Common use of CONCLUSIVE PRESUMPTION REGARDING STANDARD OF CONDUCT Clause in Contracts

CONCLUSIVE PRESUMPTION REGARDING STANDARD OF CONDUCT. The Indemnitee shall be conclusively presumed to have met the relevant standards of conduct required by the DGCL for indemnification pursuant to this Agreement, unless a determination is made that the Indemnitee has not met such standards (i) by the Board of Directors of the Company by a majority vote of a quorum thereof consisting of directors who were not parties to such Proceeding, (ii) by the stockholders of the Company by majority vote, or (iii) in a written opinion of the Company's independent legal counsel. Further, the termination of any Proceeding by judgment, order, settlement, conviction or upon a plea of nolo contendere or its equivalent, shall not, of itself, rebut such presumption that the Indemnitee met the relevant standards of conduct required for indemnification pursuant to this Agreement.

CONCLUSIVE PRESUMPTION REGARDING STANDARD OF CONDUCT. The Indemnitee shall be conclusively presumed to have met the relevant standards of conduct required by the DGCL California law for indemnification pursuant to this Agreement, unless a determination is made that the Indemnitee has not met such standards (i) by the Board of Directors of the Company by a majority vote of a quorum thereof consisting of directors who were not parties to such Proceeding, (ii) by the stockholders shareholders of the Company by majority vote, or (iii) in a written opinion of the Company's ’s independent legal counsel. Further, the termination of any Proceeding by judgment, order, settlement, conviction or upon a plea of nolo contendere or its equivalent, shall not, of itself, rebut such presumption that the Indemnitee met the relevant standards of conduct required for indemnification pursuant to this Agreement.

CONCLUSIVE PRESUMPTION REGARDING STANDARD OF CONDUCT. The Indemnitee shall be conclusively presumed to have met the relevant standards of conduct required by the DGCL Law for indemnification pursuant to this Agreement, unless a determination is made that the Indemnitee has not met such standards (i) by the Board of Directors of the Company by a majority vote of a quorum thereof consisting of directors who were not parties to such Proceeding, (ii) by the stockholders of the Company by a majority vote, or (iii) in a written opinion of the Company's ’s independent legal counsel. Further, the termination of any Proceeding by judgment, order, settlement, conviction or upon a plea of nolo contendere or its equivalent, shall not, of itself, rebut such presumption that the Indemnitee met the relevant standards of conduct required for indemnification pursuant to this Agreement.

CONCLUSIVE PRESUMPTION REGARDING STANDARD OF CONDUCT. The Indemnitee shall be conclusively presumed to have met the relevant standards of conduct required by the DGCL Law for indemnification pursuant to this Agreement, unless a determination is made that the Indemnitee has not met such standards (i) by the Board of Directors of the Company by a majority vote of a quorum thereof consisting of directors who were not parties to such Proceeding, (ii) by the stockholders of the Company by a majority vote, or (iii) in a written opinion of the Company's independent legal counsel. Further, the termination of any Proceeding by judgment, order, settlement, conviction or upon a plea of nolo contendere or its equivalent, shall not, of itself, rebut such presumption that the Indemnitee met the relevant standards of conduct required for indemnification pursuant to this Agreement.

CONCLUSIVE PRESUMPTION REGARDING STANDARD OF CONDUCT. The Indemnitee shall be conclusively presumed to have met the relevant standards of conduct required by the DGCL California for indemnification pursuant to this Agreement, unless a determination is made that the Indemnitee has not met such standards (i) by the Board of Directors of the Company by a majority vote of a quorum thereof consisting of directors who were not parties to such Proceeding, (ii) by the stockholders shareholders of the Company by a majority vote, or (iii) in a written opinion of the Company's ’s independent legal counsel. Further, the termination of any Proceeding by judgment, order, settlement, conviction or upon a plea of nolo contendere or its equivalent, shall not, of itself, rebut such presumption that the Indemnitee met the relevant standards of conduct required for indemnification pursuant to this Agreement.