they consider it appropriate to provide the employee who occupies the position to which the ARIn is to apply with terms and conditions of employment that are in excess of those which are ordinarily provided for under this Agreement as set out in the ARIn. Where the Directordirector-General general considers that there is a compelling reason for the Directorate directorate to pay enhanced rates of pay in excess of 50% of the base rate of pay for the position’s classification, the Directordirector-General will general must address the compelling reason for such 50% plus enhanced pay in the submission under paragraph subclause 8.6 to the Head of Service.